On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
# Form controls by default associate with their nearest form
# ancestor.
Could this sentence be made more normative? That it actually is a
requirement unless the control has a 'form' attribute specified. That in
that case the rules for that
Ian Hickson wrote:
# The children of a form element must be block-level elements,
# unless one of the ancestors of the form element is a td, th, li,
# dd, dt, or block-level element other than div, in which case
# either block-level or inline-level content is allowed (but not
# both). input
Ian Hickson wrote:
The UA should not be required to provide such an ability. All radio
buttons being unchecked in a group is an error condition. However if
the UA wants to provide it, that's a UA thing.
It is in error? Let me quote something:
# Radio buttons in sets where none of the buttons are
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
The BODY element is a block-level element other than the DIV element.
No, it's not.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#h-7.5.3
Hmm, ok. And how about P, H1, etc? I agree with James Graham that the
wording isn't very
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
The UA should not be required to provide such an ability. All radio
buttons being unchecked in a group is an error condition. However if
the UA wants to provide it, that's a UA thing.
It is in error? Let me quote
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, James Graham wrote:
I think the need to point this out implies that the condition (and the
wording of the condition) is too complex for most authors to understand
(and it's clear that no UA will enforce such a condition). Therefore the
paragraph as it stands benefits
