Re: [whatwg] Constructors for HTML Elements

2012-01-28 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, James Graham wrote: There seems to be some interest in making all concrete interfaces in the DOM constructible [...]. I haven't done this for HTML element interfaces. I think Element.create(), as discussed in public-webapps, is a more scalable approach. -- Ian Hickson

[whatwg] Constructors for HTML Elements

2011-11-07 Thread James Graham
There seems to be some interest in making all concrete interfaces in the DOM constructible (there also seems to be some interest in making abstract interfaces constructible, but that seems insane to me and I will speak no further of it). This presents some special difficulties for HTML

Re: [whatwg] Constructors for HTML Elements

2011-11-07 Thread Michael A. Puls II
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:00:14 -0500, James Graham jgra...@opera.com wrote: There seems to be some interest in making all concrete interfaces in the DOM constructible (there also seems to be some interest in making abstract interfaces constructible, but that seems insane to me and I will

Re: [whatwg] Constructors for HTML Elements

2011-11-07 Thread James Graham
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Michael A. Puls II wrote: On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:00:14 -0500, James Graham jgra...@opera.com wrote: There seems to be some interest in making all concrete interfaces in the DOM constructible (there also seems to be some interest in making abstract interfaces

Re: [whatwg] Constructors for HTML Elements

2011-11-07 Thread Michael A. Puls II
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:15:17 -0500, James Graham jgra...@opera.com wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Michael A. Puls II wrote: On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:00:14 -0500, James Graham jgra...@opera.com wrote: There seems to be some interest in making all concrete interfaces in the DOM constructible