timeless ha scritto:
i don't really want to spend a lot of time with this, but any feature
authors are provided will be abused.
among my list of things which i wish were never let out of pandora's
box are defining accesskeys (instead of commands) in html, and another
which i'd hope dies on the
timeless wrote:
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ultimately, a user agent or user can always reject
presentational fluff.
designing a user interface to enable users to tell their user agent to
ignore such content ends up being more complicated and problematic
than supporting the
i don't really want to spend a lot of time with this, but any feature
authors are provided will be abused.
among my list of things which i wish were never let out of pandora's
box are defining accesskeys (instead of commands) in html, and another
which i'd hope dies on the vine is aural css.
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis ha scritto:
Calogero Alex Baldacchino wrote:
That worked fine on Opera 9 and FF2, but, when tried on IE7, the show
became a little weird... the element was there, the style attribute
was regarded as for any other element (display:block worked), but
didn't applied to any
Calogero Alex Baldacchino wrote:
That worked fine on Opera 9 and FF2, but, when tried on IE7, the show
became a little weird... the element was there, the style attribute was
regarded as for any other element (display:block worked), but didn't
applied to any of its descendents, as if they
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis ha scritto:
Calogero Alex Baldacchino wrote:
I know, and agree with the basic reasons; however I think that
deriving an SGML version (i.e. by adding new entities and elements, as
needed, to an html 4 dtd) should not be very difficoult, and could be
worth the effort
Calogero Alex Baldacchino wrote:
I know, and agree with the basic reasons; however I think that deriving
an SGML version (i.e. by adding new entities and elements, as needed, to
an html 4 dtd) should not be very difficoult, and could be worth the
effort (i.e. to graceful degrade the
