Dated June 2010... It appears someone raced me!
I look forward to seeing this implemented.
Only... One weakness in the existing document that might be addressed
as an upgrade to this specification at a later date: there appears
to be scant reference to methods of specifying date and time as
http://forums.whatwg.org/bb3/viewtopic.php?f=3t=4725
[Topic has been on forum for 2 weeks without reply. Now posting to
mailing list.]
--
Hyperlinks for geographic coordinates are a mess. Designers of web
applications are being forced to design their own solutions to make
geographic links
See RFC 5870[1] for a proposed standard geo URI scheme for geo:
hyperlinks. - Tantek
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5870
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:27, Matthew Slyman wha...@aaabit.com wrote:
http://forums.whatwg.org/bb3/viewtopic.php?f=3t=4725
[Topic has been on forum for 2 weeks without
Bjoern Hoehrmann:
* Christoph Päper wrote:
geo:13.4125,103.8667@mars
You can specify the coordinate reference system with the crs paramameter
Yes, but I don’t think it’s a good design to select the astronomic body with
the same property that you use to switch between different CRSs for a
You can define the crs (srsName) for a geo: link which effectively
allows you to do that. See the registry in the spec.
roBman
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 21:26 +0200, Christoph Päper wrote:
Tantek Çelik:
See RFC 5870[1] for a proposed standard geo URI scheme for geo:
hyperlinks.
I
