On Jun 4, 2007, at 9:25 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
May I suggest reproposing [DOMContentLoaded] for DOM 3 Events, then,
since your former objection to it is withdrawn?
I can if you want, but I don't really see it as a feature that
would be
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I can if you want, but I don't really see it as a feature that would
be expected in DOM3 Events. DOM Events defines the event
infrastructure; it doesn't define when and how each event is actually
fired. The firing of the events in HTML is
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
May I suggest reproposing [DOMContentLoaded] for DOM 3 Events, then,
since your former objection to it is withdrawn?
I can if you want, but I don't really see it as a feature that would be
expected in DOM3 Events. DOM Events defines the event
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On May 19, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Dean Edwards wrote:
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On May 18, 2007, at 10:14 PM, liorean wrote:
On 19/05/07, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The uniqueID thing is really working around a deficiency in JS
(inability to use objects as keys).
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
To my knowledge, most non-JavaScript programming languages already have
facilities for hashing on object identity. This is true at least of C++,
Java, Objective-C and C; it also appears to be true of Python, Ruby,
Perl and C# as far as I can tell from the docs. What
On May 18, 2007, at 9:56 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
I did quite a lot of research before defining it. There's content
depending on it. Two browsers support it, and workarounds are hacked
into
libraries to fake it for the two other browsers, including one that
supports script defer. (The
On Saturday, May 19, 2007 1:37 AM liorean wrote:
True, but what is wanted by scripters isn't that it triggers before
any rendering takes place at all, what is wanted by scripters is to
not have to wait for external content to load, in difference to the
load event. The important factors are that
On May 18, 2007, at 10:14 PM, liorean wrote:
On 19/05/07, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for (var i in elements) {
if (!elements[i].processed) {
process(elements[i]);
elements[i].processed = true;
}
}
for (var i in elements)
delete elements[i].processed;
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On May 18, 2007, at 10:14 PM, liorean wrote:
On 19/05/07, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The uniqueID thing is really working around a deficiency in JS
(inability to use objects as keys). I think that's where it should be
addressed. The uniqueID idea has a number
On May 19, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Dean Edwards wrote:
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On May 18, 2007, at 10:14 PM, liorean wrote:
On 19/05/07, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The uniqueID thing is really working around a deficiency in JS
(inability to use objects as keys). I think that's where it
Ian Hickson wrote:
Speaking of setTimeout, where is this defined?
http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#settimeout
On 4/21/05, Dean Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. That's twice in one day. I'm off to read the WA1 spec
On 21/04/05, Jim Ley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 18, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Dean Edwards wrote:
1) Mozilla's DOMContentLoaded event is very handy. It fires when a
node's content has been loaded and parsed (the DOM has been
constructed). This is much better than the standard onload event as
it
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
1) Mozilla's DOMContentLoaded event is very handy. It fires when a
node's content has been loaded and parsed (the DOM has been
constructed). This is much better than the standard onload event as
it doesn't wait for binary content to
On 19/05/07, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) I find myself using Microsoft's uniqueID property quite often. Although the
ID attribute is supposed to provide a unique identifier, it often doesn't. We
would probably need a complementary DOM method to retrieve an element by
uniqueID (IE
On 4/21/05, Dean Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
Speaking of setTimeout, where is this defined?
http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#settimeout
OK. That's twice in one day. I'm off to read the WA1 spec
It's rather odd though, as it's been defined
There are some scripting tweaks I'd like to see in WA1. Apologies if
these have been covered already:
1) Mozilla's DOMContentLoaded event is very handy. It fires when a
node's content has been loaded and parsed (the DOM has been
constructed). This is much better than the standard onload event
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Dean Edwards wrote:
So you'd submit to a hidden iframe and then disable the main page?
Yep. The iframe then unlocks the page when submission is complete.
Forgetting about iframes for a minute. This is analogous to disabling
the entire application (not the chrome).
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Dean Edwards wrote:
So you'd submit to a hidden iframe and then disable the main page?
Yep. The iframe then unlocks the page when submission is complete.
Forgetting about iframes for a minute. This is analogous to disabling
the entire application (not the
Brad Fults wrote:
On 4/20/05, Dean Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but as I said initially, that creates a closure. This is not always
the most efficient solution. Your code won't work anyway because i is
variable. The closure would need to be more complicated to work properly.
Talking about
On 4/20/05, Dean Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of setTimeout, where is this defined?
Nowhere, and in fact the string method is the commoner implementation,
there are a number of implementations which do not support a function
reference.
uniqueID is very useful, I to use it all the
[I'll get back to the rest of the thread when I actually work on the
relevant parts of the spec (I agree with the proposals in general, so
there isn't much for me to add), but just jumping in here:]
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Dean Edwards wrote:
Speaking of setTimeout, where is this defined?
At 01:11 PM 4/20/2005, you wrote:
On 4/20/05, Dean Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of setTimeout, where is this defined?
Nowhere, and in fact the string method is the commoner implementation,
there are a number of implementations which do not support a function
reference.
uniqueID is
22 matches
Mail list logo
