On 8 Feb 2007, at 9:42AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
importance is differen[t] from emphasis.
This is indeed what the current version of the specification says, but I
honestly
think this distinction is too artificial to work in practice.
HTML4 clearly defines em and strong as more or less (of)
David Latapie écrivit:
Do you mean than focus is another subset of emphasis?
If you mean whether I think m conveys some sort of emphasis, then the answer
is yes.
I do not argue that a distinction between emphasis indicated by the
author and emphasis added afterwards is necessarily a bad idea,
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:53:15 +0100, Øistein E. Andersen wrote:
David Latapie écrivit:
Do you mean than focus is another subset of emphasis?
If you mean whether I think m conveys some sort of emphasis, then
the answer
is yes.
You answered my question
I do not argue that a distinction
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:05:12 +0530, Øistein E. Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 8 Feb 2007, at 9:42AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
importance is differen[t] from emphasis.
This is indeed what the current version of the specification says, but I
honestly
think this distinction is too
