Re: [whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-13 Thread philipj
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 04:39:43 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/10/2010, at 1:28 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:18:37 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Philip Jägenstedt

Re: [whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-13 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:00:25 -0700, Jeroen Wijering jer...@longtailvideo.com wrote: On Oct 8, 2010, at 2:24 PM, whatwg-requ...@lists.whatwg.org wrote: Even if very few subtitles use inline SVG, SVG in object, img, iframe, video, self-referencing track, etc in the cue text, all

Re: [whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-13 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 04:39:43 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/10/2010, at 1:28 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:18:37 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Philip Jägenstedt

Re: [whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-13 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 22:54:53 +0200, phil...@opera.com wrote: I'm making a few assumptions here: Sorry all, my mail client (Opera, hrm) seems to have taken offense to my authoring and discarding of several replies when offline and has punished me by showing them to the world. Please ignore

Re: [whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-08 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
On 08/10/2010, at 1:28 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:18:37 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:37:06 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer

Re: [whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-08 Thread Jeroen Wijering
On Oct 8, 2010, at 2:24 PM, whatwg-requ...@lists.whatwg.org wrote: Even if very few subtitles use inline SVG, SVG in object, img, iframe, video, self-referencing track, etc in the cue text, all implementations would have to support it in the same way for it to be interoperable. That's quite

Re: [whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-07 Thread James Graham
On 10/06/2010 04:04 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: As an aside, the idea of using an HTML parser for the cue text wasn't very popular. Why? Were any technical reasons given? Finally, some things I think are broken in the current WebSRT parser: One more from me: the spec is unusually hard

Re: [whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-07 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:37:06 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.comwrote: Styling hooks were requested.If we only have the predefined tags (i, b, ...) and voices, these will most certainly be abused,

Re: [whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-07 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:18:37 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:37:06 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Philip

Re: [whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-06 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.comwrote: Styling hooks were requested. If we only have the predefined tags (i, b, ...) and voices, these will most certainly be abused, e.g. resulting in i being used where italics isn't wanted or v Foo being used just for

[whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-05 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
Over the past week I've attended 3 video-related events in New York and have discussed track and WebSRT at all of them. Here's a lengthy report of feedback, mine and others. At the Open Subtitles Design Summit [1], there was some discussion about captioning for the HoH. I've already put