Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no way we can ever guarantee that there are no covering patents.
Whether a patent covers a technology or not really has more to do with
what the courts say than with what the patents say. If Apple say they
don't want to implement Ogg, then we
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Stewart Brodie wrote:
Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no way we can ever guarantee that there are no covering
patents. Whether a patent covers a technology or not really has more
to do with what the courts say than with what the patents say. If
On Dec 12, 2007 1:07 AM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what the courts say than with what the patents say. If Apple say they
don't want to implement Ogg, then we have to find another solution.
(Similarly -- Opera, Mozilla, et al, don't want to implement H.264. So we
have to find a
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, bofh wrote:
The whole point of the change was to make the point that we need
something that will not screw you. Ogg isn't a solution, as it won't
be implemented by Apple and Microsoft. If we require Ogg, then what
will happen is the big players will support
