Thanks to everyone contributing on this thread -- though it has not so far
resulted in a change to the spec, this was a model discussion.
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, usuario wrote:
>
> Tiis may seem somewhat silly, every front-end developer have ever used a
> a wrapper div, shouldn't it be more semant
Am 01.03.2011 23:50 schrieb Jordan Dobson:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Markus Ernst wrote:
Am 28.02.2011 19:56 schrieb Tab Atkins Jr.:
I believe you're arguing that the "wrapper" semantic, being similarly
ubiquitous, thus needs its own new element as well. What you're
missing is that t
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Markus Ernst wrote:
> Am 28.02.2011 19:56 schrieb Tab Atkins Jr.:
>
>
>> I believe you're arguing that the "wrapper" semantic, being similarly
>> ubiquitous, thus needs its own new element as well. What you're
>> missing is that the "wrapper" semantic is precisely
Am 28.02.2011 19:56 schrieb Tab Atkins Jr.:
I believe you're arguing that the "wrapper" semantic, being similarly
ubiquitous, thus needs its own new element as well. What you're
missing is that the "wrapper" semantic is precisely what already
expresses.
I do understand usuario's proposal sl
On 3/1/11, usuario wrote:
> [resending reply, sorry again with problems]
> My idea of wrapper or content was to identify actual content from the rest
> of the window space. Like actual content centered at
> 960px
>
That seems like a presentational problem, better solved by fixing the CSS
box model
[resending reply, sorry again with problems]
My idea of wrapper or content was to identify actual content from the rest
of the window space. Like actual content centered at
960px
Thanks, I hope i can still contribute to the list, even if my thoughts seem
odd.
2011/2/28 Ashley Sheridan
> On Mo
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:46 AM, usuario wrote:
>> carries no semantic meaning. If you are using it for such, the
>> semantic is purely internal to your application, and thus doesn't
>> carry the common meaning of "semantics" as used on the web.
>
> We have no problems with definition. But i
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 18:46 +, usuario wrote:
> [Had problems sending my mails to the list, resending message]
>
> Some of you may be questioning why a wrapper element if it has not
> semantics, the thing is, It DO have semantics.
>
> Wrapper:
> a container element whose solely purpose is to
[Had problems sending my mails to the list, resending message]
Some of you may be questioning why a wrapper element if it has not
semantics, the thing is, It DO have semantics.
Wrapper:
a container element whose solely purpose is to isolate flow content for
visually appealing purposes. It it usua
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> [quotation reorganized by me]
>> What semantics would such an wrapper element provide over ? I'd
>> rather discourage, and provide alternative features to wrapping.
>> Providing another element for that purpose
I agree with Bjartur, does the work fine.
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:40:15 -0500, ddailey wrote:
Given that SVG and HTML are now interminglable in the same document,
why not start intermingling their tag definitions?
Please don't start mixing SVG+HTML properties or one day it will be a
hell of
definitions?
cheers
David
- Original Message -
From: "usuario"
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 3:20 PM
Subject: [whatwg] wrapper element
Tiis may seem somewhat silly, every front-end developer have ever used a a
wrapper div, shouldn't it be more semantic to have a wrapper element?
Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
[quotation reorganized by me]
On 2/27/11, usuario wrote:
Tiis may seem somewhat silly, every front-end developer have ever
used a a wrapper div, shouldn't it be more semantic to have a
wrapper element?
If said wrappers don't have any semantics but grouping loosely
If said wrappers don't have any semantics but grouping loosely related
elements, for which no semantic container exists, div seems
appropriate.
What semantics would such an wrapper element provide over ? I'd
rather discourage, and provide alternative features to wrapping.
Providing another element
Tiis may seem somewhat silly, every front-end developer have ever used a a
wrapper div, shouldn't it be more semantic to have a wrapper element?
15 matches
Mail list logo
