Kornel Lesinski wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2005 16:56:44 +0100, James Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That seems to be based on the belief that all things which look like
links must correspond to idempotent actions.
Yes, that is exactly the idea behind it.
I don't think this is true and, in general
James Graham wrote:
That seems to be based on the belief that all things which look like
links must correspond to idempotent actions. I don't think this is true
and, in general, think that trying to couple the user interface to the
underlying protocol is a bad idea.
No, its a great idea! ;-)
Mos
On Fri, 13 May 2005 16:56:44 +0100, James Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That seems to be based on the belief that all things which look like
links must correspond to idempotent actions.
Yes, that is exactly the idea behind it.
I don't think this is true and, in general, think that trying to c
Henri Sivonen wrote:
On May 13, 2005, at 06:28, Michael Gratton wrote:
Most web applications I have seen (certainly nearly every one written
in Java) do not differentiate between parameters provided by a GET or
a POST; you can do either and the application will work in the same way.
Of the vario
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 16:47 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Of the various server-side frameworks available Java servlets are among
> the most cluefully designed when it comes to getting HTTP right. If a
> developer calls doPost from doGet, there is nothing the framework
> designer can do about it
On May 13, 2005, at 06:28, Michael Gratton wrote:
Most web applications I have seen (certainly nearly every one written
in Java) do not differentiate between parameters provided by a GET or
a POST; you can do either and the application will work in the same
way.
Of the various server-side framew
(In response to
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2005/04/20/deviant.html
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2005/04/27/deviant.html
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2005/05/04/deviant.html
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2005/05/11/deviant.html
...)
First of all, thanks for your comments!
I've skipped past the less
