On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Kornel Lesinski wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:07:45 +0100, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any concrete proposals? :-)
Persistent associative array that stores anything*, just like session
object in PHP and ASP.
This might be called:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Olav Junker Kjær wrote:
Anyone have any concrete proposals? :-)
How about a javascript structure which may be arbitrary deep, but only
may contain javascript built-in types (Object, Array, string, number,
bool, Date etc.)? This would be very easy to use, although
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Robert Sayre wrote:
Olav Junker Kjær wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
Anyone have any concrete proposals? :-)
http://www.crockford.com/JSON/index.html ?
It turns out that the way I ended up defining this, I didn't need to
describe the back-end serialisation format.
Thanks for your feedback!
Diffs from what you read to what the spec says now are available at:
http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/diff-2005-09-01#client-side
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
3.4.2 DOM Node objects browser DOM nodes often have state that isn't
On 08/09/05, Robert O'Callahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, but the problem then becomes what happens when one language sets a property and another language gets it: i.e. what you put in your note:
define how to take a JS Object and turn it into a Perl %hash, etc. --- without doing some N^2
