*Anne van Kesteren* [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The advantage of DI is that it allows grouping of definitions
ACK
and therefore takes away the importance of element order.
So you want to put 'dt' after 'dd'? Seems strange to me.
From a structural point of view it is very difficult for current DL
element
*Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]*:
abbrMsuplle/sup/abbr
varxsub2/sub/var
I'm not sure how to deal with the chemistry case. We don't really have an
element for anything like chemical formulas.
Stretching its semantics really far, one could use 'code' for formulas¹
and 'abbr' for isotopes etc.
¹
Ian Hickson schrieb:
I read a lot of fiction books and when I come across a * * * it reads to
me like a paragraph, saying Meanwhile, in a different part of the
universe:; it doesn't read as end section. new section:.
section
...
div class=pov Foo.../div
!-- 'plot', 'note',
Sorry for the late reply, I had to read the whole thread in www-html
first and was away for a few days.
Ian Hickson:
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Christoph Päper wrote:
Ian Hickson:
section
div class=pov Foo.../div
...
...has no semantics apart from delineating one section. Remember
Matthew Raymond:
Christoph Päper wrote:
The div (as well as span) does indeed have semantic meaning in
that it can group things. However, in the case of replacing hr, I
don't see how this semantic information can actually be used to benefit
the user. It's certainly useless on modern
Lachlan Hunt:
I just did a google search and found some references [1] stating that
ISO 8601:1988 and ISO 8601:2000 have been withdrawn and replaced with
ISO 8601:2004. I'm not sure what the differences are (I haven't read
through the whole article yet), though it looks like the basic date
column-progressive despite 'tr' meaning table row; it includes the
row-groups ('thead', 'tfoot' and 'tbody'). Actually I am not sure
whether it is not too presentational and thus would better be done in CSS.
Christoph Päper
Ian Hickson:
The difficulty is in walking the fine line between useful and
over-constrained. For example, the fact that ol/ol is invalid in HTML4
is a real problem.
Well,
olliThis list item will be replaced by a script./ol
is not invalid. An empty list doesn't make any sense otherwise,
Anne van Kesteren:
It should basically not happen at all. It appears that no browser has
implemented the 'may' from HTML4
That's the logic of tagsoup parsers, i.e. their inconsistency regarding
authoring sloppiness. If it had been should not, they would probably
do it. ;)
Did you also try
Lachlan Hunt:
!
As useless as the first one may be,
Well, it's shorter than !--sic!--, i.e. usable for source code emphasis.
10 matches
Mail list logo
