Web browsers are (hopefully) designed so that they run in every culture. If
you define a custom vocabulary without considering its ability to describe
phenomena of other cultures and try to impose it worldwide, you do more harm
than good to the representatives of those cultures. And considering i
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008, Julian Reschke wrote:
Again you're confusing HTTP URLs with URIs.
Using URIs as identifiers allows lots of identification schemes other
than HTTP, in particular ones that are not based on DNS, or that use
DNS, but include a timestamp to address the conc
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Dan Brickley wrote:
>
> You mentioned earlier that the RDFish practices around downloading and
> interpreting schemas from the Web is news to you. I'll take up an action
> to document some of the things we do in that area (eg. with SPARQL for
> data merging), probably as a
Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
Web browsers are (hopefully) designed so that they run in every culture. If
you define a custom vocabulary without considering its ability to describe
phenomena of other cultures and try to impose it worldwide, you do more harm
than good to the representatives of those
Le 26 août 2008 à 16:04, Kristof Zelechovski a écrit :
Web browsers are (hopefully) designed so that they run in every
culture. If
you define a custom vocabulary without considering its ability to
describe
phenomena of other cultures and try to impose it worldwide, you do
more harm
than g
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Manu Sporny wrote:
>
> Web browsers currently do not understand the meaning behind human
> statements or concepts on a web page. While this may seem academic, it
> has direct implications on website usability. If web browsers could
> understand that a particular page was de
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Dan Brickley wrote:
[...]
Sketch of a scenario:
1. Alice deploys 1979 to describe a
museum artifact. She calls it this because it marks up some information
about the creation date of some real world thing, and because
'creationDate' is already in use
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Dan Brickley wrote:
> >
> > If Charlie wants to work with Alice's site, he should agree with Alice
> > about what vocabularies they're going to use, and then only use that.
>
> Are you suggesting pairwise contracts between producers and consumers of
> HTML-embedded structur
Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
> Web browsers are (hopefully) designed so that they run in every culture. If
> you define a custom vocabulary without considering its ability to describe
> phenomena of other cultures and try to impose it worldwide, you do more harm
> than good to the representatives of
I'm really glad Manu's explanation was helpful. Thanks Manu!
I don't want to interrupt this useful thread, I'll only contribute one
piece of information in the form of an example application:
> Is this something that users actually want? How would this actually work?
[...]
> It would be helpf
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Ben Adida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's one example. This is not the only way that RDFa can be helpful,
> but it should help make things more concrete:
>
> http://developer.yahoo.com/searchmonkey/
>
> Using semantic markup in HTML (microformats and, soon, RD
Greg Houston wrote:
> I am not sure if Ben was eluding to this in the last paragraph, but to
> further complicate things SearchMonkey is not actually using RDF,
I think you're confusing two different layers.
SearchMonkey parses HTML with microformats, and soon HTML+RDFa, and
makes that data avail
Ben Adida wrote:
Greg Houston wrote:
I am not sure if Ben was eluding to this in the last paragraph, but to
further complicate things SearchMonkey is not actually using RDF,
I think you're confusing two different layers.
SearchMonkey parses HTML with microformats, and soon HTML+RDFa, and
make
Ian,
I am addressing these questions both personally and as a representative
of our company, Digital Bazaar. I am certainly not speaking in any way
for the W3C SWD, RDFa Task Force, or Microformats community.
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Manu Sporny wrote:
>> Web browsers currently d
Dan Brickley wrote:
Ben Adida wrote:
Greg Houston wrote:
I am not sure if Ben was eluding to this in the last paragraph, but to
further complicate things SearchMonkey is not actually using RDF,
I think you're confusing two different layers.
SearchMonkey parses HTML with microformats, and so
Hi Ian,
The second part of the replies to your questions regarding RDFa are
below. Note that the list of technical merits I was affording RDFa was
not meant to be exhaustive and I won't be adding to them in the body of
this particular e-mail. There are additional ones, however, and we can
get a mo
Here's a quick 8 minute RDFa Basics video for those of you that are not
familiar with how RDF and RDFa work. I'm posting this in an attempt to
bring those that are unfamiliar with these concepts up to speed.
RDFa Basics (8 minutes)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldl0m-5zLz4
-- manu
--
Manu Spor
17 matches
Mail list logo
