On Sun, 10 May 2009 12:32:34 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Page 3:
h2My Catsh2
dl
dtSchrouml;dinger
dd item=com.damowmow.cat
meta property=com.damowmow.name content=Schrouml;dinger
meta property=com.damowmow.age content=9
p
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:40 AM, João Eiras jo...@opera.com wrote:
The suggestion of marking content as non-executable doesn't solve anything,
because after setting innerStaticHTML another script might serialize a piece
of the affected DOM to string and back to a tree, and the code could then
Ian Hickson:
USE CASE: Annotate structured data that HTML has no semantics for, and
which nobody has annotated before, and may never again, for private use or
use in a small self-contained community.
(..)
SCENARIOS:
Between the scenarios should be considered also this case:
* a user
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Giovanni Gentili
giovanni.gent...@gmail.com wrote:
* a user (or groups of users) wants to annotate
items present on a generic web page with
additional properties in a certain vocabulary.
for example Joe wants to gather in a blog
a series of personal annotation
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Adam Barth wha...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Kristof Zelechovski
giecr...@stegny.2a.pl wrote:
If toStaticHTML prunes everything it is not sure of, the danger of a
known
language construct suddenly introducing active content is
On Sun, 10 May 2009, Manu Sporny wrote:
Shelley Powers wrote:
Since a new section detailing HTML5's handling of custom microdata has
been added to the HTML5 spec
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#microdata
I've only had a brief chance to look over the HTML5 Microdata spec,
On 06.05.2009, at 17:31, Adam Barth wrote:
WHY NOT toStaticHTML?
toStaticHTML addresses the same use cause by translating an untrusted
string to another string that lacks active HTML content. This API has
two issues:
1) The untrusted string - static string - HTML parser workflow
requires the
Are expando / prototype functions at all included in the HTML 5 specs?
While we may all know what Object.prototype does, I'd like to see its
use added to
Section 6: Web browsers.
The Prototype Expando is not necessarily a Javascript-only construct,
and neither is HTML 5.
While I'm not
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Charles Pritchard wrote:
Are expando / prototype functions at all included in the HTML 5 specs?
Yes. Specifically, HTML5 uses WebIDL for all its definitions of
interfaces, objects, etc, and the WebIDL spec defines how prototypes,
custom properties, etc, work:
A cursory glance on the new section 5 raises two questions on
indirection:
(Note the metas in the last example -- since sometimes the
information
isn't visible, rather than requiring that people put it in and hide it
with display:none, which has a rather poor accessibility story, I
10 matches
Mail list logo
