On Thu, 06 May 2010 23:36:00 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
My suggestion was to fall back to using a standard text input field and
use JavaScript to add the date picker which will allow the user to
enter the date manually if so desired. Are there any current plans to
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
| # a date-fullyear is defined as four or more digits
| representing a number greater than 0
I read that as to . Is there a different interpretation of that?
Surely is not greater than 0?
establish a WebSocket connection
[[
28. Read bytes from the server until either the connection closes, or a
0x0A byte is read. Let field be these bytes, including the 0x0A byte.
If field is not at least seven bytes long, or if the last two bytes aren't
0x0D and 0x0A respectively, or if it
I think using the role attribute is the best solution here:
input type=text role=username
input type=email role=username
This way we're using the type attribute to indicate what sort of data
is being entered, and the role attribute to indicate how it will be
used. I think the separation of these
Am 07.05.2010 00:30 schrieb Schalk Neethling:
Just to rectify any misunderstanding, I love the date picker that Opera
provides and others will hopefully do in turn but, my question is that
currently using type=date only provides the option of selecting a date using
the date picker. In a
establish a WebSocket connection
[[
41. ...
If the entry's name is set-cookie or set-cookie2 or another
cookie-related field name
If the relevant specification is supported by the user agent, handle the
cookie as defined by the appropriate specification, with the resource
being the one
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:44 AM, juuso_ht...@tele3d.net wrote:
meta=encrypt pubkey=ABABAEFEF2626EFEFEF
pubtool=EC256-AES|RSA2048-AES
passsalt=no|domainname auth=verisign
I see a few shortcomings in this approach:
a) each document is encrypted asymmetrically, affecting performance.
b) there is
I was expecting criticism; as is unavoidable with all crypto issues.
You asked many questions, and unfortunately all you missed the
auth=verisign argument, which _is_ enough to prevent all practical
(,even if they are all theoretical!,) man-in-the-middle attacks.
html
head
meta encrypt
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 17:06 +, Juuso Hukkanen wrote:
answer 1:
Most servers are already configured to read the requested pages
before
submitting those over the internet.
What do you base this on? I can't say I've ever seen a server set up to
parse HTML content
For example my above
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Schalk Neethling sch...@ossreleasefeed.com
wrote:
Greetings,
Are there any talks at the moment whether the type=date input will allow a
user to enter a date manually or use the date picker or, should developers
fall back to using a standard input field and
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Schalk Neethling
sch...@ossreleasefeed.com wrote:
Hey TJ, I understand what type=date is supposed to offer the user and agree
that using Modernizr to detect whether the element is supported and provide a
fallback but my more direct question is, would HTML 5
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Juuso Hukkanen juuso_ht...@tele3d.net wrote:
You asked many questions, and unfortunately all you missed the
auth=verisign argument, which _is_ enough to prevent all practical (,even
if they are all theoretical!,) man-in-the-middle attacks.
You haven't explained
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Juuso Hukkanen juuso_ht...@tele3d.net wrote:
1) Man-in-the-middle problem; which doesn't exists because
a) those are just academic mind games
You don't get to talk about security anymore.
~TJ
On May 6, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Edward O'Connor wrote:
Consider how the above would work in legacy browsers, and then consider
how this would work in them:
pAs Ashley Crandall Amos says in citea
href=http://example.com/books/crandall/linguisticmeans;Linguistic Means of
Determining the Dates
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:21 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Juuso Hukkanen juuso_ht...@tele3d.net
wrote:
1) Man-in-the-middle problem; which doesn't exists because
a) those are just academic mind games
You don't get to talk about security anymore.
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Juuso Hukkanen juuso_ht...@tele3d.net
wrote:
1) Man-in-the-middle problem; which doesn't exists because
a) those are just academic mind games
You don't get to talk about
16 matches
Mail list logo
