On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> For we already define the /favicon.ico fallback. If a
> page lacks we should probably also look at
> Apple's proprietary extension here given that it's quite widely
> adopted. Chrome supports it and there is some work going on in Firefo
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> That seems like it'd be no more complicated, but would involve less new
> API surface (not to mention fewer new ways to shoot yourself in the foot,
> e.g. getting the 'fetch-as' value wrong), and wouldn't require us to come
> up with a way to e
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Ben Maurer wrote:
> To follow this up with a concrete suggestion:
>
> var myfetch = window.fetch('my.css', {'fetch-as': 'stylesheet'});
> myfetch.then(function(resp) {
> document.body.appendChild(resp.body.asStyleSheet());
> });
If you have 'fetch-as' you need a
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> Why not:
>
>var mystyle = E('link', { rel: 'stylesheet', href: 'my.css', whenneeded:
> true });
>document.body.appendChild(mystyle);
>var myfetch = mystyle.fetch;
>...
>
> ...where "E()" is some mechanism to easily create new e
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Takeshi Yoshino wrote:
> "process response body" in the XHR spec is only handling errors and firing a
> readystatechange event and ProgressEvents. "response" in the XHR spec [1] is
> set to the argument "response" of "process response" hook. I think this
> "set" me
On 07/28/2014 06:34, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
Sorry for the delay in responding. Your message fell through the
cracks in my e-mail filters.
On 07/17/2014 08:26 AM, duanyao wrote:
Hi,
My first question is about a rule in MIME Sniffing specification
(http://mimesniff.spec.whatwg.org):
5.
On 07/28/2014 08:01 AM, duanyao wrote:
On 07/28/2014 06:34, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
Sorry for the delay in responding. Your message fell through the
cracks in my e-mail filters.
On 07/17/2014 08:26 AM, duanyao wrote:
Hi,
My first question is about a rule in MIME Sniffing specification
(http:
Chrome 30 dropped support[1] for fetching apple-touch-icon-* from well
known URLs, since the 404 pages that are usually returned were consuming
3-4% of all mobile bandwidth usage[2]. We're unlikely to reverse that.
We still support apple-touch-icon-* via link rel under some circumstances
(e.g. for
Using a single JPEG/PNG that is also part of the home page display is a way
to mitigate bandwidth used.
Another way to do this is to use an SVG for a logo - which browsers support
this now?
On 28 Jul 2014 07:59, "John Mellor" wrote:
> Chrome 30 dropped support[1] for fetching apple-touch-icon-* f
On 07/28/2014 22:08, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
On 07/28/2014 08:01 AM, duanyao wrote:
On 07/28/2014 06:34, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
Sorry for the delay in responding. Your message fell through the
cracks in my e-mail filters.
On 07/17/2014 08:26 AM, duanyao wrote:
Hi,
My first question is abo
There's two things the Fullscreen API does:
1. Resize the top-level browsing context's document's viewport. (I.e.
resizing the window of the browser.)
2. Change state of that document and its descendant documents.
1 needs to happen asynchronously. 2 needs to happen from a task
per-document. Poten
Since the entire Notification object is exposed both on window and in
workers, I'd like some clarification on the intended behavior of
Notification.requestPermission() when called in the background.
http://notifications.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-notification-requestpermission
Some options:
(1) Re
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Peter Beverloo wrote:
> Any opinions?
I prefer (4), add [Exposed=Window].
--
http://annevankesteren.nl/
That'd work for me too.
Peter
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Peter Beverloo
> wrote:
> > Any opinions?
>
> I prefer (4), add [Exposed=Window].
>
>
> --
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > Why not:
> >
> >var mystyle = E('link', { rel: 'stylesheet', href: 'my.css', whenneeded:
> > true });
> >document.body.appendChild(mystyle);
> >var myfetch = mystyle.fetch;
> >.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Peter Beverloo wrote:
> That'd work for me too.
Done:
https://github.com/whatwg/notifications/commit/cd7c05b55faa8580287f3afd9e9f011df5eefa37
--
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>>var mystyle = E('link', { rel: 'stylesheet', href: 'my.css', whenneeded:
>>> true });
>>>document.body.appendChild(mystyle);
>>>
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> >>>var mystyle = E('link', { rel: 'stylesheet', href: 'my.css',
> >>> whenneeded:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> >>>var mystyle = E('link', { rel: 'stylesheet', href: 'my.css',
> whe
Can you explain what experiment you could run to determine whether (2)
happens synchronously or asynchronously?
Adam
On Jul 28, 2014 9:03 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" wrote:
> There's two things the Fullscreen API does:
>
> 1. Resize the top-level browsing context's document's viewport. (I.e.
> resi
What about initial parameters to fetch (vs modifications you could make in
flight via the myfetch object). Would there be an attribute of that
you could use to pass parameters to fetch (eg a custom header)?
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Anne van Ke
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> Can you explain what experiment you could run to determine whether (2)
> happens synchronously or asynchronously?
I'm not sure I understand the question.
Do you mean if you can observe that the tasks in different documents
might run at the sam
Caveat: I'm not really familiar with the fullscreen API implementation in
Chrome.
I imagine the synchronous checks would be implemented with a sync IPC from
the requesting renderer to the browser (which implies the browser process
must keep track of the fullscreen enabled flag and whether or not t
On Jul 28, 2014 10:58 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> > Can you explain what experiment you could run to determine whether (2)
> > happens synchronously or asynchronously?
>
> I'm not sure I understand the question.
>
> Do you mean if you ca
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> (How are animation frames synchronized across
> boundaries?)
>
requestAnimationFrame specifies that the callback fires for all iframes
within the same task, but it's not black-box observable between
cross-origin iframes so it doesn't m
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Ben Maurer wrote:
>
> What about initial parameters to fetch (vs modifications you could make
> in flight via the myfetch object). Would there be an attribute of
> that you could use to pass parameters to fetch (eg a custom header)?
What's the use case here? Why are we tryi
The idea is you could specify any parameter to fetch. For example, if fetch
allowed you to specify an HTTP/2 priority, you could specify that.
As a concrete example of why passing a header might be useful, Facebook
uses an automated pipeline to decide what CSS/JS files to package together.
If we c
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Ben Maurer wrote:
>
> The idea is you could specify any parameter to fetch. For example, if
> fetch allowed you to specify an HTTP/2 priority, you could specify that.
>
> As a concrete example of why passing a header might be useful, Facebook
> uses an automated pipeline to
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> Ah, I see. Makes sense.
>
> Are there any cases where you'd know the headers you want to send at the
> time the markup is written, before JS is involved, or would you always be
> updating the fetch settings from script?
I think there are c
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> What's the use case here? Why are we trying to send custom headers on a
> ?
E.g. for and such you want to turn authentication dialogs off.
Cross-origin images can be fine, but not if they start spawning
confusing dialogs to users making them
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> I meant a black-box experiment (i.e., no access to browser internal state).
> Put another way, can you describe a sequence of events in which the author
> or the user could observe the difference? If not, then the question is
> moot.
Well if b
31 matches
Mail list logo
