[whatwg] W3C Timed Text Working Group proposal for HTMLCue

[Resending after subscribing to WHATWG list - apologies for the noise] Dear WhatWG, Jer, Eric, Silvia, Philip, W3C Timed Text Working Group kindly requests you to consider the following proposal: - What? - We propose to specify an implementation of the

Re: [whatwg] W3C Timed Text Working Group proposal for HTMLCue

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Nigel Megitt wrote: > >On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Nigel Megitt wrote: > >> > >> We think an HTML cue as a variant of the third option is the best > >> solution. > > > >If you do this please make sure to define in detail how it should all > >work. > > Are you commenting that it

Re: [whatwg] W3C Timed Text Working Group proposal for HTMLCue

(Please don't cross-post to the WHATWG list -- either post to the WHATWG list, or post to other lists, but not both at the same time. It causes threads to fragment as people aren't on all the lists.) On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Nigel Megitt wrote: > > We think an HTML cue as a variant of the third

Re: [whatwg] W3C Timed Text Working Group proposal for HTMLCue

On 11/09/2015 00:11, "Ian Hickson" wrote: >(Please don't cross-post to the WHATWG list -- either post to the WHATWG >list, or post to other lists, but not both at the same time. It causes >threads to fragment as people aren't on all the lists.) Noted - in this case it's not a