On 1/25/17 10:48 PM, Florian Rivoal wrote:
Is it a general argument that adding more things to the platform always makes
it harder down the road to add more things due to having to figure out more
interactions
It's not a general argument in this case. It's a specific argument.
For example,
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 12:23, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>
> It will complicate attempts to add other, much higher value, features to
> CSS, again both in terms of specification and implementation.
Could you elaborate on that? Is it a general argument that adding more things
to
at:
https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-display-3-20170125/#changes
We anticipate this being the last draft before the transition to CR,
therefore this is the "last call" for comments.
Please review the draft, and send any comments to the CSSWG mailing list,
<www-st...@w3.org>, prefixed w
On 1/25/17 8:14 PM, fantasai wrote:
* a 'run-in' layout model slightly less insane than the one proposed
in CSS2.0
I like the truth in advertising there. ;)
I'd just like to reiterate my (longstanding, so unlikely to sway anyone)
opinion that run-in, even in this "less insane"