://svn.whatwg.org but I just get web pages with the text
(literally) of the current revision of the specs, rather than access to the
history logs that WA1 implies I should find there. Neither web browsers nor
svn itself can talk to that URI. Am I doing something wrong or is it
broken?
--
Stewart
Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/7/06, Stewart Brodie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought I'd have a go at implementing the parsing algorithms,
specifically the tree construction algorithms, to see what effect it had
on the DOM trees that our parser creates. Has anybody else
be executed automatically when opening the next formatting/phrasing
element or text node anyway)
--
Stewart Brodie
Software Engineer
ANT Software Limited
Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Stewart Brodie wrote:
I tried dry-running the algorithm for handling mis-nested formatting
elements, but I ended up with a tree that looked very odd. I can't
believe that the output I ended up with is what the desired result
a step 14 that looped the whole algorithm, perhaps? I think you can
strike the first paragraph of step 3, and move the second paragraph of step
3 into step 4, and remove the sentence There will always be one ... from
step 4, then delete step 3 completely.
--
Stewart Brodie
Software Engineer
ANT
the author thought was going on. Did they
think it was XHTML and just got stymied by the server configuration?
I'm still in favour of permitting the trailing slash, personally.
--
Stewart Brodie
Software Engineer
ANT Software Limited
tested, because you
clearly cannot have tested all browsers. IE, Firefox, Safari and Opera
aren't all browsers (especially if you only test one specific version)
--
Stewart Brodie
Software Engineer
ANT Software Limited
have to find another solution.
(Similarly -- Opera, Mozilla, et al, don't want to implement H.264. So we
have to find a solution other than H.264.)
Is there any codec that would satisfy everybody? I doubt it, to be honest.
--
Stewart Brodie
Software Engineer
ANT Software Limited
.
--
Stewart Brodie
Software Engineer
ANT Software Limited
/getElementsByClassName/) but given the
dates on them predate the latest spec changes (which causes some to fail
now), I was wondering if up to date versions are now kept somewhere else
instead?
--
Stewart Brodie
Software Engineer
ANT Software Limited
Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:25:33 +0100, Stewart Brodie
stewart.bro...@antplc.com wrote:
Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote (on 25 July 2008):
I've made [getElementsByClassName] consistent with how classes work in
CSS
(case-insensitive for quirks
out of date.
* updates the test now.
Excellent - thanks!
--
Stewart Brodie
Software Engineer
ANT Software Limited
. They are called in registration order, from oldest
to newest. This is stated in both the latest D3E working draft, and the
older versions dating back to 2003 (at least - I didn't go back any further)
--
Stewart Brodie
Software Engineer
ANT Software Limited
must be callable. The only difference
that this makes, I *think*, is that pages in the history lose unreferenced
EventSource objects. Is this true and would it actually be a problem?
--
Stewart Brodie
Software Engineer
ANT Software Limited
5.0.307.11 beta, Firefox 3.5.8, and our own ANT
Galio 3.1.0
--
Stewart Brodie
Team Leader - ANT Galio Browser
ANT Software Limited
my test so that it
tries both.
The behaviour seems to be the same, regardless of how the option is created.
--
Stewart Brodie
Team Leader - ANT Galio Browser
ANT Software Limited
Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 3/3/10 12:11 PM, Stewart Brodie wrote:
As far as I can tell, this affects: HTMLSelectElement.add(),
HTMLOptionsCollection.add(), Node.appendChild(), Node.replaceChild(),
Node.insertBefore().
Is it option-specific, though? Last I checked, various
Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:27:23 +0100, Stewart Brodie
stewart.bro...@antplc.com wrote:
Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 3/3/10 12:11 PM, Stewart Brodie wrote:
As far as I can tell, this affects: HTMLSelectElement.add
on a separate processor), we do not have
access to most of the information that is necessary to drive the algorithms.
For example, network usage (if indeed there is any at all), which frames you
have, seekable ranges, buffering statistics - all of these are unavailable.
--
Stewart Brodie
Team Leader
? The typographic convention
description set out in section 1.8.2 doesn't say either way.
Do getters need to be called to obtain a value which can be stored (after
being cloned itself) in the result?
--
Stewart Brodie
Team Leader - ANT Galio Browser
ANT Software Limited
Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2011, Stewart Brodie wrote:
Do getters need to be called to obtain a value which can be stored
(after being cloned itself) in the result?
I'm not sure I follow the question. Can you elaborate?
Are getters called during cloning? i.e. what
Johan Sundström oyas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody!
Serializing a complete HTML document DOM to a string is surprisingly
hard in javascript.
Does XMLSerializer().serializeToString(document) not meet your requirement?
--
Stewart Brodie
Team Leader - ANT Galio Browser
ANT Software
It doesn't necessarily. I've come across pages that expect the head to be
displayed too. e.g. tests at http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/tests/css3/ like
http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/tests/css3/show.php?p=caption-side
--
Stewart Brodie
Team Leader - ANT Galio Browser
ANT Software Limited
Is this a common mark up pattern?
I've not gone looking for any other real-world examples - that's the only
one I've seen. However, I can't think of any reason why it shouldn't work,
as it's just a block box like the body element (usually) is.
--
Stewart Brodie
Team Leader - ANT Galio Browser
ANT Software
.
--
Stewart Brodie
Team Leader - ANT Galio Browser
ANT Software Limited
. I've put a suitably anonymised version of the test
case on my own website:
http://www.metahusky.net/~stewart/css/br/br-rendering.html
And yes, the real page really did have the first line of its stylesheet as:
* { position: absolute; margin: 0px; float: left }
--
Stewart Brodie
Team
26 matches
Mail list logo
