Re: [whatwg] [proposal] Gallery element

Hi Hans, et al. _IF there is consensus that this IS worth investigating, then I'd gladly help_ _write up a few proposals and sample implementations._ agree. _A gallery should be a _a series of related pictures which have a combined topic,_ _as well as an individual message.__ agree. I

Re: [whatwg] [proposal] Gallery element

> Domenic Denicola hat am 13. Juli 2016 um 15:14 geschrieben: > > Thanks for the thoughtful description of the problem! If you haven't seen it > before, > https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#Is_there_a_process_for_adding_new_features_to_a_specification.3F > has a description of

Re: [whatwg] [proposal] Gallery element

Thanks for the reply Jonathan. > Jonathan Zuckerman hat am 13. Juli 2016 um 14:36 > geschrieben: > > Hi Hans, I'm not an important figure at all in the web world, but my > intuition is this isn't a good candidate for a new feature in HTML. You've > done a good job of

Re: [whatwg] [proposal] Gallery element

From: whatwg [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Hans Schmucker > Right now this is little more than a description of a problem with a rough > outline how a solution could work, so there are obviously a lot of issues not > discussed in this proposal. What I'd like to discuss

Re: [whatwg] [proposal] Gallery element

Hi Hans, I'm not an important figure at all in the web world, but my intuition is this isn't a good candidate for a new feature in HTML. You've done a good job of abstracting the problem and exploring the edge cases but the feature is just too specific. I doubt browser vendors would want to

[whatwg] [proposal] Gallery element

Note: I've already sent this to the W3C public-html list, and while there hasn't been any response so far, it is possible that issues will be raised on both channels. The original message along with replies is available at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2016Jul/0011.html .