This seems quite simple to me: Use URLs to convey app state.
Zac Spitzer writes:
> But what do end users or developers expect in terms of browser behavior in
> this situation?
>
> The history api (or saving state to indexedDB) aren't going to solve the
> problem of
> On Jun 9, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Zac Spitzer wrote:
>
> But what do end users or developers expect in terms of browser behavior in
> this situation?
>
> The history api (or saving state to indexedDB) aren't going to solve the
> problem of reinitialization everytime the user
I'm pretty sure it's out of scope. That's really asking to specify how OS-level
task switching works. I imagine that Safari-wrapper or whatever has decided
that when the OS switches back to it it will do a reload, just like when I
switch back to my mail app it does a sync, and other stuff like
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Zac Spitzer zac.spit...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it within the scope of the spec to specify whether home screen web apps
should
retain their loaded state when switching from foreground to background and
back to foreground again?
Chrome behaves exactly as expected,
But what do end users or developers expect in terms of browser behavior in
this situation?
The history api (or saving state to indexedDB) aren't going to solve the
problem of reinitialization everytime the user switches back to a web app.
Users expect them to behave like a native app.
The early