Re: Application#destroy()

2007-06-20 Thread Maurice Marrink
ah, i'd rather have the rename. I have absolutly no problem with a > rename as long as it is announced on the mailing list. But i don't > think Martijn is going to allow that before 1.3.0 is out. But for my > part make the change whenever you want. > > Maurice > > > On 6

Re: [announce] Apache Wicket

2007-06-20 Thread Maurice Marrink
Congratulations to everyone for making Apache Wicket a success. Maurice On 6/20/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We have Graduation! Apache Wicket is established as a top level project within the Apache Software Foundation. From Greg Stein: Original Message ---

Re: Application#destroy()

2007-06-20 Thread Maurice Marrink
don't think Martijn is going to allow that before 1.3.0 is out. But for my part make the change whenever you want. Maurice On 6/20/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/20/07, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whatever makes you happy :) > I see J

Re: Application#destroy()

2007-06-20 Thread Maurice Marrink
x27;t warn about missing override methods. Maurice On 6/20/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: yes, that makes sense. howevern, i still like ondestroy() better then destroy(). ondestroy() makes it clear it is a listener. -igor On 6/20/07, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: Application#destroy()

2007-06-20 Thread Maurice Marrink
Actually there is also a protected internalDestroy (still not final though) which calls destroy so why not put callDestroyers there ? Maurice On 6/20/07, Sean Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 On 6/20/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From the Application#destroy() javadoc: > > /*

Re: custom dependencies on bamboo

2007-06-20 Thread Maurice Marrink
. the repository you specified does not have a jar available for the jta dependency. http://repo.mergere.com/maven2/javax/transaction/jta/1.0.1B/ just the POM is uploaded. On 6/19/07, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That is weird because the jar is definitely available on

Re: custom dependencies on bamboo

2007-06-19 Thread Maurice Marrink
pendency to my own public repo: http://maven.codecrate.com/ On 6/19/07, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you add the following repository to your pom, you won't need to > install it locally. > > mergere > Mergere Maestro Repository

Re: Problem with latest changes in FormComponent:validate()

2007-06-19 Thread Maurice Marrink
more logical would imo be if the validators could be chained and then let them deside if they want to do And or Or logic. But i have never worked with validators before so i am not sure if this already possible or not. my 2c Maurice On 6/19/07, Jan Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The cod

Re: custom dependencies on bamboo

2007-06-18 Thread Maurice Marrink
If you add the following repository to your pom, you won't need to install it locally. mergere Mergere Maestro Repository http://repo.mergere.com/maven2 Maurice On 6/19/07, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Lovely maven repositories... I'm trying to enable a hibe

Re: private inner class of compoundpropertymodel

2007-06-17 Thread Maurice Marrink
Ok. Maurice On 6/17/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is exactly what i am doing right now. And i have no problem if it > has to stay that way. However I thought i might be helpful for > everyone extending CompoundPropertyModel, and given the fact that none > of the methods

Re: private inner class of compoundpropertymodel

2007-06-17 Thread Maurice Marrink
u are after all thinking about extending it, and there isn't so much going on in that class) and overriding wrapOnInheritance and return an instance of your class? Eelco On 6/17/07, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, I am in the process of extending CompoundPropertyMo

private inner class of compoundpropertymodel

2007-06-17 Thread Maurice Marrink
Hi, I am in the process of extending CompoundPropertyModel and its inner class AttachedCompoundPropertyModel. However since the last is a private inner class i am forced to copy the class definition in to my own creating some code duplication. In order to prevent this duplication it would be helpf

Re: HowTo create a project on wicketstuffs jira?

2007-06-16 Thread Maurice Marrink
Igor, Could you create projects for wasp and swarm too, i seem to be a regular user on jira. Thanks, Maurice On 6/15/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: done -igor On 6/15/07, Martin Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How do I create a project "Wicket Contrib GMap2" on wicketstuff

Re: automatically marking pages as stateless: is this really a good idea?

2007-06-14 Thread Maurice Marrink
Then i must be missing something here :s. The api doc clearly states: /** * Force binding this session to the application's * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISessionStore session store} if not already done so. * * A Wicket application can operate in a session-less mode as long as * stateless pages are used. S

Re: automatically marking pages as stateless: is this really a good idea?

2007-06-14 Thread Maurice Marrink
and there is always Session.bind(); On 6/14/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: he just has to call dirty() when he alters a session and wants to store it On 6/14/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm wondering whether it still is a good idea to automatically mark >

Re: New WicketStuff developer: Grégory Maes

2007-06-11 Thread Maurice Marrink
Hi, welcome on board. Maurice On 6/11/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear developers, Please welcome Grégory Maes among the WicketStuff developers. Grégory has filed [1]several patches on WicketStuff Dojo, and has shown a long-term interest in this project. He no

Re: case insensitive check for attributes?

2007-05-31 Thread Maurice Marrink
The main problem is not the time it took to fix, but the fact that i accidentally stumbled on a page not working anymore because a coworker had changed the java code from new SimpleAttributeModifier("onClick", ...) to "onclick" innocently expecting his change would not have any effect. You don't w

Re: case insensitive check for attributes?

2007-05-30 Thread Maurice Marrink
Now that's a good idea Johan :) Maurice On 5/30/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: that would also be my fix. Just lower case everything once when loading and we are done. Then also lower case the AttributeModifiers and these problems are gone. does somebody disagree? johan On 5

Re: Please welcome Jean-Baptiste to the Wicket PPMC!!

2007-05-30 Thread Maurice Marrink
Ah bananaman, this brings back memories :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbPxRAeClJA Congratz, Maurice On 5/30/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Welcome :) I wonder if code monkeys eats bananamen? Frank On 5/30/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Close observers to

Re: Japan picks up on Wicket

2007-05-29 Thread Maurice Marrink
I like the wicket logo they are using on that site :) Wonder what vincent thinks of it ;) Maurice On 5/30/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is some real activity regarding Wicket in Japan. It is hard for a westerner like myself to come to grips with it, but stories like thes

Re: Wicket graduation proposal passes the Incubator PMC

2007-05-27 Thread Maurice Marrink
Congratulations. Maurice On 5/27/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kudos to the whole team and community! Wish you the best for the future of the project! Xavier On 5/27/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All, > > I just wanted to let you know that the Wicket gradua

Re: New Wicket-Stuff project, Wicket-Security

2007-05-21 Thread Maurice Marrink
apps. Maurice On 5/21/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Whoohoo are you going to use it now yourself! ;) or stick with the always so nice to have JAAS! johan On 5/21/07, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, all > > With the help of Martijn i

New Wicket-Stuff project, Wicket-Security

2007-05-21 Thread Maurice Marrink
icket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-security-swarm Maurice Marrink

Re: Java EE 5 support for wicket pages

2006-12-18 Thread Maurice Marrink
t asking out of curiosity since it should work. Maurice On 12/18/06, Filippo Diotalevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/18/06, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey nice work, > Just the other day i had put something together myself, and now i find > more people h

Re: Java EE 5 support for wicket pages

2006-12-18 Thread Maurice Marrink
Hey nice work, Just the other day i had put something together myself, and now i find more people have the need for ejb. I just wonder how is it that your ejb's are available in the initialcontext when your web.xml has the wrong version. I needed the following in my web.xml to get it to work : h