Re: [Wicket-develop] Wicket development list moved to apache

2006-10-05 Thread Upayavira
Maurice Marrink wrote: > seems there is no mailbox with that name. Did you get caught out by the unfortunate word-wrapping? It should be: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Upayavira > On 10/2/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The Wicket development mailinglist has been move

Re: [Wicket-develop] [Wicket-user] SVN structure

2006-09-27 Thread Upayavira
.php/Wicketsvn Martijn, After a long, lengthy and painful discussion to arrive at the above, I'd just like to say well done, it reads very clearly and all makes good sense :-) Upayavira - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Infl

Re: [Wicket-develop] Developing a Wicket CMS

2006-09-15 Thread Upayavira
y up to date as the reference implementation. But, better check on the jackrabbit mailing list to know for sure. Upayavira > On 9/15/06, *Eelco Hillenius* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > On 9/15/06, Ted Roeloffzen <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [Wicket-develop] If construct

2006-08-30 Thread Upayavira
ode, not in the template. IMO this makes the templates sooo much more readable. Regards, Upayavira - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated tec

[Wicket-develop] [Fwd: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Wicket into the Incubator]

2006-08-28 Thread Upayavira
o ask. Congratulations to the Wicket community, I hope it proves to be productive. Regards, Upayavira Original Message Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Wicket into the Incubator Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:30:08 +0100 From: Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: general@incubator

Re: [Wicket-develop] New svn repo structure

2006-08-25 Thread Upayavira
uses the old URL, don't just delete and re-checkout, us 'svn switch', which you can use to switch your checkout to the new repo location. Regards, Upayavira - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web se

Re: [Wicket-develop] [VOTE] New svn repo structure resolving confusion for Wicket 1.x branches

2006-08-24 Thread Upayavira
lease process maybe), but code in 'branches' may change regularly. Anyhow, I think we're suffering from too many cooks right now, so unless someone asks me a question, I'm going to duck out and let Martijn/you all make what I'm sure will be good decisions. Upayavira >

Re: [Wicket-develop] [VOTE] New svn repo structure resolving confusion for Wicket 1.x branches

2006-08-23 Thread Upayavira
what >> should they use? > > It depends on their purpose: do they want the starting point to build > patches against, or rebuild the exact release? Or just use the source > provided in the distribution? /releases _IS_ tagging the exact version. Regards, Upayavira ---

Re: [Wicket-develop] [VOTE] New svn repo structure resolving confusion for Wicket 1.x branches

2006-08-20 Thread Upayavira
directory. That, I believe, would give the clarification that Martijn (welcome back from hols) is looking for. Upayavira - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with

Re: [Wicket-develop] apache wicket?

2006-08-03 Thread Upayavira
g with interfacing non ASL-compatible code with Wicket - it is just important that users are aware of the licensing consequences of doing so. > Don't get me wrong, I think wicket would gain a lot by becoming by > joining apache. Well