Looks like it was a bug in the first place, so that could be fixed for
1.2.3 too.
Eelco
On 9/6/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so getCallbackUrl(Enum) (in 2.0)
>
> but in 1.3 i just want it to be the inverse for what it is now. (maybe even
> in 1.2.3 if it was me because this
>
so getCallbackUrl(Enum) (in 2.0)but in 1.3 i just want it to be the inverse for what it is now. (maybe even in 1.2.3 if it was me because thiscan cause bugs that are very hard to spot)johan
On 9/6/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yes, it is. i was meaning to clean up those two booleans
yes, it is. i was meaning to clean up those two booleans into a masked value with constants, just havent had a chance yet.-IgorOn 9/6/06, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah. Looks like a typo to me.EelcoOn 9/6/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Why is that this:>> /**
Yeah. Looks like a typo to me.
Eelco
On 9/6/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is that this:
>
> /**
> * Gets the url that references this handler.
> *
> * @return the url that references this handler
> */
> public CharSequence getCallbackUrl()
>
Why is that this: /** * Gets the url that references this handler. * * @return the url that references this handler */ public CharSequence getCallbackUrl() { return getCallbackUrl(true, false);
}calling this method:public final CharSequence getCallbackUrl(final
