* Ingram Chen:
> we shouldlet WicketTester just delegatecall to
> targetApplcation. I believe it's possible but it will break
> exist test because WicketTester is no longer a WebApplication
> and things such as DummyHomePage will be not availiable...
Right, we need t
i guess a possible solution for appication stuff might look like an ibehavior but targetted for an application instead of a component.the testing is another matter. i started working on a test solution that allows testing by mocking wicketservlet instead of mocking application. but i didnt have any
hmm... I agree with Quenot, we should let WicketTester just delegate call to targetApplcation. I believe it's possible but it will break exist test because WicketTester is no longer a WebApplication and things such as DummyHomePage will be not availiable...
On 8/22/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PR
We have similar issues with XXXApplication. SpringApplication used to
(but no longer) required init() code, AuthenticatedWebApplications
does and in the future others may be added. I think an RFE exists
already which asks for improvement. We haven't come up with a general
solution though, a solutio
