Re: [Wicket-develop] feature freeze for 1.2 branch

2006-08-31 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Not needed anymore; I did that myself two days ago. 1.2.x can be ditched. Eelco On 8/30/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1, but who is going to merge those commits Eelco *rightfully* did in 1.2.x? > > Martijn > > On 8/30/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > wicket-1

Re: [Wicket-develop] feature freeze for 1.2 branch

2006-08-31 Thread Frank Bille
I'll do it tonight. Then we can get that 1.2.x closed for now.So please don't commit anything more to 1.2.x. FrankOn 8/31/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1, but who is going to merge those commits Eelco *rightfully* did in 1.2.x?MartijnOn 8/30/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Wicket-develop] feature freeze for 1.2 branch

2006-08-30 Thread Martijn Dashorst
+1, but who is going to merge those commits Eelco *rightfully* did in 1.2.x? Martijn On 8/30/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wicket-1.2.2 is pretty much feature complete, and its time to concentrate on > wicket-1.3 > > working on 1.3 means committing to wicket-1.x but if we do that

Re: [Wicket-develop] feature freeze for 1.2 branch

2006-08-30 Thread Gwyn Evans
+1 On 29/08/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wicket-1.2.2 is pretty much feature complete, and its time to concentrate on > wicket-1.3 > > working on 1.3 means committing to wicket-1.x but if we do that now it means > we have to branch wicket and have > wicket-1.x <-- head for 1.3 >

Re: [Wicket-develop] feature freeze for 1.2 branch

2006-08-29 Thread Frank Bille
+1On 8/30/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/29/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> wicket-1.2.2 is pretty much feature complete, and its time to concentrate on> wicket-1.3> > working on 1.3 means committing to wicket-1.x but if we do that now it means> we have to branch

Re: [Wicket-develop] feature freeze for 1.2 branch

2006-08-29 Thread Eelco Hillenius
On 8/29/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wicket-1.2.2 is pretty much feature complete, and its time to concentrate on > wicket-1.3 > > working on 1.3 means committing to wicket-1.x but if we do that now it means > we have to branch wicket and have > wicket-1.x <-- head for 1.3 > wicke

Re: [Wicket-develop] feature freeze for 1.2 branch

2006-08-29 Thread Johan Compagner
yeah just wait a week and see where we end before starting to do things in 3 branches.johanOn 8/30/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:wicket-1.2.2 is pretty much feature complete, and its time to concentrate on wicket-1.3working on 1.3 means committing to wicket-1.x but if we do that now