I did some more research for bug #1237966 and it turns out
handling this problem isn't so straight-forward. Tomcat's
ClientAbortException makes the classic mistake of defining
getThrowable() without overriding getCause() to return that same
exception.
I hope you also reported this to th
Ow yes please, I me just thinking it was me doing it al wrong.
I have written a ant build script that also re - deployes the
application after a build. But it did not work. (while it did with al
the other webapps I have written (non wicket))
Is this the same problem, that I cannot unload (delete
Same here,
A +1 on #2
Ryan Sonnek wrote:
+1 to postpone the release and get the error message in
On 10/26/05, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#: Eelco Hillenius changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 10/26/2005
7:21 PM :#
Anyone that reads the dev list and has
+1 for this ;)
SourceForge.net wrote:
Bugs item #1400778, was opened at 2006-01-09 22:27
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684975&aid=1400778&group_id=119783
Please note th
Because I needed the functionality I used the pseudo code provided by
Johan to alter Link to accommodate the Anchor attribute.
I called it anchor because basically you want to jump to an anchor tag,
I agree with Eelco (in
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Link-to-Anchor-p4345613.html) that anchor
is
Eelco,
I do have a question. Does this implementation not limit me to
components(anchors) on the current page/panel only?
How would I use this component based anchor in the following use case?
Say I have 2 pages.
page1 contains a list of recently added comments on blog posts. (some
global ove
ed so far.
>
> This should be enough to cover any use case you have. In your case,
> you might even implement your original proposal yourself; set your
> custom component as an anchor, and do what you want with your custom
> implementation of appendAnchor.
>
>
> Eelco
>
I do, This would imply that you also make 1.3 java 5. I am/was hoping
that this would stay on java 1.4.x. I don't know how this is voted
inside the dev team. But I would really like it if the generics(java 5)
part stay's in the 2.x branch and keeping 1.x branch a 1.4 jvm version.
Igor Vaynber
