Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Problem with ResourceLink in CVS HEAD?

2005-04-23 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
I don't agree. There are two ways for a jsessionid to be provided from a browser to a servelt container. a) url parameter b) http header. I'm not really an expert on this but as far as I know it is a matter of servlet container config and the reason there are two options is because of SSL. The url

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Problem with ResourceLink in CVS HEAD?

2005-04-23 Thread Gili
I filed a bug that basically states that we should be applying the same behavior consistently across static Images and ResourceLinks to static images. Gili Juergen Donnerstag wrote: I don't agree. There are two ways for a jsessionid to be provided from a browser to a servelt container. a) url

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Problem with ResourceLink in CVS HEAD?

2005-04-23 Thread Johan Compagner
if you send a session id with the url or the header Then the image can also be stale (not cacheable) Because it is session bound So we should try to avoid a session state being attached on a image link (a static link ofcourse which doesn't change) johan Juergen Donnerstag wrote: I don't

Re: [Wicket-user] Two things that I can't understand easily, just in the HelloWord application

2005-04-23 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
Iiigo, On 4/23/05, liigo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Two things that I can't understand easily, just in the HelloWord application. With the HelloWord demo application code following: package wicket.examples.helloworld; import wicket.markup.html.WebPage; import wicket.markup.html.basic.Label;

Re: [Wicket-user] Two things that I can't understand easily, just in the HelloWord application

2005-04-23 Thread Chris Turner
liigo wrote: Two things that I can't understand easily, just in the HelloWord application. With the HelloWord demo application code following: package wicket.examples.helloworld; import wicket.markup.html.WebPage; import wicket.markup.html.basic.Label; public class HelloWorld extends WebPage {