Hi, there
This is my first post to the list so I'd like to say hello to everybody :-)
I have 1 question regarding wicket, though:
I'm generating my menu links from the database. The problem I face is
that the generated (by wicket) link is different every time so the
styles for anchors (a
You can make the links 'stable' by working with bookmarkable pages.
For the public part of your menu, that's probably a good idea anyway.
Eelco
On 9/28/05, Dorel Vaida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, there
This is my first post to the list so I'd like to say hello to everybody :-)
I have 1
Hi,
our company is considering to change our current web frontend framework.
At the moment we are using the following Open Source components.
- Hibernate
- Lucene
- Spring
- homegrown web frontend framework
After evaluating Wicket for several weeks now, I find, it could be the
ideal candidate
Hi I am using wicket for a simple app.
but I have a few constraints because the web page is to be displayed on
a i-mode phone. which has a browser that understands a sub-set of HTML.
so it does not understand wicket:id in a tag, does not understand
span, does not allow /li etc...and no
There are a couple of medium-sized deployments I know of/ worked on.
And some larger scale projects that are worked on right now.
Scalability depends on your requirements. I'm not a scalability expert
(yet), but using sticky sessions should never get you in trouble. If
you need fallover/ need you
See ApplicationSettings (setStripWicketTag iirc).
Martijn
On 9/28/05, Joshua Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I am using wicket for a simple app.
but I have a few constraints because the web page is to be displayed on
a i-mode phone. which has a browser that understands a sub-set of HTML.
so it
I meant setRenderBodyOnly(true)On 9/28/05, Joshua Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I am using wicket for a simple app.
but I have a few constraints because the web page is to be displayed on
a i-mode phone. which has a browser that understands a sub-set of HTML.
so it does not understand wicket:id
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
See ApplicationSettings (setStripWicketTag iirc).
And also make sure you have this:
getSettings().configure(deployment);, otherwise (at least for 1.1 b4)
the stripWicketTags(true) will be ignored
Martijn
On 9/28/05, *Joshua Lim* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL
try setting Link.setAutoEnable(false)
- Original Message -
From: Dorel Vaida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] hi and ... question :-)
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
You can make the links
Is there a simple but complete example, which shows how to use panels
within one Page?
Michael.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more.
I created issue
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1307190group_id=119783atid=684975
for this.
Eelco
On 9/28/05, Joachim Rudolph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
the instructions given on
http://wicket.sourceforge.net/QuickStartSource.html will not get the
examples running
I think autoenabled should default to false. Too many users are having
problems with this. Votes?
Eelco
On 9/28/05, Dipu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try setting Link.setAutoEnable(false)
- Original Message -
From: Dorel Vaida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Several. A good start is the component reference. Another nice one is
the nested examples, which shows that you can use panels recursively.
Eelco
On 9/28/05, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a simple but complete example, which shows how to use panels
within one Page?
Aye
On Sep 28, 2005, at 11:12 AM, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
I think autoenabled should default to false. Too many users are having
problems with this. Votes?
Eelco
On 9/28/05, Dipu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try setting Link.setAutoEnable(false)
- Original Message -
From: Dorel Vaida
I just made Link.isEnabled non final so that users can more easily
customize on/off behaviour. I had a problem with this myself today,
but it should also make it easier to tackle your issue.
Eelco
On 9/28/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think autoenabled should default to false.
On 9/28/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really don't think so. With browsers like IE it's easy to submit a
form with no button (hit return, for example). In this case it's nice
to put the default behavior in the form, but if it's always called you
can't do that.
Sometimes IE sends
A bit off topic, but maybe someone here will have better suggestions
than what I previously found.
I have a web application I want to keep up 100% and not lose any
sessions when I update it.
The only solution I came up with so far is to have 2 load balanced
application servers, shutdown one
I have a sort of off-topic question. I have a sort of largish app
that I'm looking to convert pieces of and hoping to use Wicket to
make things quick and simple.
so, e.g.: I have sections like support/ product/ marketing/
currently in webwork2. And using Spring for business
Do you need to share the session? And do you need it to be seperate
apps because you want to manage authorisation/ authentication in an
easy way, or do you have other reasons?
Eelco
On 9/29/05, Andrew Lombardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a sort of off-topic question. I have a sort of
while sharing the session would be nice .. it's not required .. I can
use saved cookies for any things like auth, or shared data ..
I was looking to use separate war files to combat the monolithic
nature of this app .. and what it's becoming ... I have so many DAOs
it hurts ... so I was
Typing in input directly works (it should)? Must be related to the
javascript datepicker component.
Eelco
On 9/29/05, Troy MacNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a small but frustrating problem saving dates from a form. I
enter them in the format m/d/ (this is the format returned by
First, +1 for making autolink off by default. I think just about every
newbie out there got whacked by this unexpected behavior.
The ability to override Link.isEnabled() is nice, but still doesn't fix
the autolink issue. New users will expect myLink.setEnabled(true) to
work without any
22 matches
Mail list logo
