Hi all
On 3/13/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it is ok to do that (use /* mapping) if you use WicketFilter instead of
> WicketServlet
I'm sorry but I didn't a WicketFilter class in the API nor in the
wicket examples. And the web.xml file from wicket examples seems
rather normal to
:-)
> if you disable a formcomponent then neither a set or get will be
> called
Yes. But it's not disabled, and get is being called. Just not set.
I must be doing something wrong or missing something in the impl here...
but I don't see what it is. :-(
Cheers,
Dave
> Sorry for p
if you disable a formcomponent then neither a set or get will be called
-igor
On 3/12/07, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry for pulling you guys back to my mail issue. ;-)
Since setObject() is not being called, I don't see how to apply my
complex model to its children. I though
Sorry for pulling you guys back to my mail issue. ;-)
Since setObject() is not being called, I don't see how to apply my
complex model to its children. I thought I could pull this off with
setModel()... but it just ain't being called.
Ok, let's stick with the "person" object. The person has att
Maybe it is good to gather a couple of use cases and pros and cons and
start a separate thread?
Eelco
On 3/12/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ah, but if you modify a collection that is a model object are you infact
> "changing" the object? you are not changing the reference itself
ah, but if you modify a collection that is a model object are you infact
"changing" the object? you are not changing the reference itself but you are
doing something that has sideffects.
eg lets say you have a dropdown choice, but what you want is a collection of
ids not the objects. the easiest
If you are not changing the object that is the subject of the model, I
see no reason why setObject should be called.
Eelco
On 3/12/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> actually we are inconsistent in some places and i have been trying to fix
> it. what we mostly do is whenever we work w
actually we are inconsistent in some places and i have been trying to fix
it. what we mostly do is whenever we work with a collection we clear it and
repopulate it. but we never call setobject() on the model which imho is
wrong. sometimes i have a model in between that depends on setobject()
calle
> > > now all you have to do is
> > >
> > > LoadableDetachableModel person=new LoadalbeDetachableModel(id);
> > > new CheckBox(this, "cb", new PersonCheckBoxModel(person));
> > >
> > > and everything magically works, hope it gives you some ideas.
>
> Yes, it does indeed give me many ideas. Right no
huh ?!
On 3/13/07, Michael Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, only extra small, small, medium, and medium-to-big projects. Big
projects will be supported in wicket 3.0.
On Mar 13, 2007, at 12:51 AM, Sazib wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I just want to know, is wicket suitable for a big project?
>
>
I thought everybody knew this, Jonathan I guess once mentioned it on his
weblog. And there's also another big one here
http://martijndashorst.com/blog/2007/03/10/myspace-going-wicket/
On 3/13/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i was being sarcastic :)
-igor
On 3/12/07, Jonathan Lock
do "tiny" fall before or after extra small???
-igor
On 3/12/07, Michael Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, only extra small, small, medium, and medium-to-big projects. Big
projects will be supported in wicket 3.0.
On Mar 13, 2007, at 12:51 AM, Sazib wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I just want to
setobject is called when the component needs to update the model. eg when
you submit a textfield it needs to push new input into the model and so it
calls setobject(). sometimes components that work with collections do not do
that - they simply clear the collection and add new values - this is so
No, only extra small, small, medium, and medium-to-big projects. Big
projects will be supported in wicket 3.0.
On Mar 13, 2007, at 12:51 AM, Sazib wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I just want to know, is wicket suitable for a big project?
>
> Thanks
> ---
> Sazib
>
> --
Igor,
Regarding your suggestions below:
> > class mypage extends page {
> > private Set selected=new HashSet();
> >
> > private class PersonCheckboxModel implements IModel {
> > private final IModel person;
> > public final PersonCheckBoxModel(IModel person) {
> > this.person=person; }
> >
> > p
Hi everybody,
I just want to know, is wicket suitable for a big project?
Thanks
---
Sazib
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opin
i was being sarcastic :)
-igor
On 3/12/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i think that's correct. but i also heard that it will be publicly visible
later.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> is it at all feasible that it is being used for an internal system?
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 3/12/07, co
i think that's correct. but i also heard that it will be publicly visible
later.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> is it at all feasible that it is being used for an internal system?
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 3/12/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> If they use Wicket why doesn't it sho
look how wicket-examples are setup
-igor
On 3/12/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's news to me :) Thanks!
I tried reading more about it on the Wiki but I couldn't find an
example that maps the root. The example in
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-13.html maps
That's news to me :) Thanks!
I tried reading more about it on the Wiki but I couldn't find an
example that maps the root. The example in
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-13.html maps the application to
"/app". Do you have another example or documentation somewhere?
Gili
Ig
it is ok to do that (use /* mapping) if you use WicketFilter instead of
WicketServlet
-igor
On 3/12/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Brian,
Yes you can probably do that for a Wicket site with no external
references (i.e. static files hosted outside the scope of the servlet
su
Hi Brian,
Yes you can probably do that for a Wicket site with no external
references (i.e. static files hosted outside the scope of the servlet
such as images) but last time I checked the Wicket developers were
recommending against such a configuration.
Gili
Brian Topping wrote:
> Gili,
Gili,
I think I did this on http://www.autoscraper.com...
Brian
On Mar 12, 2007, at 5:30 PM, cowwoc wrote:
>
> My point is that you can't do that with Wicket, unless you know
> something I don't...?
>
> Gili
>
> Ryan wrote:
>> In any public application I deploy I remove the servlet contex
My point is that you can't do that with Wicket, unless you know
something I don't...?
Gili
Ryan wrote:
> In any public application I deploy I remove the servlet context path
> (wicket or no wicket).
>
> Ryan
>
> On 3/12/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If they use Wicke
the cons of this have already been discussed in this thread. see the
"onWire" messages.
-igor
On 3/12/07, Rüdiger Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hm, that looks good!
What would any of the Wicket developers say to that approach? Is there
some hidden catch waiting to happen, or this ok?
I'
Hm, that looks good!
What would any of the Wicket developers say to that approach? Is there
some hidden catch waiting to happen, or this ok?
I'm not sure if a behaviour like that should end up in Wicket core (e.g.
a method Component#onFirstAttach()), but I think I'll use that in some
of my compon
why dont you just port wicket to perl!
-igor
On 3/12/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/12/07, smallufo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> will the wicket package name change in the future ?
> eg: org.apache.wicket.* ...
This depends on the future of our current trunk. When
On 3/12/07, smallufo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> will the wicket package name change in the future ?
> eg: org.apache.wicket.* ...
This depends on the future of our current trunk. When we vote to
discontinue the current Wicket 2.0 effort, we have to take another
look at the wicket package na
On 3/12/07, Iman Rahmatizadeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really ? Wicket will directly be a top level apache project ? I thought it
> would take some time ...
When we graduate, it will be top level. But that is the hurdle we have
to take. And after that it will take a few weeks to migrate the
in
not for 1.3
-igor
On 3/12/07, smallufo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
will the wicket package name change in the future ?
eg: org.apache.wicket.* ...
2007/3/12, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >:
>
> On 3/12/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > Having played with the nabble
Hi
will the wicket package name change in the future ?
eg: org.apache.wicket.* ...
2007/3/12, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 3/12/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having played with the nabble search engine I can already tell that it
> rocks ! :)
Yeah, it is pretty dec
Great :) (didn't get back to my mail until now)
On 3/12/07, GS-ikiini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i got it. Thank you.
-B
James McLaughlin-3 wrote:
>
> While wicket automatically injects all components (provided you have
setup
> the proper componentinstantiationlistener), you need to inject
Really ? Wicket will directly be a top level apache project ? I thought it
would take some time ...
On 3/12/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/12/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having played with the nabble search engine I can already tell that it
> rocks ! :)
i got it. Thank you.
-B
James McLaughlin-3 wrote:
>
> While wicket automatically injects all components (provided you have setup
> the proper componentinstantiationlistener), you need to inject your own
> stuff with InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(obj)
>
> best,
> jim
>
> On 3/12/07, GS
Hey guys,
I am trying to automatically close a modal window if an exception occurs
within its ajax requests or submits.
For example, if I press a button in a modal, and that ajax request
causes an exception, I'd like to close the modal before allowing wicket
to handle the runtime exception.
Thanks a lot for all this information.
I'm looking forward of Wicket as a top level Apache project. It'll
give the framework attention it deserves (IMHO).
Keep on the good job !
++
ZedroS
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influenc
* Thomas R. Corbin:
> or do you need to have each tab have it's own form?
>
> And if each tab has it's own form, does the user need to save
> their data before switching tabs?
>
> Would the submit button be on each form, on each tab, or outside
> the tabs entirely?
If all the tab's contents a
In any public application I deploy I remove the servlet context path
(wicket or no wicket).
Ryan
On 3/12/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If they use Wicket why doesn't it show at all on their website at
> joost.com? I am expecting to at least see some evidence of a servlet
> con
Me again :). I update the page http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
display/WICKET/Creating+a+FormComponentAjaxBehavior but a cannot
attach any image (.jpg) and the quickstart project (.tar.gz), I don't
know if is a permission problem or what. Anyone can help me?
On 05-03-2007, at 16:03, Igor
oh the componetInstantiationListener was set in the Applicaition class.
-B
James McLaughlin-3 wrote:
>
> While wicket automatically injects all components (provided you have setup
> the proper componentinstantiationlistener), you need to inject your own
> stuff with InjectorHolder.getInjector
how do i do this? can you please give me an example. below is what i did.
maybe you can point out what i need to do.
in the myProjectApplication{
public myProjectApplication() {
super();
}
@Override
protected void init() {
// Spring injector
addComponentInstantiationListener(n
While wicket automatically injects all components (provided you have setup
the proper componentinstantiationlistener), you need to inject your own
stuff with InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(obj)
best,
jim
On 3/12/07, GS-ikiini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all,
I am trying to use a spri
Hey all,
I am trying to use a spring bean in my implementaion of IDataProvider. but
its just not working. i get a nullpointerexception. It however works fine in
my page classes. Can someone please help me with this problem. I would
really appreciate some help here. This is sending me mad at the m
is it at all feasible that it is being used for an internal system?
-igor
On 3/12/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If they use Wicket why doesn't it show at all on their website at
joost.com? I am expecting to at least see some evidence of a servlet
context path...
Gili
Brian
If they use Wicket why doesn't it show at all on their website at
joost.com? I am expecting to at least see some evidence of a servlet
context path...
Gili
Brian Topping wrote:
> Here I thought they were cool, then they use Ant?!?
>
> :b
>
> On Mar 12, 2007, at 8:45 AM, mraible wrote:
Hello,
ok, I think I understand what you're trying to do. You want to code a
bookmarkable link which links to the current page, but with an
additional parameter.
I think getRequest().getRequestParameters().getParameters() should
always return the same, no matter if the page was mounted or not. So
no we do not. someone needs to write a script to montor -javadoc.jar files
and extract them i suppose
-igor
On 3/12/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, I improved the documentation accordingly. I don't know if
this is published anywhere in real time however. Wicket t
OK, I improved the documentation accordingly. I don't know if
this is published anywhere in real time however. Wicket team? Do
you have a magic URL on wicketstuff.org for API documentation?
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
-
Here I thought they were cool, then they use Ant?!?
:b
On Mar 12, 2007, at 8:45 AM, mraible wrote:
>
> Thought y'all might be interested:
>
> http://opensource.joost.com/
>
> Joost is a new company started by the founders of Skype:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joost
>
> Matt
> --
> View th
thank you much
-igor
On 3/12/07, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have created an enhancment request for Wicket 2 as
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-380
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Fut
if you need to extend it to configure it then it should be made abstract
-igor
On 3/12/07, Matt Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/12/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, you may be missing something. You should have written at
> least 5 lines of Java code to
I have created an enhancment request for Wicket 2 as
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-380
<>-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to sha
On 3/12/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, you may be missing something. You should have written at
least 5 lines of Java code to activate the reloading of your own
classes. Did you extend ReloadingWicketFilter to include your own
packages? You need to specify your
* Matt Welch:
> >Your feedback on the reloading feature will be appreciated.
>
> Hmmm, I may be missing a configuration step or perhaps my
> expectations were off, but this doesn't appear to be working for
> me. I changed my web.xml to use the ReloadingWicketFilter and
> then ran my app
Your feedback on the reloading feature will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Hmmm, I may be missing a configuration step or perhaps my expectations were
off, but this doesn't appear to be working for me. I change
Thought y'all might be interested:
http://opensource.joost.com/
Joost is a new company started by the founders of Skype:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joost
Matt
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Joost-uses-Wicket-tf3390296.html#a9437082
Sent from the Wicket - User mailin
yes i know its trivial. and if you open a jira request i will also know what
version you need this for. and if it is for 1.2.x then it would be in the
changelog which is important for that version.
-igor
On 3/12/07, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Igor,
should I send you a pro
That's exactly the problem. Thanks.
Joel
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/9/2007 4:39 PM >>>
make sure your servlet mapping ends with /* and not just /
-igor
On 3/9/07, Joel Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I cannot seem to get mountBookmarkablePage() to work. Any time I try
an
> access a page thr
2007/3/12, Rüdiger Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
you could pass the whole map to your components.
Hello , this is what I want to avoid.
I have a compoment : 'LanguageBar' , which 'appends' language=Chinese or
language=English or...whatever to current ParameterMap is.
So I wrote this :
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> You could try this:
>
> pw1 = new PasswordTextField("password", new PropertyModel(user, "password"));
> pw2 = new PasswordTextField("confirm", new Model(""));
> form.add(pw1);
> form.add(pw2);
> form.add(new EqualPasswordInputValidator(pw1, pw2));
ok, in the specific cas
Hello,
you could pass the whole map to your components.
But I'd code the components in a way that they don't care where their
state is coming from. So you could pass all relevant parameters to the
corresponding component constructor, or use some kind of IModel
implementation.
An example of what
On 3/12/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having played with the nabble search engine I can already tell that it
> rocks ! :)
Yeah, it is pretty decent.
> And the new Wicket website is really nice ! :)
Thanks
> When will it be the "official" new wicket website ?
When we graduate.
Having played with the nabble search engine I can already tell that it
rocks ! :)
And the new Wicket website is really nice ! :)
When will it be the "official" new wicket website ?
Cheers,
ZedroS
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash.
2007/3/12, Rüdiger Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Use the constructor WebPage(wicket.PageParameters). There you get all
parameters as a map, no matter if the page was mounted or not.
Thank you
But compoments seem still cannot direct get parameterMap from
getRequest().getRequestParameters().getPa
Yes, looking at what Rüdiger told I've found this way of doing as well
and was going for it :)
Thanks a lot
++
ZedroS
On 3/12/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could try this:
>
> pw1 = new PasswordTextField("password", new PropertyModel(user, "password"));
> pw2 = new Passwor
You could try this:
pw1 = new PasswordTextField("password", new PropertyModel(user, "password"));
pw2 = new PasswordTextField("confirm", new Model(""));
form.add(pw1);
form.add(pw2);
form.add(new EqualPasswordInputValidator(pw1, pw2));
Martijn
On 3/12/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Nah,
Our website will migrate to apache, shortly, and the information there
is much better:
http://incubator.apache.org/wicket/community.html
Martijn
On 3/12/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should I open a JIRA issue to have the archive links in the wicket
> home page updated ?
Hello,
you could store the confirm password as page property, and provide an
matching model just for the PasswordTextField.
ZedroS Schwart schrieb:
> Hi
>
> In my register page, I have a PasswordTextField for the confirmation password.
>
> For sure, this field isn't stored in my model, and thus
Use the constructor WebPage(wicket.PageParameters). There you get all
parameters as a map, no matter if the page was mounted or not.
Rüdiger
smallufo schrieb:
> Before using mountBookmarkablePage() , parameters are presented as
> ?var1=a&var2=b ...
> I can get a map of parameters by
> getRequest
Should I open a JIRA issue to have the archive links in the wicket
home page updated ?
++
ZedroS
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share yo
Hi
In my register page, I have a PasswordTextField for the confirmation password.
For sure, this field isn't stored in my model, and thus I've a
mismatch between it and my model object.
For sure, I could inherit my User object and then add this
confirmPassword field in it and then, onSubmit, cre
Use nabble:
nabble.com/Wicket-f13974.html
Martijn
On 3/12/07, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I was willing to do a search in the user mailing list archive, as I
> used to do in the past.
>
> I went from Wicket home page to "mailing lists" and then to "Archive"
> on Source
Hi all
I was willing to do a search in the user mailing list archive, as I
used to do in the past.
I went from Wicket home page to "mailing lists" and then to "Archive"
on SourceForge. However, arriving on SourceForge I got an error.
Digging deeper, I finally found there
(http://sourceforge.net/
Before using mountBookmarkablePage() , parameters are presented as
?var1=a&var2=b ...
I can get a map of parameters by
getRequest().getRequestParameters().getParameters();
After using mountBookmarkablePage() , parameters are translated to
spider-friendly style : /var1/a/var2/b
and getRequest().ge
Still playing around with this, and I have a question.
When does the IModel's setObject() method get called?
I'm stepping through the code, but this method is never being called...
Cheers,
Dave
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 16:47 -0600, Thomas R. Corbin wrote:
> On Friday, 09 March 2007 11:57 am,
* Kent Tong:
> Jean-Baptiste Quenot apache.org> writes:
>
> > That's right, with this new feature you don't need to restart
> > your webapp in most cases.
>
> Will it invalidate the session?
No. In most cases you need to go back to a bookmarkable page or
home page to avoid page expired error
Dear Igor,
should I send you a propsal (a modified class as source)? The Modificatoin is
very trivial.
Stefan Lindner
<>-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll
77 matches
Mail list logo
