:-)
if you disable a formcomponent then neither a set or get will be
called
Yes. But it's not disabled, and get is being called. Just not set.
I must be doing something wrong or missing something in the impl here...
but I don't see what it is. :-(
Cheers,
Dave
Sorry for
Hi all
On 3/13/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it is ok to do that (use /* mapping) if you use WicketFilter instead of
WicketServlet
I'm sorry but I didn't a WicketFilter class in the API nor in the
wicket examples. And the web.xml file from wicket examples seems
rather normal to me
Hello,
the Filter is not in Wicket 1.2.x, only 1.3 and 2.0.
ZedroS Schwart schrieb:
Hi all
On 3/13/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it is ok to do that (use /* mapping) if you use WicketFilter instead of
WicketServlet
I'm sorry but I didn't a WicketFilter class in the API nor
Danke schön Rüdiger !
I understand better now.
Have a good day
++
ZedroS
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT
I built wicket 2.0 from current trunk and my application that worked well with
last week#s wicket trunk no lnger works at all. No AJAX functionality at all.
AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior, AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior no longer
work. The AJAX debug window shows no activity at all. Any
The problem is that without some idea of the context, 'big' doesn't
mean anything - Are we talking about something like Amazon, Google,
MSN or Yahoo, for instance? I doubt Wicket would be a good match for
that sort of big, but for lesser values of big, then it's probably
as suitable as any other
Considering that the hierarchy is specified in the template, isn't there
some way to use this to construct the hierarchy automatically?
Robert
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's
No that is not possible.
Consider:
span wicket:id=foospan wicket:id=bar/span/span
span wicket:id=barspan wicket:id=bar/span/span
add(new WebMarkupContainer(foo).add(new Label(bar, bar)));
add(new WebMarkupContainer(bar).add(new Label(bar, bar)));
How could Wicket automatically know where to
On 3/12/07, Brian Topping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here I thought they were cool, then they use Ant?!?
Yes, with Ivy. Maybe not cool, but works very well :-)
- Xavier
:b
On Mar 12, 2007, at 8:45 AM, mraible wrote:
Thought y'all might be interested:
http://opensource.joost.com/
Hi,
I get this error message when trying to build wicket:
ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
error: error reading /Users/john/.m2/repository/org/apache/wicket/
Probably you have remove the jars from your local repository and build again.
Martijn
On 3/13/07, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I get this error message when trying to build wicket:
ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
I get the same error and have tried to remove local jar files. I'll look
into it tonight (can't get workspace setup using new al structure)
Frank
P.s. Ubuntu linux
On 3/13/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably you have remove the jars from your local repository and build
I removed all wicket jars from my maven repo and also from the target
folders of the source folders. The file wicket-1.3.0-incubating-
SNAPSHOT.jar was recreated but a similar error was shown:
Loading source file /Users/John/Development/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.4/wicket-
Hi all,
I have the following spring configuration in my web.xml:
context-param
param-namecontextConfigLocation/param-name
param-valueclasspath*:applicationContext-service.xml/param-value
/context-param
The applicationContext-service.xml references a hibernate-cfg.xml file.
Ok, again I solved my own problem.
I inserted a classpath:hibernate-cfg.xml and it now works in the
applicationContext.xml file.
Regards
On 3/13/07, Udora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have the following spring configuration in my web.xml:
context-param
Thomas R. Corbin wrote:
or do you need to have each tab have it's own form?
And if each tab has it's own form, does the user need to save their data
before switching tabs?
Would the submit button be on each form, on each tab, or outside the tabs
entirely?
You can do this however you
On 13 Mar 2007, at 12:31, Frank Bille wrote:
I get the same error and have tried to remove local jar files. I'll
look into it tonight (can't get workspace setup using new al
structure)
Great, cheers. Until then I have checked out the last revision
before the restructuring.
I just did a clean checkout of our 1.x branch, removed my local
repository, and it 'just worked'.
I do use maven 2.0.5, perhaps that is the deciding factor?
Martijn
On 3/13/07, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13 Mar 2007, at 12:31, Frank Bille wrote:
I get the same error and have
Hi
* serialVersionUID and anonymous inner classes
Quite often in my code, I've got some warning due to non define
serialVersionUID.
I usually tell Eclipse to generate them for me.
However, for the anonymous inner classes, which are quite commun, I'm
not sure it's ok. Is it ?
Furthermore, I'm
2.0.5, you say... hmm, I'll try later
Frank
On 3/13/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did a clean checkout of our 1.x branch, removed my local
repository, and it 'just worked'.
I do use maven 2.0.5, perhaps that is the deciding factor?
Martijn
On 3/13/07, John Patterson
Strange, I just deleted the entire .m2/repository/org/apache/wicket/
directory and checked out a fresh copy of http://svn.apache.org/repos/
asf/incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x into a new directory,
updated mvn to 2.0.5 (using darwin ports) and ran:
mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true install
Does no one have an answer to this question?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Apaar
Trivedi
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 4:50 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Wicket-user] onFailure AjaxCallDecorators and
Also: when I think about 'big' projects, I think about projects that
run for long time, have complex requirements and have a medium to
large sized team working collaborating on it. For such projects Wicket
is an excellent match due to reusability, separation of concerns, etc.
Eelco
On 3/13/07,
Can I have the opinions of all committers please? Johan is on a skiing
trip but opts for c).
Eelco
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
I'm not a committer, but I opt for c.
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 09:38 -0700, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Can I have the opinions of all committers please? Johan is on a skiing
trip but opts for c).
Eelco
-
Take Surveys. Earn
i would opt for (b) but seems im in a minority :)
-igor
On 3/13/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I have the opinions of all committers please? Johan is on a skiing
trip but opts for c).
Eelco
-
Take
I go with crowd, C.
On 3/13/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i would opt for (b) but seems im in a minority :)
-igor
On 3/13/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I have the opinions of all committers please? Johan is on a skiing
trip but opts for c).
Eelco
I just checked out the core 2.0 projects and they work fine for me.
Also, as there haven't been any changes for 2.0 the last few weeks, I
can't imagine out broke out of the blue.
Could you check your installation Stefan?
Eelco
On 3/13/07, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I built
On Monday, 12 March 2007 04:37 pm, Jean-Baptiste Quenot escreveu:
* Thomas R. Corbin:
or do you need to have each tab have it's own form?
And if each tab has it's own form, does the user need to save
their data before switching tabs?
Would the submit button be on each form, on each
if elements are not visible they are not validated
so what you have to do is not allow the user to switch between tabs unless
everything on that tab has validated. you can do this by overriding the
linkfactory on the tabbed panel, using a submitlink, and only calling
setactivetab on the panel if
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Can I have the opinions of all committers please? Johan is on a skiing
trip but opts for c).
I don't want to do any of A, B or C.
What I /really/ think we should try to achieve:
1. Have long-term JDK 1.4 and JDK 1.5 branches that are easy to
sync/backport from.
On Tuesday, 13 March 2007 07:54 am, Al Maw escreveu:
Thomas R. Corbin wrote:
or do you need to have each tab have it's own form?
And if each tab has it's own form, does the user need to save their data
before switching tabs?
Would the submit button be on each form, on each tab, or
But, what if 'big' means Ebay, yahoo, etc?
If they came to you saying they wanted to build major public facing
portions of their site in Wicket, would you warn them away?
Upayavira
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Also: when I think about 'big' projects, I think about projects that
run for long time,
I wouldn't, but sites on that scale would require you to do some
serious planning for scalability - whatever the technology you use.
There are many ways to scale up and out, but Wicket's reliance on
server side memory limits the options somewhat. There are stateless
pages, forms and links nowadays
I wouldn't == no I would not warn them away. :)
On 3/13/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't, but sites on that scale would require you to do some
serious planning for scalability - whatever the technology you use.
There are many ways to scale up and out, but Wicket's
* Igor Vaynberg:
a better option for these situations imho is to not to use a
serverside tabpanel, but a clientside one. that way your
entire form is written out and the submit button submits
the entire thing. a js lib like this makes it trivial:
Who is going to attend Apache Con in Amsterdam? We are planning to
host an evening session, but we would like to know how many would be
interested/attend.
You can see the schedule here:
http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/BirdsOfaFeatherEu07
Other presentations featuring Wicket:
- A tutorial on
I'll be there!
Also, even if you are not going to Apache Con but happen to be near
Amsterdam in that week, let us know so maybe we can do some informal
hookup in a cafe or something.
Maybe we could start a WIKI page about it?
Eelco
On 3/13/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who is
Warn them away? No. I think it really comes down to doing a realistic
scaling test to estimate hardware resource usage and then using that to
estimate fixed and variable costs over the life of the project. Wicket has
costs, but I think people tend to underestimate the cost of creating and
I have upgraded to 2.0.5 and also updated to latest svn version of 1.3, and
I now get a different error:
http://www.nabble.com/Al%27s-repository-restructure-tf3386729.html#a9469179
Frank
On 3/13/07, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange, I just deleted the entire
I'm using wicket and trying to work out how to set up my directories so
that while editing HTML markups my HTML editor has access to the same
CSS files that will be used as run time.
The HTML markups are in my project/src/com/sas/ui/wicket directory with
my wicket component classes but being in
41 matches
Mail list logo
