* Eelco Hillenius:
Sounds good to me. But rather than starting with a list of all project
that are in wicket-stuff now, maybe we should make a list here of the
projects people are willing to support (and thus write a piece about
in this new site).
I'd be happy to write a short intro about:
On 1/20/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand the whole issue: the idea is to move
wicket-stuff outside of Sourceforge? Why is the provided URL just
an ip address?
No, just the website and issue management. sf.net doesn't support
confluence as a wiki (it is java
* Martijn Dashorst:
Hosting the important stuff ourselves is beneficial to the
projects: JIRA is much better than the sf.net tracker,
confluence ditto.
Big +1, good initiative.
The IP address is because we're still debating what to do with the
wicketframework.org domain
And what about wicketstuff.org then? We could register it right
now and point it to the afore-mentioned IP address.
done. will take a week or so to process
Martijn
--
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download
On 1/20/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/20/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand the whole issue: the idea is to move
wicket-stuff outside of Sourceforge? Why is the provided URL just
an ip address?
Yeah, I ported quite all the contents of
* Filippo Diotalevi:
On 1/20/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/20/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand the whole issue: the idea is to move
wicket-stuff outside of Sourceforge? Why is the provided
URL just an ip address?
Vaynberg
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:04
An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar
forwicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
i will try to get it setup today.
-igor
On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm with Fillipo
Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar
forwicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
i will try to get it setup today.
-igor
On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm with Fillipo. We've already determined that we can't host wicket-stuff
with wicket on apache.org
?
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von Igor Vaynberg
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:04
An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar
forwicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
i will try to get it setup today
@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar
forwicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
i will try to get it setup today.
-igor
On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm with Fillipo. We've already determined that we can't host
wicket
von Igor Vaynberg
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:04
An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar
forwicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
i will try to get it setup today.
-igor
On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin
?
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von Igor Vaynberg
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:04
An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar
forwicket-contrib
Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar
forwicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
i will try to get it setup today.
-igor
On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm with Fillipo. We've already determined that we can't host
?
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von Igor Vaynberg
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:04
An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar
forwicket-contrib-scriptaculous
On 1/11/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://81.17.46.170:8090/confluence
sign up for an account and i will grant you permissions
Great Job igor!
I've just signed up with the account 'fdiotalevi'
--
Filippo Diotalevi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog
On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, on second thought, there is hardly anything in the sf issue tracker
for wicket-stuff, so there wouldn't be any migration issues. I didn't
realize Jira could be part of the package. If others agree, and it wouldn't
be to difficult for
I just signed up as well (wireframe).
should we create a separate space for each wicket-stuff project? I think
that confluence works the best using spaces instead of child pages to
segregate info.
On 1/11/07, Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL
you, jim, and korbinian are now admins for the wicket-stuff spaces
-igor
On 1/11/07, Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/11/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://81.17.46.170:8090/confluence
sign up for an account and i will grant you permissions
Great Job igor!
?
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von Igor Vaynberg
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:04
An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar
forwicket-contrib
Could you make me an admin as well? Thanks,
Eelco
On 1/11/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you, jim, and korbinian are now admins for the wicket-stuff spaces
-igor
On 1/11/07, Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/11/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i already have, while i was setting up the other three :)
-igor
On 1/11/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you make me an admin as well? Thanks,
Eelco
On 1/11/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you, jim, and korbinian are now admins for the wicket-stuff spaces
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I just signed up as cheeser. How do I go about creating a space for the
JR stuff? Do I need to be an admin for that or can any user do that?
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
i already have, while i was setting up the other three :)
-igor
On
Thanks,
Eelco
On 1/11/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i already have, while i was setting up the other three :)
-igor
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel
+1 for space per project
I'll take the scripaculous project documentation lead.
On 1/11/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you guys need to first decide how you want to organize confluence. space
per project? one wiki, one website? who has admin to what?
after a consensus has been
On 1/11/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you guys need to first decide how you want to organize confluence. space per
project? one wiki, one website? who has admin to what?
A workspace per project seems a bit overkill to me, since for every
workspaces we should create design,
On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm with Filippo.
+1 for one wiki, one web site. Let's keep it real simple off the bat and not
create any administrative headaches. Most projects have only one maintainer,
and there are no separate mailing lists. We should be able to evolve
26 matches
Mail list logo
