I can't speak for the wicket committers, but in my opinion users should
be encouraged to write down as much as possible in the wiki, even if the
quality is not perfect. Other people can (and will, in my experience)
improve it and remove redundant or false information.
Exactly :)
Eelco
---
Eelco Hillenius schrieb:
Yeah, especially the component reference should be helpfull. We all
put a lot of effort in that! :)
Yes, I always look into the example project first to see how a component
should be used. It's very helpful.
Replacing these examples with tutorials in the wiki would b
Vincent Jenks schrieb:
It's very useful, however, it's also lacking quite a bit of
information. The Wiki and the Javadoc doesn't get you as far as you'd
hope, as a newbie.
That's bad.
I think that Javadocs are perfect as a reference. In combination with
various tutorials to get started, that'
Yeah, especially the component reference should be helpfull. We all
put a lot of effort in that! :)
Eelco
On 5/1/06, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One thing that often gets overlooked is the wicket-examples
module/project, which is either available as a download
(http://sourceforge.net/
One thing that often gets overlooked is the wicket-examples
module/project, which is either available as a download
(http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=119783&package_id=138752)
or live at http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/, although
the live is based on the last maj
I have to agree. What would be nice, if possible, is a small example
code snippet in the Javadoc for each object. However, some may feel
that code doesn't belong in there at all and should be in the wiki
instead.
Personally, I like example code too but small examples don't always
fully illustra
Due to the lack of time most of us have here, we need to make choices.
I think the WIKI is great for getting the contributions from the
community itself, though the core devs - especially Gwyn - regularly
update it too. But it's really great to see more people are helping
out and writing items on
It's very useful, however, it's also lacking quite a bit of
information. The Wiki and the Javadoc doesn't get you as far as you'd
hope, as a newbie.
I use the Wiki, search the mailing list, and then post when I run out
of options for info.
Anyhow, everything is improving daily...including the w
Vincent Jenks schrieb:
Yes, the developers are *insanely* helpful and patient. ;) Without
this list I'm not sure I would have been able to use Wicket for long,
to be perfectly honest.
"Try the Wiki!" wasn't ment as "Try the Wiki because the devs have
better things to do", it was ment as "Try
Yes, the developers are *insanely* helpful and patient. ;) Without
this list I'm not sure I would have been able to use Wicket for long,
to be perfectly honest.
On 5/1/06, Timo Stamm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rivka Shisman schrieb:
> A good book with examples and recipes is quite necessary :-)
Rivka Shisman schrieb:
A good book with examples and recipes is quite necessary :-)
Try the Wiki! http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk
There is nice guide for beginners that should get you started:
http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Newuserguide
Then there is the reference library with inf
Yeah, Martijn and me are working on Wicket In Action (Manning). It'll
be a few months; it's a lot of work and I found that you really have
to have inspiration days for writing.
Anyway, working on it. Until then, please use this list, the IRC
channel, the WIKI and whatever other means we have for
Afaik two of the main developers are currently working on a Wicket in
Action book. I don't know anything about schedules, but I guess they
were quite busy lately to push the 1.2 out the door.
hth,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 5/1/06, Rivka Shisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all
Hello all,
Is there a book on Wicket? If not – is there a plan for such
a book?
A good book with examples and recipes is quite necessary J
Thanks
Rivka
Or is Wicket considered to be so simple that there isn't a need?
Exactly! :)johan
And you can always look on the wiki, and on my blog (there are some chapters from the reference guide there).
Also, don't miss the component reference in the wicket-examples project
(see them here: http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/compref)
MartijnOn 12/20/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL
Yep. Martijn and I are working on Wicket In Action. And as a spin off,
we'd like to improve our normal documentation a bit too.
Eelco
On 12/20/05, Christopher Dodunski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a new comer, I was wondering if there was an existing text on Wicket,
> or one in the pi
Hi,
As a new comer, I was wondering if there was an existing text on Wicket,
or one in the pipeline - "Wicket In Action" maybe? Or is Wicket
considered to be so simple that there isn't a need?
Cheers,
Christopher.
---
This SF.net email is s
18 matches
Mail list logo
