Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-bench and the html editor

2007-01-28 Thread Loren Rosen
I use the WTP html editor. Joni Freeman wrote: On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 18:17 -0800, Loren Rosen wrote: Yes, I can create a patch. It's a one-line change (well, two lines if you count changing the class imports). (The code in question assumes the editor is a CompilationUnitEditor when in

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-bench and the html editor

2007-01-27 Thread Joni Freeman
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 18:17 -0800, Loren Rosen wrote: Yes, I can create a patch. It's a one-line change (well, two lines if you count changing the class imports). (The code in question assumes the editor is a CompilationUnitEditor when in fact it suffices to assume an AbstractTextEditor.

[Wicket-user] wicket-bench and the html editor

2007-01-25 Thread Loren Rosen
I've got a wicket-bench question which I'll ask here since the wicket-bench mailing list seems moribund. If you don't set a default html editor, what should happen in the html tab of a wicket-bench editor window? What I get is what appears to be a bastardized java editor which behaves

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-bench and the html editor

2007-01-25 Thread Igor Vaynberg
On 1/25/07, Loren Rosen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now the installation instructions say to set an explicit default html editor in the eclipse preferences. However I found at least one place in the wicket-bench code that directly assumes that the java editor is used for editing html files. I

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-bench and the html editor

2007-01-25 Thread Loren Rosen
Yes, I can create a patch. It's a one-line change (well, two lines if you count changing the class imports). (The code in question assumes the editor is a CompilationUnitEditor when in fact it suffices to assume an AbstractTextEditor. My guess is it was copied from some Eclipse documentation