+1
Eelco
Johan Compagner wrote:
We now have:
public AbstractChoice(final String id, IModel model, final List
choices, final IChoiceRenderer renderer)
I want to change it to:
public AbstractChoice(final String id, IModel model, final IModel
choices, final IChoiceRenderer renderer)
So
+1
Juergen
On 7/29/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Eelco
Johan Compagner wrote:
We now have:
public AbstractChoice(final String id, IModel model, final List
choices, final IChoiceRenderer renderer)
I want to change it to:
public AbstractChoice(final
+/- 0 (+1)
I like the option discussed in the wicket 1.1b2-rc1 string.
keep both and make the old one deprecated.
But if you can't have both, then break
Johan Compagner wrote:
We now have:
public AbstractChoice(final String id, IModel model, final List
choices, final IChoiceRenderer
+1 the javadoc should be clear that the underlying model object needs to be
a list or whatever. It would be nice to switch to imodelt right now.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Johan Compagner
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 4:33 AM
that is not an option (using generics)
i think this will be an option After 1.2 not earlier because wicket is a
framework that will be used on servers
and servers are pretty slow to adapt to new java versions.
Especially things like Websphere where versions are build on a specific jvm
I will
