Re: [Wicket-user] Setter for ListMultipleChoice not called

2006-04-21 Thread Dave Schoorl
I created a bugreport for it with id 1474136 (http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1474136&group_id=119783&atid=684975). Regards, Dave Johan Compagner wrote: hmm that is not as easy is i thought it would be. Can you make a bug report for this? CheckGroup is also such

Re: [Wicket-user] Setter for ListMultipleChoice not called

2006-04-21 Thread Johan Compagner
hmm that is not as easy is i thought it would be.Can you make a bug report for this?CheckGroup is also such a component that doesn't set the collection back.johan On 4/21/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ahh now i rember what the problem was.ModelChanging/ModelChanged is called 2 time

Re: [Wicket-user] Setter for ListMultipleChoice not called

2006-04-21 Thread Johan Compagner
ahh now i rember what the problem was.ModelChanging/ModelChanged is called 2 times thenthis we do now:    modelChanging();            selectedValues.clear();            selectedValues.addAll ((Collection)getConvertedInput());            modelChanged();i can't call setModelObject(selectedVal

Re: [Wicket-user] Setter for ListMultipleChoice not called

2006-04-21 Thread Johan Compagner
i could just get the collection/clear it/fill it and then set it back with the same instance.i guess that is fine.johanOn 4/21/06, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Johan, that did the trick. However, that behaviour did changesince snapshot 20060302.More on a philosophic note though, for all

Re: [Wicket-user] Setter for ListMultipleChoice not called

2006-04-21 Thread Dave
Thanks Johan, that did the trick. However, that behaviour did change since snapshot 20060302. More on a philosophic note though, for all components I have used sofar, when there is a Property-model backing those components, there are getters and setters called to set or retrieve values into th

Re: [Wicket-user] Setter for ListMultipleChoice not called

2006-04-20 Thread Johan Compagner
we don't set the values. We only do that when there is nothing returned in the getIf a collection is returned by the get that collection is filled with the values.But as far as i know we always did that, there is some code changed i think but we couldn't just set a List in it. Because who is tellin