Re: [Wicket-user] plain 'ol DropDownChoice of strings??

2007-01-11 Thread Matej Knopp
V. Jenks wrote: Sure, I'd be happy to comment on that. Some constructive criticism; there are many things that JSF does easier and/or better (IMO) than Wicket. 1. select lists are *much* easier to populate, manipulate, and deal with. ;) It is possible that our DropDownChoice looks a bit

Re: [Wicket-user] plain 'ol DropDownChoice of strings??

2007-01-11 Thread Eelco Hillenius
1. select lists are *much* easier to populate, manipulate, and deal with. ;) 2. paging and sorting tables/grids/lists are *much, much* easier to implement, something I wish would be made easier in Wicket. I'd do it myself if I had time...and tried in the past...but am just not skilled enough

Re: [Wicket-user] plain 'ol DropDownChoice of strings??

2007-01-11 Thread Scott Swank
1. select lists are *much* easier to populate, manipulate, and deal with. ;) Could you write some pseudo-code (or real code) that is simpler than the current implementation? I.e. what steps in the current implementation can be streamlined? 2. paging and sorting tables/grids/lists are *much,

Re: [Wicket-user] plain 'ol DropDownChoice of strings??

2007-01-11 Thread Eelco Hillenius
What about a StatelessPage (1.3 2.0) that had a Visitor that checked whether any of its components were not stateless? I think that should work by default now. So if all components on a page are stateless, the page will be recognized being stateless and thus not be put in the session. Correct

Re: [Wicket-user] plain 'ol DropDownChoice of strings??

2007-01-10 Thread Igor Vaynberg
first, you dont need to specify that IChoiceRenderer as it does what the default one does second, you are doing this: form.add(new DropDownChoice(phoneType, new Model(), that newModel() isnt bound to your entity, so use a constructor without that IModel param - that way the compound property

Re: [Wicket-user] plain 'ol DropDownChoice of strings??

2007-01-10 Thread Igor Vaynberg
offtopic, would like to hear about your jsf experience compared to wicket. anything you found better that we can improve? -igor On 1/10/07, V. Jenks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, been a long hiatus for me but I'm diving back into Wicket finally. I'm a little rusty (was forced, against

Re: [Wicket-user] plain 'ol DropDownChoice of strings??

2007-01-10 Thread V. Jenks
Sure, I'd be happy to comment on that. Some constructive criticism; there are many things that JSF does easier and/or better (IMO) than Wicket. 1. select lists are *much* easier to populate, manipulate, and deal with. ;) 2. paging and sorting tables/grids/lists are *much, much* easier to

Re: [Wicket-user] plain 'ol DropDownChoice of strings??

2007-01-10 Thread V. Jenks
One more thing :D Wicket has a fantastic group of developers and the support has been top-knotch...the same can't be said about every project. If this mailing list wasn't here I might not have used Wicket so much...or at all. igor.vaynberg wrote: offtopic, would like to hear about your jsf

Re: [Wicket-user] plain 'ol DropDownChoice of strings??

2007-01-10 Thread V. Jenks
That worked, thanks a lot. igor.vaynberg wrote: first, you dont need to specify that IChoiceRenderer as it does what the default one does second, you are doing this: form.add(new DropDownChoice(phoneType, new Model(), that newModel() isnt bound to your entity, so use a constructor

Re: [Wicket-user] plain 'ol DropDownChoice of strings??

2007-01-10 Thread Igor Vaynberg
cool, thanks for the comparison, a few points to discuss On 1/10/07, V. Jenks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. select lists are *much* easier to populate, manipulate, and deal with. ;) can i have an example of code? 2. paging and sorting tables/grids/lists are *much, much* easier to