The logical place here would be your Application/ WebApplication
object. You could combine this with init parameters in web-xml and
reading them in the Application.init method. Or, in case you want to
use Spring, use Spring config to configure your Application
properties.
Eelco
On 12/4/05,
Thank you for your reply.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
The logical place here would be your Application/ WebApplication
object.
I looked into that, but are these values accessible from every page?
- Johannes.
On 12/4/05, Johannes Fahrenkrug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a short
Yep. You can get the application from several places, like
Component.getApplication (and note that Pages are Components too) or
as a falltrhough, when in a request, you can always call
Application.get() (slightly less efficient though, as that is done by
threadlocal map lookup). And you have to
ok first pass is in. filter stuff is not all there and some of it is broken, but the major idea is there. the rest should be in pretty good shape though. its mostly backwards compatible so there should not be any problems. feedback?
-IgorOn 12/4/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Yep. You can get the application from several places, like
Component.getApplication (and note that Pages are Components too) or
as a falltrhough, when in a request, you can always call
Application.get() (slightly less efficient though, as that is done by
threadlocal map
I have filed one
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1373395group_id=119783atid=684975
Thanks
Dipu
- Original Message -
From: Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user]
Johan Compagner wrote:
What is high request volume? How many users are we talking about then?
Well, perhaps not too high, I think the target is about 20,000 users
using the site at any moment.
utku
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Question 3:
In our design, we want the customer to be able to lay the
components in a simple, stacked, sequential layout for the future, so
we actually have one Page/PageLayer, which gets the order of the
components and calls them accordingly. So I will probably be
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Actually, I don't think it is too bad to go for a one page thing. You
can get a long way by switching panels etc. And Ajax heavy pages
probably look more like that too. The only thing to consider is
whether you want some of your destinations to be bookmarkable.
Eelco
I think thats pretty pretty pretty high...!!how many request per second do you think will be generated then? Does every user click on one page ever 30 seconds?But with that kind of numbers you should really cluster.
And the best thing to do is run youre applicaton with one user, what a average
Please get back on IRC (your connection just timed out) and we will
discuss this quicker.
Gili
Johan Compagner wrote:
you always get a BufferedWebResponse by default. (See
ApplicationSettings.getBufferResponse())
What i don't get is how it is possible that the outputstream is already
Can someone please try reproduce this on their end? Please also update
wicket-examples dependency on wicket/wicket-extensions from 1.1 to SNAPSHOT.
Thanks,
Gili
--
http://www.desktopbeautifier.com/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
先生/小姐：
您好！很高兴认识您。我司有意与您们合作:可长久给您们带来巨大的效益,另因合作项目的高度自动化，
您们每天只需工作几分钟，对您们现有的工作没有影响！若有意，请电邮 给我,或请把您的联系电话/QQ告诉
我，以便更好地与您交流,进一步商谈合作事宜，谢谢！
深圳市好利通公司合作部 何素儿
网址：http://www.cnhlt.com
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QQ:363205469
电话：0755-88829928,81519553
yes, I know. Working on it.
Juergen
On 12/5/05, Gili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please try reproduce this on their end? Please also update
wicket-examples dependency on wicket/wicket-extensions from 1.1 to SNAPSHOT.
Thanks,
Gili
--
http://www.desktopbeautifier.com/
For Wicket developers, I think this is the best place to do so. I
don't mind the job listing, as long as it concerns Wicket. I don't see
a use for tapestry/struts/etc job offerings here :-)
Perhaps we should add a mailing list?
[EMAIL PROTECTED], or would that be stretching the
policy of the
Cool, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't overstepping any bounds. I've attached the official job posting that we have.--AndrewOn 12/5/05,
Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For Wicket developers, I think this is the best place to do so. Idon't mind the job listing, as long as it concerns
why have yet another mailing list people would have to subscribe to? we already have 3 user lists and one admin list although i bet not that many subscribed to our most recent announcements list. i think we have more then enough lists already. if it was up to me we wouldnt even have wicket-stuff
we already have 3 user lists and one admin list although i bet not that many
subscribed to our most recent announcements list.
announce has 34, wicket-user has 253 at this moment.
i think we have more then
enough lists already. if it was up to me we wouldnt even have wicket-stuff
lists as i
announce has 34, wicket-user has 253 at this moment.thats exactly my point :)
-Igor
Months ago, I had an impression that wicket dojo will support back button
to Ajax. I am very excited to have wicket-contrib-dojo-examples run week
ago. After several clicks on FX test pages, I clicked on back button (IE),
I notice that I left the test page completely. Bookmarking into those
-Original Message-
From: Karel Alfonso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2005 3:10 PM
To: 'wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: Problem finding HTML
Hi Wicket users. I'm very excited with Wicket, it's the framework I have
dreamed to build myself. Unfortunately
I think this is a problem with ajax and not with dojo support - although most people would argue that this is one of the bigger advantages of ajax. because the clicks do not change the browser's url the browser never records them in the history - and how could it.
-IgorOn 12/5/05, Eelco Hillenius
In fact, sites have been doing ajax long before ajax was called ajax.
And in fact the whole literal ajax, refering to using XML as the
messaging language and XmlHttpRequest object is bollucks, as there
seem to be more sites not using that than there are that do use it.
I am still not very
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2005/10/26/ajax-handling-bookmarks-and-back-button.html
On 12/5/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gmail is doing this by changing an src attr of a frame - which does generate
an entry a browser can keep track of. while other things are done via xmlrpc
Hi,
I've just checked out the new version. Thanks for the work. Here is my
feedback:
I think the 'FeatureModels' like ISortState should record the StateChanges
themself or at least create the Change objects themselfs.
Imagine I have a link 'clearSort'. Than in the onClick() I'd have to
Just for the record, Google's back button support SUCKs big time in
Safari. I have to kill my gmail session far too often to get excited
about Ajax and back button.
Martijn
On 12/6/05, Gili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI: Google's AJAX handles back button just fine so it must be
26 matches
Mail list logo
