Great, thank you so much!
You guys are awesome!!
Question: I read in another thread that work has begun on v2.0.
Can somebody tell me what the status of the 1.2 branch will be? Has
development on that branch essentially stopped now, except for bug
fixes?
Thanks!
Dave
On Tue, 2006-05-30
A document for the status and roadmap is being written... Lack of time
has put this roadmap on a slow lane... I'll try to get it out this
evening.
Martijn
On 5/31/06, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great, thank you so much!
You guys are awesome!!
Question: I read in another thread
Hi.
The problem is that you would need more constructors, and some wicket
components (DropDownChoice)... have already lot of constructors.
And the concept is currently limited to RepeatingView. As far as I know
there are no other components where you can use this, are they?
-Matej
Timo
Title: using fragments in a DefaultDataTable
I am trying to use fragments to decorate a column in a DefaultDataTable to either build an external link, or display text. I followed the Wicket QuickTour: Using Fragments example, although in a more complicated setting, and I keep getting a
bah, true procrastinators would of course procrastinate on any item in that list, so of course the list wouldnt work-IgorOn 5/31/06, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't take it that way It has been on my todo list for awhile... I guess I need to formalize my
On 5/30/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
The maven team has uploaded all our libraries of wicket 1.2 to their main
repository (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/wicket)
In case you are in Europe and you find repo1.maven.org very slow, use
my mirror that is located in the
are you using the constructor with markupProvider to construct the fragment? the markupprovider should point to the component in whose markup the fragment is defined. so if a fragment is defined in some panel's markup that panel instance is the markup provider.
-IgorOn 5/31/06, Renaut, Jonathan E
I've seen the bug and I don't yet what is wrong with it. But there are
virtually hundreds of WicketTester based junit tests in Wicket core
which work. May be you copy one of them and modify it to reproduce the
error?
Juergen
On 5/31/06, Michael Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would love to, but
When I reach with the selection in a combo box, to the first item in the
list, wicket places a Choose one option as the first item in the
combo. Am I doing something wrong or ... does anybody know how to avoid
this ?
---
All the advantages
If you call setNullValid(true) the default "null" value will be an empty string instead of "Choose One"
Andy
"When I reach with the selection in a combo box, to the first item in the list, wicket places a "Choose one" option as the first item in the combo. Am I doing something wrong or ...
Isn't your model object null? Try to set the model object to a different
value, it should help.
-Matej
Dorel Vaida wrote:
When I reach with the selection in a combo box, to the first item in the
list, wicket places a Choose one option as the first item in the
combo. Am I doing something
I you want to change the displayed string just put
youFormId.yourDropDownChoiceId.null=My null String
in your page's property file.
-Matej
Matej Knopp wrote:
Isn't your model object null? Try to set the model object to a different
value, it should help.
-Matej
Dorel Vaida wrote:
When I
add(new DropDownChoice(dropdown, model, values)
{
protected String getDefaultChoice(final Object selected)
{
return ; //this fixes your problem...
}
public String getDisplayValue(Object object)
{
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynberg at gmail.com writes:
are you using the constructor with markupProvider to construct the fragment?
the markupprovider should point to the component in whose markup the fragment is
defined. so if a fragment is defined in some panel's markup that panel instance
is
Hi,
I have a page with a DropDownChoice using the
wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications feature. This works very well. I
just tried out page mounting using app.mountBookmarkablePage, which
gives me an url like
How can I simply stop a page from rendering and redirect to another?
Say I've got a condition where I've found an object to be null or an
unacceptable value and I'd rather send the user to another page w/o
rendering the rest of the current page?
I thought I was doing that w/ setResponsePage()
new RestartResponseException(...) should do it.
-Matej
Vincent Jenks wrote:
How can I simply stop a page from rendering and redirect to another?
Say I've got a condition where I've found an object to be null or an
unacceptable value and I'd rather send the user to another page w/o
rendering
I really don't see why this problem can't be solved with the standard Open Session In View pattern. I've used it with Struts and Wicket without a problem.
Your dropdown doesn't sit inside a Form?Because that url is not really generated normally anymore for form componentsBecause the onSelectionChange is done as a semi submit of the form. and not through a url.
And what do you mean that if you mount a page you get that url? That doesn't look like a
Those long running Hibernate sessions are this pretty much long running transactions?For example if you load an object in such a session and 10 request lateryou still use that session. Do you still have that specific instance?
What does happen then if that object was already changed by somebody
Yes, I've done this w/ Hibernate w/o a problem, it works great when
you're manually creating destroying the sessions...but I'm not since
I'm using container managed sessions in EJB3.
How would this be done since the container controls the session for
me? Which, is what I wantI don't want
I've got a page where I need to call data from the EntityManger (EJB3)
several times in a single pagewhich means I'd need to have several
detached-models in the page.
Once I put these objects and/or collections of objects into a
detachable model, what's the best way to cast them back out to
in the end.. What seam does is just code.. So just take those parts..johanOn 5/31/06, Vincent Jenks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Yes, I've done this w/ Hibernate w/o a problem, it works great when
you're manually creating destroying the sessions...but I'm not sinceI'm using container managed sessions
I don't know why but I just don't like the idea of long-running
transactions. I think web applications are just too unpredictable to
hold one transaction during multiple request. You can never be sure when
(and if) the next request will come.
OpenSessionInView filter has always be sufficient
I'm not sure I understand you but you load the collections separately?
Can't you just do something like this?
class MyPage extends Page {
public MyPage() {
IModel m1 = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
Object load() {
return [load collection 1];
}
}
add(new
Easy enough to say, however, I don't know *how* Seam does what it does
- I have no idea how to implement something like this.
And yes, it's a long-running transaction (I suppose?) Perhaps they're
just storing the transaction in an http session so it's still relevant
to the user throughout the
If I were just displaying the lists in a ListView that'd be fine,
however I'm not using it that way.
Suppose myDetachedModel is being displayed in a ListView and on each
iteration, I'm grabbing a value from the database (here's where I need
another detachable model) and doing calculations
Suppose you have
IModel model = new LoadableDetachableModel() { ...
you can get the model any time:
ListItem myItems = (ListItem) model.getObject(null).
First time you call getObject the model is attached (list is loaded).
Until it's detached, getObject(null) will always return the loaded
Excellent, that's perfect. The part I was unsure about was what to
pass for the arguement for getObject()
Thanks Matej!
On 5/31/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose you have
IModel model = new LoadableDetachableModel() { ...
you can get the model any time:
ListItem myItems =
:) Yeah, getObject is a little confusing at the beginning. The parameter
is mostly used in compound models (CompoundPropertyModel) where the
model is shared between multiple components to determine which component
is setting/getting the value.
-Matej
Vincent Jenks wrote:
Excellent, that's
Yes.The markupProvider id that's passed into the fragment constructor pointsto the DefaultDataTable cell id - I'm using a class extending PropertyColumn and
implementing populateItem(Item item, String componentId, IModel model).I thencall item.add(new Fragment(componentId, fragmentId) where
Hmm. Storing transactions in HTTP session is not that big deal.
The question is whether you can have multiple long transaction running
at the same time.
If so, you have to pass the current transaction token between pages
somehow. One possible relatively transparent solution that comes to my
i would imagine if i was working with hibernate directly and wanted to achieve this i would get a session instance, and pass it around to the pages that are part of the same conversationso something likesession s=getsession();
user u=getUser(s);setResponsePage(new ConfirmDeleteUserPage(u, s)and
Yeah, that'd be quite simple for Hibernate alone where you're
utilizing the session manually...however I've never had the problems
I'm having w/ plain Hibernate due to the OpenSessionInView
pattern...which has always worked in that sense.
However, that's very interestinggood approach for a
Hi,
I just started to try Wickets. It' supposed to be so simple to use ! I
first discovered that the Helloworld example won't work. WebApplication
has no getPages() method, but has an abstract getHomePages() method that
needs to be implemented by the HelloWorldApplication class.
Obviously,
On 5/31/06, Pierre-Yves Saumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,I just started to try Wickets. It' supposed to be so simple to use ! Ifirst discovered that the Helloworld example won't work. WebApplicationhas no getPages() method, but has an abstract getHomePages() method that
needs to be implemented
Personally, I've found that every example in wicket-examples has
always worked flawlessly for me.
Each Wicket page has an aptly-named html page that goes with
it...which acts as a template for the components you define in the
aptly-named class.
However, I think you're right, the Hello World
The current trunk of Wicket (core, extensions and examples) has the
constructor change implemented. There is no need for extra
constructors, just for that additional parameter in the constructor.
I wasn't very sure about the constructor change in the first place.
But now that I see that it
I want to check-out the wicket-stuff, in particular wicket-contrib-database.
How do I do that?
Les
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/wicket-stuff-t1714079.html#a4654719
Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.
A trick that work even better is to wrap the models you want to work
with in a model for the sake of passing detach to the wrapped models.
That wrapper model would have a couple of convenience methods to get
the values of the wrapped models, and the wrapper model would be the
model to set on your
I am not familiar with Seam... but I guess it uses stateful session beanto manage all session/transaction to support long-transaction, which named as conversational scope.The whole idea may like:
Session's life cycle is the same as SFSB, and is live for multi-requests.so you won't worry about LIE.
I don't know how to name it, but Shuttle was the name I've seen people using to specify this kind of component:
| Item 1 | | Item 3 |
| Item 2 | | Item 4 || |
| || | | |
|| ||Where:
: move all right : move all selected right... same, but to left sideIf
I might just be nit-picking here...but it might be nice to have a parameter-less override of getObjectjust for prettiness ;) It might be more intuitive for the first-time user as well? It would be more apparent, IMO, if you could just call model.getObject()
Just a thought...
On Wed,
The palette component:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/compref;jsessionid=1964CEEDBD5270FCDA54CFE3AFAE4CB7?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.compref.PalettePage
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 23:32 -0300, Bruno Borges wrote:
I don't know how to name it, but Shuttle was the
I guess that makes sense and is sort of what I assumed...that it was keeping a long-running hibernate session going somehow.
Bah, I guess I could try to rig something up based on everyone's feedback...
Thanks all!
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 10:24 +0800, Ingram Chen wrote:
I am not familiar
svn co https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-contrib-database-Igor
On 5/31/06, middledot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to check-out the wicket-stuff, in particular wicket-contrib-database.How do I do that?Les--View this message in context:
There seems to be a bug in this example. I select the last entry, and
keep on clicking on the first button. Eventually, it moves the entry
from the right side to the left, even though I am clicking on the arrow
pointing from left to right. I am expecting the entry to remain on the
right.
nm,
I upgraded to latest 1.2 (was using rc3) and it went away.
Sorry about the trouble
Aaron
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 21:14 -0700, Aaron Hiniker wrote:
Hi, my application was working fine the other day... recently I've noticed this error pop up and I'm not sure what has changed since...
fixed-IgorOn 5/31/06, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be a bug in this example. I select the last entry, andkeep on clicking on the first button. Eventually, it moves the entryfrom the right side to the left, even though I am clicking on the arrow
pointing from left to right. I am
52 minutes. Not that bad!Dirk2006/6/1, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
fixed-IgorOn 5/31/06, cowwoc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be a bug in this example. I select the last entry, andkeep on clicking on the first button. Eventually, it moves the entryfrom the right side to the left,
50 matches
Mail list logo
