On 11/24/06, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://wicket.sourceforge.net/apidocs/wicket/markup/html/form/ListChoice.html
http://wicket.sourceforge.net/apidocs/wicket/markup/html/form/ListMultipleChoice.html
Thanks, and just found out one cool feature of ListMultipleChoice is
that if the
It's up again. Sorry.
Juergen
On 11/27/06, JFC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.wicket-library.com/
It seems this website is crashed?
JFC Hsieh
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join
Hi all,
I have a 'Item editing' page containing a form. When the form is
submitted I want to return to the 'Item List' page but with fresh data.
In order to do that, after the form is submitted I look for the last
instance of the Item List page in the page map, retrieve some of its
page
[I sent this mail to wicket-develop as well, but I have not seen it
there yet, is that list filtered?]. This is a workaround method for the
wicket developers to solve the problem with Too many open files that a
lot of people have been having. It's a bug in Sun's JarURLConnection (I
reported
So instead of opening a connection inside the jar we just open a connection
to the jar only.
That would work for the app servers that uses the jar url connection but it
won't help
for example WebLogic and others. Because they use there own kind of thing..
johan
On 11/27/06, Sebastiaan van Erk
So we have a problem here where something that maybe tomcat or wicket are
opening too many handles.
The issue are triggered by:
* An exception from wicket
* Message from wicket that the page has expired
* Usage of a specific component that uses AJAX (might be a exception in
On 11/23/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Usually I use following code to assert component under a Panel
tester.assertComponent(DummyPanelPage.TEST_PANEL_ID+:+componentId,
componentClass);
However, it don't work with fragment, is that I need to do
something special for
On 11/14/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look like it is more easier to show a sortable and pagable table than
using DataView. However if I need to show more than property from an
object. Like a BookmarkablePageLink , How should I do? Look like I
need to extended a custom
Hi everyone,
I'm new to wicket and have a simple question:
I want to display a dropdown choice but I don't want to bind the entire
list of objects in it. Is there a simple way to bind a key-value pair
and get into a property the selected Id and not the selected object
(like .Net
Databinder 1.1 will use sessionFactory.getCurrentSession() within all
models. The default behavior will be a ManagedSessionContext bound
inside DataRequestCycle, but you can turn that off if you want to use
JTA or Spring-managed transactions:
Hi,
I have a best practice question: I have a page with several panels,
each of them having a few Labels. This page shows a summary of the
customer infos. Each panel has a Change link that opens a page to
change the data. Since the panels can be embedded in different pages, I
want to go back
Hi all,
This problem has cropped up a couple of times on this list.
Do you think we should add it to the Gotchas section of the wiki?
just my 2 cents. :)
/j.
Flemming Boller wrote:
I am glad to help you :-)
On 11/27/06, *Nino Wael* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/27/06, James Carnegie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
This problem has cropped up a couple of times on this list.
Do you think we should add it to the Gotchas section of the wiki?
just my 2 cents. :)
/j.
We should.
Eelco
Carfield Yim a écrit :
On 11/14/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
However, if I like to display a link, I will not work if I just add a
BookmarkableLink like
private static class OrderIdColumn extends AbstractColumn {
public OrderIdColumn() {
On 11/27/06, Sebastiaan van Erk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[I sent this mail to wicket-develop as well, but I have not seen it
there yet, is that list filtered?]
The old dev list is shut down. You should have received a message
stating this. Now that we're incubating Wicket, we moved the dev list
* James Carnegie:
This problem has cropped up a couple of times on this list.
Do you think we should add it to the Gotchas section of the
wiki?
This issue is a real show stopper. Several users have reported to
me with painful setting into production of Wicket apps.
IMO we should
We could still apply this common case, and maybe test for the specific
ones (web logic, which uses a zip variant, right?) if possible. WDYT
Johan?
Eelco
On 11/27/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So instead of opening a connection inside the jar we just open a connection
to the jar
* Johan Compagner:
So instead of opening a connection inside the jar we just open a
connection to the jar only. That would work for the app servers
that uses the jar url connection but it won't help for example
WebLogic and others. Because they use there own kind of thing..
We need to
Could you please open an issue for this case?
Thanks,
Eelco
On 11/27/06, Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we have a problem here where something that maybe tomcat or wicket are
opening too many handles.
The issue are triggered by:
An exception from wicket
Message from wicket
Ah, ok, so by configuring a LSFB in Spring I could use databinder 1.1
in conjunction with all my other spring configured services?
This factory bean will by default expose a transaction-aware
SessionFactory proxy, letting data access code work with the plain
Hibernate SessionFactory and its
IMO we should disable the shaky code that reloads templates from
JARs (shaky not because of Wicket, but because of the JVM), and
provide a setting to *optionally* re-activate it for the few users
that really need this.
I'm also in favor of turning this off by default, but in a slightly
I just had a chance to test notice.notice. Here's what I got:
java.util.MissingResourceException: Unable to find resource: notice
for component: regInProgress
On 11/26/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried notice.notice=My text with ${foo}
?
Martijn
On 11/26/06,
You should make sure those two tabs each have their own pagemap.
Wicket tries as much as it can to do this automatically, but it helps
if you do this manually as well.
Eelco
On 11/27/06, Nili Adoram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a 'Item editing' page containing a form. When the
On 11/27/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
provide a setting to *optionally* re-activate it for the few users
that really need this.
All users really need this when developing. We already have two modes
for operation: development and deployment. It is not that hard to
comprehend
On 11/27/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/27/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
provide a setting to *optionally* re-activate it for the few users
that really need this.
All users really need this when developing. We already have two modes
for operation:
Sounds like a good idea. For now, let's put a link on the front page to each
projects wiki. I am going to make an effort this week to theme the wiki
similar to the current wicket-stuff. I am hoping to put a left panel in that
provides navigation to each projects wiki. I'll get a backup/restore
I would suggest sticking with moin until we know for sure it can't give us
what we need. Also, I'm not sure we need to force the entire website on to
the wiki. Let's leave that to the individual maintainers.
I've added a rewrite rule to hide the /cgi-bin/moin.cgi under /wiki-stuff,
per
I have a WebResource which generates a stylesheet (css). How can I get a url
for this resource to pass in to the HeaderContributor.forCss() ?
Cheers,
-js
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join
When your application is set to production mode wicket tags will get
stripped leaving just plain html.
-js
On 11/27/06, Francisco Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I just wanted to know if it's indeed possible (and how) to change
wicket control generated words such as
:wicket:interface: ,
One of the ideas behind IRequestCodingStrategy was to enable this.
Unfortunately, the default implementation of this,
WebRequestCodingStrategy leaks implementation details with it's public
static strings. Surprise, surprise, these fields are used by other
classes, this it wouldn't be able to
Doh, I miss understood his question, dis-regard my previous reply.
-js
On 11/27/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the ideas behind IRequestCodingStrategy was to enable this.
Unfortunately, the default implementation of this,
WebRequestCodingStrategy leaks implementation
Just print out directly like this:
add(new StringHeaderContributor(link rel=\stylesheet\
type=\text/css\ href=\ + RequestCycle.get().urlFor(myResource) +
\ /));
Or something like that.
Eelco
On 11/27/06, Jonathan Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a WebResource which generates a stylesheet
On 11/27/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could add to the quickstart project's pom a filter that alters the
mode from development to deployment when a war is built.
But why not make deployment the default. Really, that makes so much
more sense to me.
Because then you have to
On 11/27/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/27/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could add to the quickstart project's pom a filter that alters the
mode from development to deployment when a war is built.
But why not make deployment the default. Really, that
I like this idea too.
Perhaps Wicket should also output in the logs something like.. developement
mode active, remember to switch to production mode when going live...
That way I think you guys have covered every chance to help users of wicket.
/Flemming
On 11/27/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL
I would gladly added this information to the wiki pages if you can help me
point me out which section would be a good place to add it.
/Flemming
On 11/27/06, James Carnegie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
This problem has cropped up a couple of times on this list.
Do you think we should
Perhaps Wicket should also output in the logs something like.. developement
mode active, remember to switch to production mode when going live...
We actually already do that. Maybe we could do it more obviously,
though otoh you don't want Wicket to output too much either.
Eelco
Yes, but not the small addition (which might have helped others)
Remember to switch to production mode (web.xml)
or another way to signal that development mode is not good for production
:-)
/Flemming
On 11/27/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps Wicket should also output
On 11/27/06, Flemming Boller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but not the small addition (which might have helped others)
Remember to switch to production mode (web.xml)
or another way to signal that development mode is not good for production
:-)
Fair enough. Anyone in the game for opening up
ive ran into this a couple of times myself.
there are two options
pass in a list of ids as the model and have ichoicerenderer resolve the id
to the text string
or work with pojos and have the model perform the conversion from object to
id and from id to object
-igor
On 11/27/06, Beto Siless
in the address panel
changelink.onclick() { setresponsepage(new EditAddrPage(getPage(), addr)); }
in edit address page
EditAddrPage { EditAddrPage(final Page back, Addr addr) { saveLink.onclick()
{ savechange(); setresponstpage(back); }}}
-igor
On 11/27/06, Johannes Fahrenkrug [EMAIL
ha!
why is everybody so pro deployment mode as default?
When i was busy doing the changes in that area (adding the system property
and so on)
i asked and wanted to have deployment as default but back then i was
vetoed..
another thing. We need to check in jar files!! Please remember the osgi
No we as a framework should think about ALL users not MOST users.
And we have quit a lot OSGI users as far as i know. And we should work
in that environment as good as we can.
So we need to check jars. And besides that we don't know it everytime that
it is a jar..
It is just and url..
johan
We need a default that works for most users and via options something
that works for all. If we have something that by default works for
all, that's all the better.
Eelco
On 11/27/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No we as a framework should think about ALL users not MOST users.
How customize your cell table :
You may create a panel which contains only your link :
wicket:panel
a wicket:id=mylinkspan wicket:id=mytext/span/a
/wicket:panel
and in the populateItem:
MyPanel panel = new MyPanel(componentId);
cellItem.add(panel);
And in your panel constructor
How do I do that?
How do I recognize that an instance of that page is currently active
within a different browser tab?
Should I explore all page maps?
Thanks,
-- Nili
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
You should make sure those two tabs each have their own pagemap.
Wicket tries as much as it can to do
you add the link to the panel/fragment and then add that into the cell
-igor
On 11/27/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How customize your cell table :
You may create a panel which contains only your link :
wicket:panel
a wicket:id=mylinkspan wicket:id=mytext/span/a
There's a trick in Wicket that tries to match the window name and the
page map name. This works in many cases. You'll find the script in
class WebPage, and if you use links with popup specs and a proper page
map etc, or e.g. open a new tab and paste your current URL in, you'll
find it works in
whatever does not work, can you reproduce it in a quickstart so we can debug
it?
-igor
On 11/27/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a trick in Wicket that tries to match the window name and the
page map name. This works in many cases. You'll find the script in
class WebPage,
49 matches
Mail list logo
