Re: [Wicket-user] How can I do URL mapping in wicket?

2006-12-19 Thread Carfield Yim
I have, but in the AbstractPageAuthorizationStrategy, I have skip the
registration.class already. In fact, I need the uri mapping work with
authorization scheme, is it not possible?

And even I remove that AbstractPageAuthorizationStrategy, I still have
this behaviour.

On 12/19/06, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Perhaps you made Registration protected with some kind of authorization
 scheme?

  Erik.

 Carfield Yim schreef:
  I don't know why but I cannot get it to work,
 
  After I add the map, say
  mountBookmarkablePage(/signup, Registration.class);
 
  If I go to URL:
 
  http://192.168.1.79:8080/wicket/app/signup
 
  then wicket forward me to
 
  http://192.168.1.79:8080/wicket/app/signup?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:com.xxx.base.Logon
 
  And just show the login page instead of registration page
 
 
 

 --
 Erik van Oosten
 http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/


 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


[Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form

2006-12-19 Thread Carfield Yim
This look really cool, I just define the bean and the framework
determine HTML input type for me, is that similar support from wicket
for this?

http://beanform.sourceforge.net/

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form

2006-12-19 Thread Paolo Di Tommaso

Quite interesting.

Although Wicket use a different approach that requires explicitly to map
html fields to java objects - and this is what makes it so great - there are
situation where would be very useful to have a component like that (for
example for fast application prototyping ..).


Moreover it would be quite easy to implement extending a panel and using a
just bit of reflection .


Wicket gurus what do you think about?


- Paolo


On 12/19/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


This look really cool, I just define the bean and the framework
determine HTML input type for me, is that similar support from wicket
for this?

http://beanform.sourceforge.net/

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


[Wicket-user] wrung acquaintance

2006-12-19 Thread Reg K. Pike

Such feelings are also influenced by advertising and a consumer culture run 
amok, which Wallin says suggests to her that people  are always looking for 
something to make our lives easier. To prevent this way-too-fast reboot, follow 
these easy to follow instructions to disable the automatic restart on system 
failure.
We willen hiernaartoe voor een sneeuw-actief week.
The more an item penetrates the culture, the more applications it has and the 
more we rely on it, she says. Maar voordat de topkok aan de slag gaat met het 
kerstmenu moet hij eerst zelf de witvis vangen en een rendierfarm bezoeken voor 
het vlees. PST in the Academy's Samuel Goldwyn Theater.
The front garden uses the structural form of succulent plants such as 
euphorbias and yuccas to reinforce the design of the . None showed signs of 
having been subjected to significant trauma or serious sexual assault before 
dying, fueling speculation that the killer might have been a drug dealer who 
doped them. Infrequently handled cavies are not. Buiten is het een kerstkaart!
Wat mij nog niet helemaal duidelijk is geworden is de regeling die we in 
Nederland kennen als de hypotheekrenteaftrek.
CONTEST: Win Huge Prizes from We Are Marshall!
He's the king, says his friend, sometime business partner and New York 
antique dealer Martin Lane.
This visual, step by step guide to performing a clean installation of Windows 
XP will help you through every step of the way! The more an item penetrates the 
culture, the more applications it has and the more we rely on it, she says.
Na bijna anderhalf uur was het aardoppervlak dusdanig afgekoeld dat het ook 
bleef liggen.
But if things turn sour, look out.
CONTEST: Win The Charlotte's Web Soundtrack! With the day light on economic 
news, a rash of merger news fueled activity.
Changing a light bulb seems like such a small thing but when you add up all the 
energy-saving light bulbs being installed all over the country, we're making 
BIG changes.
Such feelings are also influenced by advertising and a consumer culture run 
amok, which Wallin says suggests to her that people  are always looking for 
something to make our lives easier. Low-growing plants are preferred, but if 
using taller plants, pinch back their tips occasionally.

liberally.gif
Description: GIF image
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form

2006-12-19 Thread Ayodeji Aladejebi

this is not so difficult to do on a base level in wicket...it just
that i wished the wicket committers could work on a very robust
infastructure for this because really we eventually get tired of
typing textfields for each property in various beans. there used to be
bean panel in wicket but suddenly they dropped it from the extensions.
but i made something similar for a project where i needed dynamic
forms. wait i could even zip up the small sample i used to experiement
this.

just attach to any existing wicket project and use the sample bean

On 12/19/06, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Quite interesting.

Although Wicket use a different approach that requires explicitly to map
html fields to java objects - and this is what makes it so great - there are
situation where would be very useful to have a component like that (for
example for fast application prototyping ..).


Moreover it would be quite easy to implement extending a panel and using a
just bit of reflection .


Wicket gurus what do you think about?


- Paolo


On 12/19/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This look really cool, I just define the bean and the framework
 determine HTML input type for me, is that similar support from wicket
 for this?

 http://beanform.sourceforge.net/

 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user






--
Aladejebi Ayodeji A.,

DabarObjects Solutions
Phone: 234 9 273 2 555
Mobile: +234 803 589 1780
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.dabarobjects.com
Blog: blog.dabarobjects.com

Participate, Collaborate, Innovate
Join Community:
http://www.cowblock.net/

Get A Free Blog:
http://blogs.cowblock.net/


dynamicform.rar
Description: application/rar-compressed
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Why I recommended Wicket...

2006-12-19 Thread Frank Silbermann
Indeed.  One might say that Wicket is better than most other frameworks
for the same reason that C++ is better than C, that Java is better than
Pascal, or that Smalltalk is better than Basic.  Wicket allows you to
use inheritance to help re-use webpages.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan
Sonnek
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 5:02 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Why I recommended Wicket...




Other points of consideration is long term maintenance. A
component oriented framework like Wicket encapsulates component
functionality into a black box that can be used in many different
contexts and still work as designed. The same effect is very difficult
to achieve with custom tags (especially when they have external
dependencies like javascript, etc). 


Well said.  I think this is one of the best accomplishments of wicket.
IMO, re-usable JSP tags are nearly impossible, while reusable wicket
components are extremely quick and easy to use. 

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Why I recommended Wicket...

2006-12-19 Thread Otan

Wicket is the framework that I've been looking for for a long time. The
certain feature of wicket that made itself the fovorite of mine is it
doesn't allow me (and anyone from my co-programmers) to put programming
logic in the markup. A little wicket-specific tags, one wicket:id attribute
and that's it. Page authors in my team is very happy because they don't have
to learn and memorize gazillions of web framework tags anymore. All they
have to concern about is html/css/javascript and their beloved Dreamweaver.
And aside from this, they can preview the page that they are designing. And
they don't have to be bothered anymore by programmers very often.

IMO, this is the true separation of concerns between programmers and visual
designers.  Programmers have concern only about java code. They don't have
to intervene frequently with the designer's markup (majority of programmers
can't do visually appealing pages, in the first place). Likewise, designers
have concern only about the html pages.  They don't have to, or they hate
to, see programming logic in the html markup.


On 15/12/06, Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


A few months ago I wrote to the Wicket user list explaining that I was
investigating view frameworks for a large enterprise project. This is a
follow up to that post explaining why I recommended Wicket. It may be useful
for other people who are going through the same decision process.

First a bit about my background. I have been building java web
applications for about 6 years. During this time I worked with custom jsp
view frameworks, struts, spring mvc, and tapestry. I spent the last two
years working very closely with Tapestry 3 (and a small amount with Tapestry
4) on several high throughput/high availability web applications for a large
dot com. Assume for the rest of this email I am evaluating web frameworks
for large projects that will be maintained and enhanced for the foreseeable
future (choosing a view framework for a quick, small, one-off application is
a very different discussion).

---

I have read a considerable amount about the different view frameworks out
there the past few months. While each have their merits I decided to focus
on JSF (myfaces), Spring MVC, and Wicket for the purpose of doing a deeper
examination and small prototype application. That does not mean that Seam,
Rife, Trails, Tapestry, etc are not worth looking at but in my opinion the
three I choose were the best of breed for their type. I quickly determined
that myfaces was not for me. I liked its form handling and navigation
support but I did not like all the javascript and extra markup that was
inserted into every page without me asking for it.

Spring in general is a great project and I can not speak highly enough
about the products they produce. One very important contrast between Spring
MVC and other frameworks (especially Wicket) is that Spring MVC is bare
bones. It really is just a MVC framework. If you want infrastructure for
ajax, redirect after post, poups, and other common webisms you will need to
build them yourself with Spring MVC. This can be a good thing if you have
unique requirements that should be custom built in the first place but for
most projects this is not the case. Other points of consideration is long
term maintenance. A component oriented framework like Wicket encapsulates
component functionality into a black box that can be used in many different
contexts and still work as designed. The same effect is very difficult to
achieve with custom tags (especially when they have external dependencies
like javascript, etc).

The Benefits of Wicket:
1. All configuration is done in java. In my opinion this is a huge plus.
This helps development as well as long term maintenance because there is one
place to look for view logic. Frameworks like Tapestry or JSP that allow you
to place configuration in any number of places which makes it difficult to
track down the source of a bug. Using java also allows you to use
refactoring tools which can be a big boost in productivity during
development and makes it easier to verify what your changes may effect.

2. Well thought out support for common webisms (ajax, redirect after post,
etc). Instead of spending development time figuring out how you are going to
wire dwr or your own ajax framework Wicket provides a great foundation for
building ajax enabled components. The redirect after post problem is
something that every web application has to solve at one point or another
and Wicket provides 3 very good solutions out of the box.

3. Strong community with active core members. The project looks very
healthy and has a bright future ahead.

4. Powerful model abstraction. At first the Model abstraction doesn't look
very impressive but in practice it is a very powerful design pattern that
works well with the rest of the framework.


Negatives of Wicket:
1. Session support. Many other web frameworks do not use sessions out of
the box. Wicket uses the session 

Re: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form

2006-12-19 Thread Stefan Lindner
Maybe that this feature sounds/looks great at first sight. But in every web 
application I wrote with other tools than wicket, which had this feature, I 
quickly ran into situatins where this did not lead any further. And the 
automatically generated forms often look really ugly. The order and the size of 
the input fields.
I prefer the wicket way where i'm totally free in designing my forms.
 
Stefan Lindner



Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Di 19.12.2006 15:12
An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Wicket-user Digest, Vol 7, Issue 117



Send Wicket-user mailing list submissions to
wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Wicket-user digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Directly map a bean to HTML form (Carfield Yim)
   2. Re: Directly map a bean to HTML form (Paolo Di Tommaso)
   3. wrung acquaintance (Reg K. Pike)
   4. Re: Directly map a bean to HTML form (Ayodeji Aladejebi)


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:19:47 +0800
From: Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

This look really cool, I just define the bean and the framework
determine HTML input type for me, is that similar support from wicket
for this?

http://beanform.sourceforge.net/



--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:49:15 +0100
From: Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Quite interesting.

Although Wicket use a different approach that requires explicitly to map
html fields to java objects - and this is what makes it so great - there are
situation where would be very useful to have a component like that (for
example for fast application prototyping ..).


Moreover it would be quite easy to implement extending a panel and using a
just bit of reflection .


Wicket gurus what do you think about?


- Paolo


On 12/19/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This look really cool, I just define the bean and the framework
 determine HTML input type for me, is that similar support from wicket
 for this?

 http://beanform.sourceforge.net/

 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=wicket-user/attachments/20061219/3f496798/attachment.html

--

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:44:15 +0700
From: Reg K. Pike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Wicket-user] wrung acquaintance
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252


Such feelings are also influenced by advertising and a consumer culture run 
amok, which Wallin says suggests to her that people  are always looking for 
something to make our lives easier. To prevent this way-too-fast reboot, follow 
these easy to follow instructions to disable the automatic restart on system 
failure.
We willen hiernaartoe voor een sneeuw-actief week.
The more an item penetrates the culture, the more applications it has and the 
more we rely on it, she says. Maar voordat de topkok aan de slag gaat met het 
kerstmenu moet hij eerst zelf de witvis vangen en een rendierfarm bezoeken voor 
het vlees. PST in the Academy's Samuel Goldwyn Theater.
The front garden uses the structural form of succulent plants such as 
euphorbias and yuccas to reinforce the design of the . None showed signs of 
having been subjected to significant trauma or serious sexual assault before 
dying, fueling speculation that the killer might have been a drug dealer who 
doped them. Infrequently handled cavies are not. Buiten is het een kerstkaart!
Wat mij nog niet helemaal duidelijk is geworden is de regeling die we in 
Nederland kennen als de

[Wicket-user] Custom AttributeModifier - Add attribute even when not pre-existing?

2006-12-19 Thread Jonathan Sharp

I wrote a custom AttributeModifier as below and it works great if there's an
existing CSS class attached to a tag. Is there another method I could
implement?

c.add(new AttributeModifier(class, new Model(cls)) {
   private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

   protected String newValue(final String currentValue,
final String replacementValue) {
   System.out.println(Current, New:  + currentValue +
,  + replacementValue);
   return  + replacementValue +   + currentValue;
   }
   });

Cheers,
-js
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Custom AttributeModifier - Add attribute even when not pre-existing?

2006-12-19 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Use SimpleAttributeModifier instead, or in the case of appending the
value to your attribute, use AttributeAppender

Martijn

On 12/19/06, Jonathan Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I wrote a custom AttributeModifier as below and it works great if there's an
 existing CSS class attached to a tag. Is there another method I could
 implement?

 c.add(new AttributeModifier(class, new Model(cls)) {
 private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

 protected String newValue(final String currentValue,
 final String replacementValue) {
  System.out.println(Current, New:  + currentValue
 + ,  + replacementValue);
 return  + replacementValue +   + currentValue;
 }
 });

 Cheers,
 -js

 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user





-- 
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.3 is as easy as 1-2-3. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form

2006-12-19 Thread Paolo Di Tommaso

Stefan, you are absolutely right.

I agree with you that to achive a production result you need to write a
detailed html.

But a BeanPanel would be very useful in the first project iterations or to
make an application prototype.

This could improve a lot a project startup time.


- Paolo



On 12/19/06, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Maybe that this feature sounds/looks great at first sight. But in every
web application I wrote with other tools than wicket, which had this
feature, I quickly ran into situatins where this did not lead any further.
And the automatically generated forms often look really ugly. The order and
the size of the input fields.
I prefer the wicket way where i'm totally free in designing my forms.

Stefan Lindner



Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag von
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Di 19.12.2006 15:12
An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Wicket-user Digest, Vol 7, Issue 117



Send Wicket-user mailing list submissions to
wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Wicket-user digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Directly map a bean to HTML form (Carfield Yim)
   2. Re: Directly map a bean to HTML form (Paolo Di Tommaso)
   3. wrung acquaintance (Reg K. Pike)
   4. Re: Directly map a bean to HTML form (Ayodeji Aladejebi)


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:19:47 +0800
From: Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

This look really cool, I just define the bean and the framework
determine HTML input type for me, is that similar support from wicket
for this?

http://beanform.sourceforge.net/



--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:49:15 +0100
From: Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Quite interesting.

Although Wicket use a different approach that requires explicitly to map
html fields to java objects - and this is what makes it so great - there
are
situation where would be very useful to have a component like that (for
example for fast application prototyping ..).


Moreover it would be quite easy to implement extending a panel and using a
just bit of reflection .


Wicket gurus what do you think about?


- Paolo


On 12/19/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This look really cool, I just define the bean and the framework
 determine HTML input type for me, is that similar support from wicket
 for this?

 http://beanform.sourceforge.net/


-
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=wicket-user/attachments/20061219/3f496798/attachment.html

--

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:44:15 +0700
From: Reg K. Pike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Wicket-user] wrung acquaintance
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252


Such feelings are also influenced by advertising and a consumer culture
run amok, which Wallin says suggests to her that people  are always looking
for something to make our lives easier. To prevent this way-too-fast reboot,
follow these easy to follow instructions to disable the automatic restart on
system failure.
We willen hiernaartoe voor een sneeuw-actief week.
The more an item penetrates the culture, the more applications it has and
the more we rely on it, she says. Maar voordat de topkok aan de slag gaat
met het kerstmenu moet hij eerst zelf de witvis vangen en een rendierfarm
bezoeken voor het vlees. PST in the Academy's Samuel Goldwyn Theater.
The front garden uses the structural form of succulent plants such as
euphorbias and yuccas to reinforce the design of the . None showed signs of
having been

Re: [Wicket-user] Can I hangle some html without WebMarkupContainer

2006-12-19 Thread Konstantin

Thanks.


igor.vaynberg wrote:
 
 noep, this is not how component oriented frameworks work. in wicket a
 component is attached to a markup tag.
 
 since  #  foo   is two tags then you need two
 components
 
 however, the nice thing about component oriented frameworks is that you
 can
 composite components
 
 so you can make a panel that houses a bookmarkablepagelink and an img
 component, and then its use within your code would be like what you
 described
 
 -igor
 
 
 On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




 igor.vaynberg wrote:
 
  where would you put the code that changes the src attr?
 
  -igor
 
  it is my question :-)
  I thought of something like:
  add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink,
  MapFindPage.class).componentInternals(img tag full string here));
 
 
  On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  HTML:
 
  #
  imgs/map_find.gif
 
  Code:
  add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink, MapFindPage.class
 ));
 
 
  Now I need to change src of img. Can I do that without boring
  WebMarkupContainer and add(new Image().add(new
 SimpleAttributeModifier())
  in
  constructor of that ?
 
  Wicket 1.2.
  --
  View this message in context:
 
 http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-hangle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950328
  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 
 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share
  your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 
 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
  your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-handle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950433
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

 
 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-handle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950919
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] How can I do URL mapping in wicket?

2006-12-19 Thread Igor Vaynberg

working fine over here, make sure your auth strategy really is skipping that
class

-igor


On 12/19/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On 12/19/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have, but in the AbstractPageAuthorizationStrategy, I have skip the
 registration.class already. In fact, I need the uri mapping work with
 authorization scheme, is it not possible?

Just wonder, is it really cannot be done?

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form

2006-12-19 Thread Igor Vaynberg

i have a bean panel, and what i do is put the label and the
formcomponent/panel into a border. i have a factory method on the panel that
lets users define their own borders so they can easily change the look and
feel of the panel.

-igor


On 12/19/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


the only thing that actually limits the feature is what has been
mentioned. Styling the generated forms to taste.

On 12/19/06, Igor Vaynberg  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 we dropped it from extensions because there was not enough interest in
 it and it was a pita to maintain. if there is interest now then you guys can
 feel free to start a wicket-stuff project, once it has evolved there to
 something useful we wouldnt mind readding it to extensions.

 -igor


 On 12/19/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  this is not so difficult to do on a base level in wicket...it just
  that i wished the wicket committers could work on a very robust
  infastructure for this because really we eventually get tired of
  typing textfields for each property in various beans. there used to be
 
  bean panel in wicket but suddenly they dropped it from the extensions.
  but i made something similar for a project where i needed dynamic
  forms. wait i could even zip up the small sample i used to experiement
  this.
 
  just attach to any existing wicket project and use the sample bean
 
  On 12/19/06, Paolo Di Tommaso  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Quite interesting.
  
   Although Wicket use a different approach that requires explicitly to
  map
   html fields to java objects - and this is what makes it so great -
  there are
   situation where would be very useful to have a component like that
  (for
   example for fast application prototyping ..).
  
  
   Moreover it would be quite easy to implement extending a panel and
  using a
   just bit of reflection .
  
  
   Wicket gurus what do you think about?
  
  
   - Paolo
  
  
   On 12/19/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
   
This look really cool, I just define the bean and the framework
determine HTML input type for me, is that similar support from
  wicket
for this?
   
http://beanform.sourceforge.net/
   
   
  -
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
  share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
  cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
   
  
  
 
 
  --
  Aladejebi Ayodeji A.,
 
  DabarObjects Solutions
  Phone: 234 9 273 2 555
  Mobile: +234 803 589 1780
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Web: www.dabarobjects.com
  Blog: blog.dabarobjects.com
 
  Participate, Collaborate, Innovate
  Join Community:
  http://www.cowblock.net/
 
  Get A Free Blog:
  http://blogs.cowblock.net/
 
 
  -
 
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
  share your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
  http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 
 
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 
 


 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user







-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

[Wicket-user] Can I hangle some html without WebMarkupContainer

2006-12-19 Thread Konstantin

HTML:

a href=# id=mapFindLink wicket:id = mapFindLink
img src=imgs/map_find.gif name=mapFind width=122 height=51
border=0/ /a

Code:
add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink, MapFindPage.class));


Now I need to change src of img. Can I do that without boring
WebMarkupContainer and add(new Image().add(new SimpleAttributeModifier()) in
constructor of that ?

Wicket 1.2.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-hangle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950328
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Can I hangle some html without WebMarkupContainer

2006-12-19 Thread Konstantin



igor.vaynberg wrote:
 
 where would you put the code that changes the src attr?
 
 -igor
 
 it is my question :-)
 I thought of something like:
 add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink,
 MapFindPage.class).componentInternals(img tag full string here));
 
 
 On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 HTML:

 #
 imgs/map_find.gif

 Code:
 add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink, MapFindPage.class));


 Now I need to change src of img. Can I do that without boring
 WebMarkupContainer and add(new Image().add(new SimpleAttributeModifier())
 in
 constructor of that ?

 Wicket 1.2.
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-hangle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950328
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

 
 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-handle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950433
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Can I hangle some html without WebMarkupContainer

2006-12-19 Thread Igor Vaynberg

there is also this from a post yesterday that makes working with static imgs
simpler

class staticimage extends webcomponent {

public staticimage(string id, imodel model) {
   super(id, model);
 }

 protected void oncomponenttag(tag) {
 checkcomponenttag(tag, img);
 tag.put(src, getModelObjectAsString());
   }
}

-igor



On 12/19/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


where would you put the code that changes the src attr?

-igor


On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:


 HTML:

 #
 imgs/map_find.gif

 Code:
 add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink, MapFindPage.class));


 Now I need to change src of img. Can I do that without boring
 WebMarkupContainer and add(new Image().add(new
 SimpleAttributeModifier()) in
 constructor of that ?

 Wicket 1.2.
 --
 View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-hangle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950328

 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form

2006-12-19 Thread Ayodeji Aladejebi

the only thing that actually limits the feature is what has been mentioned.
Styling the generated forms to taste.

On 12/19/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


we dropped it from extensions because there was not enough interest in it
and it was a pita to maintain. if there is interest now then you guys can
feel free to start a wicket-stuff project, once it has evolved there to
something useful we wouldnt mind readding it to extensions.

-igor


On 12/19/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 this is not so difficult to do on a base level in wicket...it just
 that i wished the wicket committers could work on a very robust
 infastructure for this because really we eventually get tired of
 typing textfields for each property in various beans. there used to be
 bean panel in wicket but suddenly they dropped it from the extensions.
 but i made something similar for a project where i needed dynamic
 forms. wait i could even zip up the small sample i used to experiement
 this.

 just attach to any existing wicket project and use the sample bean

 On 12/19/06, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Quite interesting.
 
  Although Wicket use a different approach that requires explicitly to
 map
  html fields to java objects - and this is what makes it so great -
 there are
  situation where would be very useful to have a component like that
 (for
  example for fast application prototyping ..).
 
 
  Moreover it would be quite easy to implement extending a panel and
 using a
  just bit of reflection .
 
 
  Wicket gurus what do you think about?
 
 
  - Paolo
 
 
  On 12/19/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   This look really cool, I just define the bean and the framework
   determine HTML input type for me, is that similar support from
 wicket
   for this?
  
   http://beanform.sourceforge.net/
  
  
 -
   Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
   Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share
   your
   opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
 cash
   http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
 
 


 --
 Aladejebi Ayodeji A.,

 DabarObjects Solutions
 Phone: 234 9 273 2 555
 Mobile: +234 803 589 1780
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Web: www.dabarobjects.com
 Blog: blog.dabarobjects.com

 Participate, Collaborate, Innovate
 Join Community:
 http://www.cowblock.net/

 Get A Free Blog:
 http://blogs.cowblock.net/


 -

 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user





-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] How can I do URL mapping in wicket?

2006-12-19 Thread Carfield Yim
On 12/19/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have, but in the AbstractPageAuthorizationStrategy, I have skip the
 registration.class already. In fact, I need the uri mapping work with
 authorization scheme, is it not possible?

Just wonder, is it really cannot be done?

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Can I hangle some html without WebMarkupContainer

2006-12-19 Thread Konstantin

I don't quite understand how panel helps me here...
I have nested tag and when I try to
add(new BookmarkablePageLink(awicketid).add(new Image(imgwicketid))) I
get WicketMessage: Unable to find component with id 'imgwicketid' in
[MarkupContainer [Component id = awicketid ...

what is wrong here, can you point it out ?

How can I handle nested tags ?



igor.vaynberg wrote:
 
 noep, this is not how component oriented frameworks work. in wicket a
 component is attached to a markup tag.
 
 since  #  foo   is two tags then you need two
 components
 
 however, the nice thing about component oriented frameworks is that you
 can
 composite components
 
 so you can make a panel that houses a bookmarkablepagelink and an img
 component, and then its use within your code would be like what you
 described
 
 -igor
 
 
 On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




 igor.vaynberg wrote:
 
  where would you put the code that changes the src attr?
 
  -igor
 
  it is my question :-)
  I thought of something like:
  add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink,
  MapFindPage.class).componentInternals(img tag full string here));
 
 
  On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  HTML:
 
  #
  imgs/map_find.gif
 
  Code:
  add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink, MapFindPage.class
 ));
 
 
  Now I need to change src of img. Can I do that without boring
  WebMarkupContainer and add(new Image().add(new
 SimpleAttributeModifier())
  in
  constructor of that ?
 
  Wicket 1.2.
  --
  View this message in context:
 
 http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-hangle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950328
  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 
 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share
  your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 
 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
  your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-handle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950433
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

 
 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-handle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7951949
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Can I hangle some html without WebMarkupContainer

2006-12-19 Thread Igor Vaynberg

class bookmarkablepageimglink extends panel {
  public bookmarkablepageimglink(string id, class page, string image) {
  super(id);
  setrenderbodyonly(true);
  bookmarkablepagelink link=new bookmarkablepagelink(page);
  add(link);
  link.add(new staticimage(img, new model(image));
   }
}

bookmarkablepageimglink.html
wicket:panel
a href=# wicket:id=linkimg wicket:id=img//a
/wicket:panel

then in your code

add(new bookmarkablepageimglink(mylink, mypage.class, foo.gif));

and in html

a href=# wicket:id=mylinkmy image link/a

-igor


On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I don't quite understand how panel helps me here...
I have nested tag and when I try to
add(new BookmarkablePageLink(awicketid).add(new Image(imgwicketid))) I
get WicketMessage: Unable to find component with id 'imgwicketid' in
[MarkupContainer [Component id = awicketid ...

what is wrong here, can you point it out ?

How can I handle nested tags ?



igor.vaynberg wrote:

 noep, this is not how component oriented frameworks work. in wicket a
 component is attached to a markup tag.

 since  #  foo   is two tags then you need two
 components

 however, the nice thing about component oriented frameworks is that you
 can
 composite components

 so you can make a panel that houses a bookmarkablepagelink and an img
 component, and then its use within your code would be like what you
 described

 -igor


 On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




 igor.vaynberg wrote:
 
  where would you put the code that changes the src attr?
 
  -igor
 
  it is my question :-)
  I thought of something like:
  add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink,
  MapFindPage.class).componentInternals(img tag full string here));
 
 
  On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  HTML:
 
  #
  imgs/map_find.gif
 
  Code:
  add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink,
MapFindPage.class
 ));
 
 
  Now I need to change src of img. Can I do that without boring
  WebMarkupContainer and add(new Image().add(new
 SimpleAttributeModifier())
  in
  constructor of that ?
 
  Wicket 1.2.
  --
  View this message in context:
 

http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-hangle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950328
  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 

-
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share
  your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
cash
 

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 

-
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share
  your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
cash
 

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 

 --
 View this message in context:

http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-handle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950433
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-handle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7951949
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get 

Re: [Wicket-user] Can I hangle some html without WebMarkupContainer

2006-12-19 Thread Igor Vaynberg

noep, this is not how component oriented frameworks work. in wicket a
component is attached to a markup tag.

since a href=#img src=foo//a is two tags then you need two
components

however, the nice thing about component oriented frameworks is that you can
composite components

so you can make a panel that houses a bookmarkablepagelink and an img
component, and then its use within your code would be like what you
described

-igor


On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:





igor.vaynberg wrote:

 where would you put the code that changes the src attr?

 -igor

 it is my question :-)
 I thought of something like:
 add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink,
 MapFindPage.class).componentInternals(img tag full string here));


 On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 HTML:

 #
 imgs/map_find.gif

 Code:
 add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink, MapFindPage.class
));


 Now I need to change src of img. Can I do that without boring
 WebMarkupContainer and add(new Image().add(new
SimpleAttributeModifier())
 in
 constructor of that ?

 Wicket 1.2.
 --
 View this message in context:

http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-hangle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950328
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-handle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950433
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Can I hangle some html without WebMarkupContainer

2006-12-19 Thread Konstantin

Never would guessed myself too complex. Maybe it's because it's my first web
framework experience :-)
THANK YOU for running into my troubles.


igor.vaynberg wrote:
 
 class bookmarkablepageimglink extends panel {
public bookmarkablepageimglink(string id, class page, string image) {
super(id);
setrenderbodyonly(true);
bookmarkablepagelink link=new bookmarkablepagelink(page);
add(link);
link.add(new staticimage(img, new model(image));
 }
 }
 
 bookmarkablepageimglink.html
 wicket:panel
  #   
 /wicket:panel
 
 then in your code
 
 add(new bookmarkablepageimglink(mylink, mypage.class, foo.gif));
 
 and in html
 
  # my image link 
 
 -igor
 
 
 On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I don't quite understand how panel helps me here...
 I have nested tag and when I try to
 add(new BookmarkablePageLink(awicketid).add(new Image(imgwicketid)))
 I
 get WicketMessage: Unable to find component with id 'imgwicketid' in
 [MarkupContainer [Component id = awicketid ...

 what is wrong here, can you point it out ?

 How can I handle nested tags ?



 igor.vaynberg wrote:
 
  noep, this is not how component oriented frameworks work. in wicket a
  component is attached to a markup tag.
 
  since  #  foo   is two tags then you need two
  components
 
  however, the nice thing about component oriented frameworks is that you
  can
  composite components
 
  so you can make a panel that houses a bookmarkablepagelink and an img
  component, and then its use within your code would be like what you
  described
 
  -igor
 
 
  On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 
  igor.vaynberg wrote:
  
   where would you put the code that changes the src attr?
  
   -igor
  
   it is my question :-)
   I thought of something like:
   add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink,
   MapFindPage.class).componentInternals(img tag full string here));
  
  
   On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
   HTML:
  
   #
   imgs/map_find.gif
  
   Code:
   add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink,
 MapFindPage.class
  ));
  
  
   Now I need to change src of img. Can I do that without boring
   WebMarkupContainer and add(new Image().add(new
  SimpleAttributeModifier())
   in
   constructor of that ?
  
   Wicket 1.2.
   --
   View this message in context:
  
 
 http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-hangle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950328
   Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  
  
  
 
 -
   Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
   Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
  share
   your
   opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
 cash
  
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
  
 
 -
   Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
   Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share
   your
   opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
 cash
  
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
 
  --
  View this message in context:
 
 http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-handle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950433
  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 
 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share
  your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 
 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
  your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 

 --
 View this message in context:
 

Re: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form

2006-12-19 Thread Igor Vaynberg

we dropped it from extensions because there was not enough interest in it
and it was a pita to maintain. if there is interest now then you guys can
feel free to start a wicket-stuff project, once it has evolved there to
something useful we wouldnt mind readding it to extensions.

-igor


On 12/19/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


this is not so difficult to do on a base level in wicket...it just
that i wished the wicket committers could work on a very robust
infastructure for this because really we eventually get tired of
typing textfields for each property in various beans. there used to be
bean panel in wicket but suddenly they dropped it from the extensions.
but i made something similar for a project where i needed dynamic
forms. wait i could even zip up the small sample i used to experiement
this.

just attach to any existing wicket project and use the sample bean

On 12/19/06, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Quite interesting.

 Although Wicket use a different approach that requires explicitly to map
 html fields to java objects - and this is what makes it so great - there
are
 situation where would be very useful to have a component like that (for
 example for fast application prototyping ..).


 Moreover it would be quite easy to implement extending a panel and using
a
 just bit of reflection .


 Wicket gurus what do you think about?


 - Paolo


 On 12/19/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  This look really cool, I just define the bean and the framework
  determine HTML input type for me, is that similar support from wicket
  for this?
 
  http://beanform.sourceforge.net/
 
 
-
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share
  your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 




--
Aladejebi Ayodeji A.,

DabarObjects Solutions
Phone: 234 9 273 2 555
Mobile: +234 803 589 1780
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.dabarobjects.com
Blog: blog.dabarobjects.com

Participate, Collaborate, Innovate
Join Community:
http://www.cowblock.net/

Get A Free Blog:
http://blogs.cowblock.net/


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Can I hangle some html without WebMarkupContainer

2006-12-19 Thread Igor Vaynberg

where would you put the code that changes the src attr?

-igor


On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



HTML:

#
imgs/map_find.gif

Code:
add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink, MapFindPage.class));


Now I need to change src of img. Can I do that without boring
WebMarkupContainer and add(new Image().add(new SimpleAttributeModifier())
in
constructor of that ?

Wicket 1.2.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-hangle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950328
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


[Wicket-user] ListMultipleChoice selected List

2006-12-19 Thread Scott Lusebrink

could someone provide me with code to retrieve the selected options from a
ListMultipleSelect.  I tried looking at isSelected which is protected and
not public for some reason and could not figure out what parameters it
wanted.for the future public List ListMultipleChoice.getSelected();
would be a very useful addition
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


[Wicket-user] Russian community

2006-12-19 Thread Konstantin

Are there russian/ukrainian speaking people here ?
It would be great to form a community if such is not already somewhere there
:-)
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Russian-community-tf2847957.html#a7953639
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Russian community

2006-12-19 Thread Nick Heudecker

It's possible.  Nobody knows what Igor is. :)

On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Are there russian/ukrainian speaking people here ?
It would be great to form a community if such is not already somewhere
there
:-)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Russian-community-tf2847957.html#a7953639
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] AjaxSubmitButton and not adding it to a Form

2006-12-19 Thread Johan Compagner

a button should be in a form (one of its parents)
or a button should get the form through its constructor.

So what goes wrong exactly?
Can you have a small test case?

johan


On 12/18/06, ChuckDeal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



It gets there fine, its this line:

if (submit.getForm() == Form.this

that is the problem.  submit (which is the button) does not belong to a
Form, it is supposed to contain a reference to a Form instead.  SInce it
can't find a Form object for the button it throws an  exception

throw new WicketRuntimeException(Could not find Form parent for  +
this);

Thus killing the execution.

To Igor:
It didn't make a difference when I renamed (wicket:id) the button from
submit to submitButton.

Chuck


Johan Compagner wrote:

 It should work AjaxSubmitButton is a IFormSubmittingComponent component
so
 this code:

 IFormSubmittingComponent submit =
 (IFormSubmittingComponent)getPage().visitChildren(
 IFormSubmittingComponent.class, new IVisitor()
 {
 public Object component(final Component component)
 {
 // Get button
 final IFormSubmittingComponent submit =
 (IFormSubmittingComponent)component;

 // Check for button-name or button-name.xrequest
 string
 if (submit.getForm() == Form.this
  (getRequest().getParameter(
 submit.getInputName()) != null || getRequest()

 .getParameter(submit.getInputName()
 + .x) != null))

 should find the ajax button no matter if it is in the page or not
 (this is 1.3 code but as far as i know this isn't really changed)

 Frank are you reading with us? I believe you worked on this.

 johan


 On 12/13/06, ChuckDeal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I have a Page that has a Form with some select boxes in it and, outside
 the
 Form, I have three buttons (submit[AjaxSubmitButton], reset[AjaxLink],
 cancel[AjaxLink]).

 In Wicket 1.2.3  (Actually, I have been using the latest 1.2-SNAPSHOT
 releases) The submit button works as advertised and submits the page.

 In 1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT (latest as of 13DEC2006 7am EST), the page
 fails
 with the following exception:

 wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Could not find Form parent for
 [MarkupContainer [Component id = submit, page =
 com.csc.aims.issuetracker.wicket.TestSelectionPage, path =
 0:submit.TestSelectionPage$7, isVisible = true, isVersioned = false]]
 at wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.getForm(
 FormComponent.java:409)
 at wicket.markup.html.form.Form$5.component(Form.java:633)
 at wicket.MarkupContainer.visitChildren(MarkupContainer.java
:749)
 at wicket.markup.html.form.Form.findSubmittingButton(Form.java
 :624)
 at wicket.markup.html.form.Form.onFormSubmitted(Form.java:333)
 at
 wicket.ajax.form.AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.onEvent(
 AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.java:87)
 at wicket.ajax.AjaxEventBehavior.respond(AjaxEventBehavior.java
 :165)
 at
 wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.onRequest(
 AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.java:225)
 at


wicket.request.target.component.listener.BehaviorRequestTarget.processEvents
 (BehaviorRequestTarget.java:98)
 at
 wicket.request.compound.DefaultEventProcessorStrategy.processEvents(
 DefaultEventProcessorStrategy.java:64)
 at


wicket.request.compound.AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.processEvents
 (AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.java:56)
 at
 wicket.RequestCycle.doProcessEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java
 :912)
 at wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(
RequestCycle.java
 :950)
 at wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1026)
 at wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1100)
 at wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:454)
 at wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java
:243)
 at wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java
 :122)

 After consulting the Migration Wiki Page
 (http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-13.html) it shows that both
 AjaxSubmitButton and AjaxSubmitLink have changed to extend Button.
 (Actually, I checked AjaxSubmitLink and it does NOT extend
 button...).  But
 according to the javadoc for AjaxSubmitButton, since you pass a form to
 the
 constructor, you don't need to add the component to a Form object.  In
 practice this was not true.  Once I added the button to the form, it
 worked
 as advertised.

 I'm guessing the change was necessary as a result of the hierarchy
change
 of
 AjaxSubmitButton, but maybe the Form arg is no longer needed since you
 must
 add it to the Form object?

 Chuck
 --
 View this message in context:

http://www.nabble.com/AjaxSubmitButton-and-not-adding-it-to-a-Form-tf2815470.html#a7857386
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




Re: [Wicket-user] ListMultipleChoice selected List

2006-12-19 Thread Igor Vaynberg

the selected options will be added to the model object (which is a
collection) after the submit.

-igor


On 12/19/06, Scott Lusebrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


could someone provide me with code to retrieve the selected options from a
ListMultipleSelect.  I tried looking at isSelected which is protected and
not public for some reason and could not figure out what parameters it
wanted.for the future public List ListMultipleChoice.getSelected();
would be a very useful addition

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Russian community

2006-12-19 Thread Igor Vaynberg

until i was 12 i was a ukrainian, now im an american :)

-igor


On 12/19/06, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


It's possible.  Nobody knows what Igor is. :)

On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Are there russian/ukrainian speaking people here ?
 It would be great to form a community if such is not already somewhere
 there
 :-)
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/Russian-community-tf2847957.html#a7953639
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -

 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash

 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] AjaxSubmitButton and not adding it to a Form

2006-12-19 Thread ChuckDeal

The AjaxSubmitButton specifically says that it does NOT have to be attached
to a form; from the javadoc

 * A button that submits the form via ajax. Since this button takes the form
as
 * a constructor argument it does not need to be added to it unlike the
 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Button} component.

However, in practice, this is not the case.  I believe it is associated with
the change (1.2-SNAPSHOT - 1.3-SNAPSHOT) to extend from Button.  

What goes wrong?  The exception says something to the effect of Could not
find Form parent for [the button component] (see the full stacktrace in my
original message way down below); when debugging, it calls the getForm()
method of my button which instead of returning the Form that was supplied to
the Constructor, calls findParent()

As for the test case, I'll see if I can put something together.

Chuck


Johan Compagner wrote:
 
 a button should be in a form (one of its parents)
 or a button should get the form through its constructor.
 
 So what goes wrong exactly?
 Can you have a small test case?
 
 johan
 
 
 On 12/18/06, ChuckDeal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 It gets there fine, its this line:

 if (submit.getForm() == Form.this

 that is the problem.  submit (which is the button) does not belong to a
 Form, it is supposed to contain a reference to a Form instead.  SInce it
 can't find a Form object for the button it throws an  exception

 throw new WicketRuntimeException(Could not find Form parent for  +
 this);

 Thus killing the execution.

 To Igor:
 It didn't make a difference when I renamed (wicket:id) the button from
 submit to submitButton.

 Chuck


 Johan Compagner wrote:
 
  It should work AjaxSubmitButton is a IFormSubmittingComponent component
 so
  this code:
 
  IFormSubmittingComponent submit =
  (IFormSubmittingComponent)getPage().visitChildren(
  IFormSubmittingComponent.class, new IVisitor()
  {
  public Object component(final Component component)
  {
  // Get button
  final IFormSubmittingComponent submit =
  (IFormSubmittingComponent)component;
 
  // Check for button-name or
 button-name.xrequest
  string
  if (submit.getForm() == Form.this
   (getRequest().getParameter(
  submit.getInputName()) != null || getRequest()
 
  .getParameter(submit.getInputName()
  + .x) != null))
 
  should find the ajax button no matter if it is in the page or not
  (this is 1.3 code but as far as i know this isn't really changed)
 
  Frank are you reading with us? I believe you worked on this.
 
  johan
 
 
  On 12/13/06, ChuckDeal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  I have a Page that has a Form with some select boxes in it and,
 outside
  the
  Form, I have three buttons (submit[AjaxSubmitButton], reset[AjaxLink],
  cancel[AjaxLink]).
 
  In Wicket 1.2.3  (Actually, I have been using the latest 1.2-SNAPSHOT
  releases) The submit button works as advertised and submits the page.
 
  In 1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT (latest as of 13DEC2006 7am EST), the page
  fails
  with the following exception:
 
  wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Could not find Form parent for
  [MarkupContainer [Component id = submit, page =
  com.csc.aims.issuetracker.wicket.TestSelectionPage, path =
  0:submit.TestSelectionPage$7, isVisible = true, isVersioned = false]]
  at wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.getForm(
  FormComponent.java:409)
  at wicket.markup.html.form.Form$5.component(Form.java:633)
  at wicket.MarkupContainer.visitChildren(MarkupContainer.java
 :749)
  at wicket.markup.html.form.Form.findSubmittingButton(Form.java
  :624)
  at wicket.markup.html.form.Form.onFormSubmitted(Form.java:333)
  at
  wicket.ajax.form.AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.onEvent(
  AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.java:87)
  at
 wicket.ajax.AjaxEventBehavior.respond(AjaxEventBehavior.java
  :165)
  at
  wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.onRequest(
  AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.java:225)
  at
 
 
 wicket.request.target.component.listener.BehaviorRequestTarget.processEvents
  (BehaviorRequestTarget.java:98)
  at
  wicket.request.compound.DefaultEventProcessorStrategy.processEvents(
  DefaultEventProcessorStrategy.java:64)
  at
 
 
 wicket.request.compound.AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.processEvents
  (AbstractCompoundRequestCycleProcessor.java:56)
  at
  wicket.RequestCycle.doProcessEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java
  :912)
  at wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(
 RequestCycle.java
  :950)
  at wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1026)
  at wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1100)
  at wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:454)
  at wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java
 :243)
  at
 

Re: [Wicket-user] Russian community

2006-12-19 Thread Johan Compagner

On 12/19/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


now im an american :)



that is still to be seen ofcourse.

johan
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Russian community

2006-12-19 Thread Igor Vaynberg

i have a passport that says so :)

-igor


On 12/19/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




On 12/19/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 now im an american :)


that is still to be seen ofcourse.

johan



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Can I hangle some html without WebMarkupContainer

2006-12-19 Thread Konstantin

Panel is too complicated for my needs. Used this:

BookmarkablePageLink bpLink= new
BookmarkablePageLink(wicketbpLinkidhere, MyCustomClassHere.class);
add(bpLink);

bpLink.add(new WebComponent(wicketimgidhere) {
protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag componentTag) {
checkComponentTag(componentTag, img);  is it
excessive here ?
componentTag.put(src,
mycustomresourcefolderintherootofwebapp/myimage.gif);
}
});



igor.vaynberg wrote:
 
 class bookmarkablepageimglink extends panel {
public bookmarkablepageimglink(string id, class page, string image) {
super(id);
setrenderbodyonly(true);
bookmarkablepagelink link=new bookmarkablepagelink(page);
add(link);
link.add(new staticimage(img, new model(image));
 }
 }
 
 bookmarkablepageimglink.html
 wicket:panel
  #   
 /wicket:panel
 
 then in your code
 
 add(new bookmarkablepageimglink(mylink, mypage.class, foo.gif));
 
 and in html
 
  # my image link 
 
 -igor
 
 
 On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I don't quite understand how panel helps me here...
 I have nested tag and when I try to
 add(new BookmarkablePageLink(awicketid).add(new Image(imgwicketid)))
 I
 get WicketMessage: Unable to find component with id 'imgwicketid' in
 [MarkupContainer [Component id = awicketid ...

 what is wrong here, can you point it out ?

 How can I handle nested tags ?



 igor.vaynberg wrote:
 
  noep, this is not how component oriented frameworks work. in wicket a
  component is attached to a markup tag.
 
  since  #  foo   is two tags then you need two
  components
 
  however, the nice thing about component oriented frameworks is that you
  can
  composite components
 
  so you can make a panel that houses a bookmarkablepagelink and an img
  component, and then its use within your code would be like what you
  described
 
  -igor
 
 
  On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 
  igor.vaynberg wrote:
  
   where would you put the code that changes the src attr?
  
   -igor
  
   it is my question :-)
   I thought of something like:
   add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink,
   MapFindPage.class).componentInternals(img tag full string here));
  
  
   On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
   HTML:
  
   #
   imgs/map_find.gif
  
   Code:
   add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink,
 MapFindPage.class
  ));
  
  
   Now I need to change src of img. Can I do that without boring
   WebMarkupContainer and add(new Image().add(new
  SimpleAttributeModifier())
   in
   constructor of that ?
  
   Wicket 1.2.
   --
   View this message in context:
  
 
 http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-hangle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950328
   Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  
  
  
 
 -
   Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
   Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
  share
   your
   opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
 cash
  
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
  
 
 -
   Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
   Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share
   your
   opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
 cash
  
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
 
  --
  View this message in context:
 
 http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-handle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950433
  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 
 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share
  your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 
 -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
  your
  opinions on IT  business topics through 

Re: [Wicket-user] Can I hangle some html without WebMarkupContainer

2006-12-19 Thread Igor Vaynberg

the idea with the panel was that you dont have to repeat the code below for
every time you have a bookmarkable page link with an img inside :)

-igor


On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Panel is too complicated for my needs. Used this:

BookmarkablePageLink bpLink= new
BookmarkablePageLink(wicketbpLinkidhere, MyCustomClassHere.class);
add(bpLink);

bpLink.add(new WebComponent(wicketimgidhere) {
protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag componentTag) {
checkComponentTag(componentTag, img);  is it
excessive here ?
componentTag.put(src,
mycustomresourcefolderintherootofwebapp/myimage.gif);
}
});



igor.vaynberg wrote:

 class bookmarkablepageimglink extends panel {
public bookmarkablepageimglink(string id, class page, string image) {
super(id);
setrenderbodyonly(true);
bookmarkablepagelink link=new bookmarkablepagelink(page);
add(link);
link.add(new staticimage(img, new model(image));
 }
 }

 bookmarkablepageimglink.html
 wicket:panel
  #
 /wicket:panel

 then in your code

 add(new bookmarkablepageimglink(mylink, mypage.class, foo.gif));

 and in html

  # my image link

 -igor


 On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I don't quite understand how panel helps me here...
 I have nested tag and when I try to
 add(new BookmarkablePageLink(awicketid).add(new
Image(imgwicketid)))
 I
 get WicketMessage: Unable to find component with id 'imgwicketid' in
 [MarkupContainer [Component id = awicketid ...

 what is wrong here, can you point it out ?

 How can I handle nested tags ?



 igor.vaynberg wrote:
 
  noep, this is not how component oriented frameworks work. in wicket a
  component is attached to a markup tag.
 
  since  #  foo   is two tags then you need two
  components
 
  however, the nice thing about component oriented frameworks is that
you
  can
  composite components
 
  so you can make a panel that houses a bookmarkablepagelink and an img
  component, and then its use within your code would be like what you
  described
 
  -igor
 
 
  On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 
  igor.vaynberg wrote:
  
   where would you put the code that changes the src attr?
  
   -igor
  
   it is my question :-)
   I thought of something like:
   add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink,
   MapFindPage.class).componentInternals(img tag full string
here));
  
  
   On 12/19/06, Konstantin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
   HTML:
  
   #
   imgs/map_find.gif
  
   Code:
   add(new BookmarkablePageLink(mapFindLink,
 MapFindPage.class
  ));
  
  
   Now I need to change src of img. Can I do that without boring
   WebMarkupContainer and add(new Image().add(new
  SimpleAttributeModifier())
   in
   constructor of that ?
  
   Wicket 1.2.
   --
   View this message in context:
  
 

http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-hangle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950328
   Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  
  
  
 

-
   Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
   Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
  share
   your
   opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
 cash
  
 

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
  
 

-
   Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
   Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share
   your
   opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
 cash
  
 

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
 
  --
  View this message in context:
 

http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-handle-some-html-without-WebMarkupContainer-tf2846969.html#a7950433
  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 

-
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share
  your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn
cash
 

http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 


Re: [Wicket-user] How can I do URL mapping in wicket?

2006-12-19 Thread Carfield Yim
On 12/20/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 working fine over here, make sure your auth strategy really is skipping that
 class

The strangle thing is that even if I remove the auth. logic, It still
forward to

http://192.168.1.79:8080/wicket/app/signup?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:com.xxx.base.Logon

Any possible reason of this? Do I need to have any setup of using
mountBookmarkablePage? The way I use it is just one line of code

mountBookmarkablePage(/signup, Registration.class);

Do I need to do anything else?

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] How can I do URL mapping in wicket?

2006-12-19 Thread Igor Vaynberg

no, you shouldnt, its really funny that it forwards to your logon page, is
that your homepage?

-igor


On 12/19/06, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On 12/20/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 working fine over here, make sure your auth strategy really is skipping
that
 class

The strangle thing is that even if I remove the auth. logic, It still
forward to


http://192.168.1.79:8080/wicket/app/signup?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:com.xxx.base.Logon

Any possible reason of this? Do I need to have any setup of using
mountBookmarkablePage? The way I use it is just one line of code

mountBookmarkablePage(/signup, Registration.class);

Do I need to do anything else?

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] How can I do URL mapping in wicket?

2006-12-19 Thread Carfield Yim
On 12/20/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 no, you shouldnt, its really funny that it forwards to your logon page, is
 that your homepage?

No, my homepage is other class. And eventually I found the solution, If I do

mountBookmarkablePage(/signup, Registration.class);

Then it forward to login page, but

mountBookmarkablePage(/signup/, Registration.class);

Then it work as expected... I guess wicket is looking for a url
directory like http://localhost:8080/wicket/app/signup/ ??

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user