wicket:container is available for 2.x.
Juergen
On 2/14/07, Rüdiger Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonathan Locke schrieb:
[X] Delete this unimportant and generally unsupported feature
[ ] Keep wicket:component, but define its limits, document it on the wiki
as fully supported and
Hi Igor,
The processing of the submitted data is handled in the same way, but
the following page navigation must be different. If in a standard
request, I'll need to setResponsePage() to the next page, but an AJAX
request will just want to ModalWindow.close(). Error handling is also
going to
A really low guess would be that the web container does not handle the url
encoding but it still manages to work some places because of some browser
encoding.
We also saw the problem you had, if user pressed the back button of the
browser(IE6 only). Later we discovered that IE 6 does not
Oops, sorry. I am the author of webby and webby4db. As my daytime job is
not related too much to wicket and webby, I am not too actively reading
this mailing list either.
Thanks for the positive feedback btw.
Please have a look at my latest blog post
(http://r8fe.net/wordpress/?p=13) to see
My guess would be that AjaxCompleteTextField doesn't use POST to send
the entered string to server, it uses get instead. Which means that the
string is part of URL.
-Matej
Flemming Boller wrote:
Hi
I just wanted to share a little trick with you guys who might also be
struggling with
Hi Frank
Hows it going along? Could you define some time?:)
Thanks..
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Bille
Sent: 14. februar 2007 12:29
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Testing Wicket
Yeah, I've been using the long session support that Nathan has been working
on in DataBinder. I had been having real problems using ModalWindows and
Ajax events on the page because the Session was tied to a specific thread
(physical page) and in some cases (like ModalWindow that uses a Page)
You are right Matej.
Also the in javascript I can see that the url encoding only takes place when
NOT using MSIE..
I have no idea why, but I will try and see if I can somehow change the
javascript so autocomplete worx
wihout changing tomcat server.xml.
/Flemming
On 2/15/07, Matej Knopp
Hmm as someone earlier stated. I too seem to have problems with the pages where
wicket appends something like : wicket:interface=:18:: to the url. Now this
is strange since we have had this working earlier. Im running wicket 1.2.4,
fixing it the the cookie manager does not help. Any tips on
Ahh found the problem!!!
I didnt close my browser between Jmeter recordings. So wicket of course
incremented the interface:xx: each time, because it was the same session. When
a new user the comes and asks for the same page it of course aren't there...
hmm I really guess we should write a
Johan Compagner wrote:
post the problems here, i will try to fix them asap.
johan
Wicket 1.3 (revision 507915)
08:24:05,419 ERROR Objects:1053 - Error serializing object class
com.csc.aims.specchange.wicket.SpecChangePage [object=[Page class =
Sorry. Some time means today or tomorrow. (hopefully)
Frank
On 2/15/07, Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank
Hows it going along? Could you define some time?:)
Thanks..
--
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Frank
I was trying to use the datetime.DateTextField and it was giving me a little
grief when I was trying to use DateTime objects with it. It was my
understanding that that datetime project was to be built around the joda
package. Here is a patch the removes the java.util.Date stuff in an
attempt to
I suppose it is worth noting that upon Eelco's suggestion, I now have the
following lines in my Application.init()
//Objects.setObjectStreamFactory(new WicketObjectStreamFactory()); //
custom
serialization
Objects.setObjectStreamFactory(null); // jdk
ahh I guess that is a proxy class that by itself is not serializeable but we
need to handle those i guess specially .
will check it out
johan
On 2/15/07, ChuckDeal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose it is worth noting that upon Eelco's suggestion, I now have the
following lines in my
Hello Sazib,
* faesha has sent you a new private message.
/go/admin/notifications/action=forwardm=1id=n4364497
faesha wrote:
would u care to chat?br /
br /
Regards,
Have fun on Facebox!
The Facebox Team
You received
From my perspective, what would be most useful would be some documentation
beyond the auth-roles example regarding implementing custom authentication
and authorization schemes. Now that I have some experience, perhaps I'll
take a stab at that myself, however I'm still completely new to Wicket,
Hello Sazib,
You just asked to send you the password of your Facebox account. Here are your
details:
Nickname: Sazib
Password: dummypass
Have fun on Facebox!
The Facebox Team
Keep this password safe and don't
Hello Sazib,
You just asked to send you the password of your Facebox account. Here are your
details:
Nickname: Sazib
Password: dummypass
Have fun on Facebox!
The Facebox Team
Keep this password safe and don't
I have a form on my page, and I would like to display a usage hint to the
user when they enter the field, and remove it when they exit the field.
This isn't validating behavior, just some rich interaction. As best I can
tell, the correct thing to do would be:
i) Create two
yes there is a better way. you should handle it inside the button's onsubmit
not inside the form's onsubmit.
that way:
add(new Button() { onsubmit() { setresponsepage(..) isvisible(){...}});
add(new AjaxSubmitButton(onsubmit(target) { window.close(target); }
onerror(){...} isvisible() {..} }
i think the best thing to do is to use javascript for this rather then an
ajax trip back to the server. i have done this exact thing in the past with
mootools and it worked out very nicely.
check out mootools and their tooltips class. what i did was copy and paste
and rename that class, change
ChuckDeal wrote:
I, as I'm sure Nathan would, welcome new ideas or approaches to that
problem.
Yep. But I don't think we can get around serializing the Hibernate
session; even if it's stored directly in the Web session we have to
assume that it could be serialized. And we found that keeping
Johan Compagner wrote:
and i am completely not suprised that ehcache was not performing better.
How could it do that?? Where should the gain come from?
The current impl really grows directly with the hardware you have.
ehcache need to be tweaked exactly
what your system can handle. What do
I've already replaced that implementation. I can paste here one from my
local history. Beware, this might not be the right version and I don't
know ehcache very well, I'm pretty sure there are ways to do this better.
Of course i've played with the cache configuration, this is probably not
You don't need to use the same object to factor out that code. Instead
of passing the same form object between pages, you could have a base
form class that adds the components you want, with a subclass for the
modal window. Sometimes it's handy to have methods like
protected Component
Hallo,
I have this web-flow sequences (two branches to the same leaf):
[web-flow 1] WebPage1 WebPage2 [+Applet] WebPage3
[web-flow 2] WebPage1B [+Applet] WebPage2 [+Applet] WebPage3
The Applet is the same in all cases: is an Applet that digitally signs
(windows keystore for certs) and
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/repeater/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=Awicket.examples.repeater.DataTablePage
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/repeater/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=Awicket.examples.repeater.DataTablePage
-igor
Thanks for the link. But it does not work right
The link got screwed up. It should be:
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/repeater/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.repeater.DataTablePage
Eelco
On 2/15/07, Ingo Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
BTW, wicket serialization is still the default (Eelco had thought that JDK
was the default as of revision 507700)
I just found that out as well. And commited the change so that it is
not the default anymore. Committers: please do not make this the
default mechanism until we have had a vote
And thanks Wicket guys for looking in to this; I know that what we're
doing is a little out there, but as Chuck said there are some pretty
compelling uses for it, mostly in the class of ajax operations you want
to perform tentatively, and commit later. Down the line I don't think
this
On 2/15/07, Matt Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From my perspective, what would be most useful would be some documentation
beyond the auth-roles example regarding implementing custom authentication
and authorization schemes. Now that I have some experience, perhaps I'll
take a stab at that
On 2/15/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why is it dangerous? i hope that if you disconnect the session it doesnt
hold a ref to sessionfactory anymore. session itself is pretty light - just
a cache of loaded entities, it is the session factory that is a pretty heavy
object you dont
I am trying to create FeedbackPanel within each ListView component. The
problem is how the visibility is handled... from what I understand, the
order of events occurs like this:
updateFeedback is called on my FeedbackPanel
ListView re-creates all of my components, thus ignoring the visiblity
but those cached entities are the key :) because hib has to guarantee
instance identity within the session scope - that cache is what makes the
long-session pattern possible :)
-igor
On 2/15/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/15/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why
you shouldnt be calling setresponsepage inside constructors
try RestartResponseException
-igor
On 2/15/07, Manu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
I have this web-flow sequences (two branches to the same leaf):
[web-flow 1] WebPage1 WebPage2 [+Applet] WebPage3
[web-flow 2] WebPage1B
On 2/15/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but those cached entities are the key :) because hib has to guarantee
instance identity within the session scope - that cache is what makes the
long-session pattern possible :)
Sure, sure, it's all sane. However, you are probably the last
A have created a very very basic page for Wicket and JMeter and attached the
old test application I found. You are welcome to extend the page :)
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Wicket+and+JMeter
Frank
On 2/15/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry. Some time means
Could I use Wicket to build a WAP site, or is it exclusively for HTML?
--Jesse Barnum, President, 360Works
http://www.360works.com
(770) 234-9293
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's
After 2 months of working with Wicket we almost felt like profies but now
that we have to [loosely] integrate some pieces written by others we've got
into one of those Wicket gotchas again...
So, there is a simple home page with a simple javascript created by others,
which we host inside our
thats just stupid
IT IS IN SVN ONLY!!
so now it will never be finished, never be tested
i will stop working on it for now then
johan
On 2/15/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, wicket serialization is still the default (Eelco had thought that
JDK
was the default as of
and wicket caching does exactly that (if we started caching byte[] now
instead of the pages that isn't very usefull at the moment)
What it does, it tries to cache as much as possible as long as the jvm can
handle
No default predefined size that is different for every kind of system you
deploy
Where is the serialization part?
I just see that you cache the page instance and nothing more.
Thats a bit wrong. Because the SessionPageKey stores a version number
But the page instance increments that version number everytime. So you can't
assume
that getPage() will return the one with the
i dont see why not. wicket's core is not tied to xml not html - it is
basically a glorified templating engine. you might have to build your own
components for ones that are different between html and wap.
-igor
On 2/15/07, Jesse Barnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could I use Wicket to build a
what happens if there is an error? how does wicket redirect back to that
page? how is that back url generated?
-igor
On 2/15/07, beboris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After 2 months of working with Wicket we almost felt like profies but
now
that we have to [loosely] integrate some pieces
On 2/15/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thats just stupid
IT IS IN SVN ONLY!!
And automatically snapshots.
so now it will never be finished, never be tested
We provide snapshots for people to use. We don't provide, say, stable
builds or something similar. In fact we haven't
snapshots or work directly from CVS.
SVN of course
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through
We have a central WebPage, which is not supposed to be versioned.
So, we call setVersioned(false) in all constructors for that WebPage, and
Wicket, indeed, has only one version for that page, version number 1.
However, it looks like somehow there is a logic inside the framework, which
is not
Hi all,
We're (Johan mostly) are experimenting with custom serialization to
see whether we could speed things up a bit (which doesn't mean what we
have now is bad btw).
For anyone working on 1.3: we could use your help testing that
feature. The only thing you need to do is turn it on on your
best thing to do is to replicate it in a quickstart
-igor
On 2/15/07, beboris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a central WebPage, which is not supposed to be versioned.
So, we call setVersioned(false) in all constructors for that WebPage, and
Wicket, indeed, has only one version for that
Nothing happens. We stay on the same HomePage and display an error.
Unfortunately, Wicket changes URL of the page though, so relative links stop
working... (see a code snippet below, please)
-bob
HomePage extends WebPage
...
LoginForm form = new Form() {
...
@Override
public void onSubmit()
mount the page using querystringcodingstrategy that way the link will be
/index.html?wicket:pagemap...
-igor
On 2/15/07, beboris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nothing happens. We stay on the same HomePage and display an error.
Unfortunately, Wicket changes URL of the page though, so relative
On 2/16/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you shouldnt be calling setresponsepage inside constructors
try RestartResponseException
-igor
Other than setresponsepage(), there are also methods like
getMarkupId() , which are not work properly in constructor. May be we
can add flag for
On 2/14/07, Scott Lusebrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would a WebResource not lock the rest of the application?
Not if it is defined as a shared resource. If it is component bound -
like Images use resources - it is.
Ajax is not a
possibility due to security requirements. This page is already
i think i need some kind of html parser that will allow for replacement of
certain parts of the html markup
the goal is something like:
1) find all tags that have have a reference to some external resource
attribute like img or link (even ones without a wicket tag)
examples:
foo1/bar/val
link
Hi,
I have the following code
code
Roles r = new Roles();
boolean hasAny = r.hasAnyRole( null );
/code
Shouldn't this returned [true] as r doesn't have any roles?
If [true] should be the correct value
The following changes is needed.
code
public boolean hasAnyRole(Roles roles)
{
if
56 matches
Mail list logo
