roach used
>
> With the link the invalidation of the session and the creating of the
> "logout" page are switched so the page is in the pagemap when wicket tries
> to process it.
>
> -Igor
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
Or put all the energy we have into getting all the rough edges out of
Wicket/ make it really great, and then start making noise again :)
Eelco
On 8/25/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.theserverside.com/articles/article.tss?l=JSFTapestry
>
> Maybe someone would like t
ApplicationSettings.configure("deployment"); / not calling
ApplicationSettings.setResourcePollFrequency should do the trick.
Putting:
deployment
true
In your web.xml (and not overriding it in your application should work too.
Or... - I hope this is not the case - do we forget to release
resources anywhere else?
Eelco
On 8/25/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ApplicationSettings.configure("deployment"); / not calling
> ApplicationSettings.setResourcePollFrequency should d
But... in case it is Wicket's failt, it should be fixed.
Eelco
On 8/25/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have said this before on the list.
> You really should look for an integrated solution for this in a IDE
> For example use the Tomcat plugin or the Jetty Launcher in eclipse
Did turning off resource polling solve your problem?
Eelco
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Mana
That sucks. I didn't follow the discussion when it went two weeks ago,
but it seems like this isn't fixed yet right? Is it filed as a bug?
Eelco
On 8/25/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This isnt just a development-time problem. This also happens when you are
> deploying a new versi
Ok, so... we've identified we have a problem. Any idea's what it might
be? Johan?
Eelco
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & P
So... do we have an issue for this in the issue DB then? Juergen, is
that hard to fix?
Eelco
On 8/26/05, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Agreed. We should not fail silently. Furthermore just because sometimes
> previews as a no-op does not mean it should not render at runtime when
>
I have no experience with Cayenne, but some readers (Jonathan C) have.
>From what I understand, Cayenne works with static code generation.
I have experience with OJB. I'm not too crazy about it to put it
mildly, though I have been working with pre-1.0 versions.
Maybe if you want more control, you
Or just set autolinking off. Personally, I think that would be a
better default, as it is pretty common to be able to have such a link
as kind of a refresh. If you look at most public sites (Google,
Flickr, Yahoo) etc, they all have them just enabled.
Eelco
On 8/25/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTE
No, user list is fine too. I haven't found the time to look at it yet.
Could you give us a bit more code?
Eelco
On 8/26/05, Johannes Fahrenkrug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should I maybe post this again on the developers list?
>
> - Johannes
>
> Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > th
t; content & time - basically a cut-down combination of parts of the
> cd-app & table examples, although even that 'needs' contrib-data,
> contrib-data-hibernate-3.0 & contrib-dataview support! I'm toying
> with the idea of uploading it, but wondering if it&#
thing...e.g.
Home
Mortgages
Loans
Credit Cards
Home
Mortgages
Loans
Credit Cards
Anyway, I'm slightly dubious about defaulting it to off.../Gwyn
On 26/08/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:> Or just set autolinking off. Personally, I think that would be a> better
No! A page is a specific instance of one user. What would you accomplish?
Eelco
On 8/26/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you can build it pretty easy.
> Just extend WebSession and hold a map with pages you like to pool.
>
>
> Christian Essl wrote:
> > I was just following the di
I just read a few chapters of Bitter EJB. A large part of the book is
about how to avoid state. Allthough stateless session beans were not
designed to be that important, they now play a central role in J2EE.
The consequence is that large parts of the J2EE community got back to
procedural programmin
It seems we have brought out a totally broken build. Applaus to
ourselves. Did /anyone/ actually test the recent changes at all?
Feedback doesn't work /at all/ it seems (at least not with head, but I
tried 1.1b3 too).
We need to get out a new build this weekend. One that works. One that
is tested.
So:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: No Page found for component
[MarkupContainer [Component id = messages, page = , path =
messages.FeedbackPanel$MessageListView]]
Is just in HEAD then? I sure do hope so...
Eelco
---
SF.Net email is Sponsore
Confirmed. Sorry about the bitter remark. 1.1b3 is fine. The problem
is related to the latest change in Component.
Eelco
On 8/26/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So:
>
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: No Page found for component
> [MarkupContainer [Compo
I'm looking into it.
Eelco
On 8/26/05, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody have any thoughts about my DatePicker issue?
>
>
> ---
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> September 19-22, 2005 * S
Actually, it's both. It's on DateFormat, as that is what we use in
Wicket. However DateFormat uses an instance of Calendar:
public void setLenient(boolean lenient)
{
calendar.setLenient(lenient);
}
:)
Sorry, couldn't resist being a smart ass.
Eelco
Actually we found the problem yesterday when chatting on IRC. Philip
created a lot (more than 10) page instances in his page to use with
links later on. The problem with Wicket is, that the pages are/ were
registered with the session in the page constructor. Thus, more than
10 means the current is
Yep, that should work out of the box with any link. Just attach your
link component to your DIV (or any other HTML tag).
Eelco
On 8/28/05, leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some links on DIV tags. Is it possible to open a wicket page
> (trigerring a PageLink) with a javascript
> on
You can use them for behavioural tests too. E.g. checking that a
certain link handler is executed etc.
The mock objects provide you with a minimal simulated web application
enivornment. That's the least you need for your tests to be usefull.
You usually want to test rendering results, as that is t
If you have concrete examples of how you would like your (Form) tests
to work/ look, please tell us or open a feature request for it.
Eelco
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Franc
Is anyone using Rico and Wicket as it is delivered with wicket's ajax
implementation? If not, I want to remove it - afaik it doesn't work,
and I see no easy way of getting it to work either (see comments in
implementation). That leaves us with Dojo as our default, and I'd like
to integrate scriptac
That depends. I started working on one of them some time ago, but
stopped as I didn't have enough time. Basic use can added easily, but
just as with DatePicker, to make it really good it'll take some
effort. More specifically, you want your component to disclose all or
most of the flexibility of th
Lots of times you just want to mutate the tag, like for http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
You should call error on your target component, or e.g. on your page.
Depends on how your messages are filtered, though I lost track of the
latest feedback changes. But validators normally set the messages on
the component they are attached to, so setting them manually should
have the same effect.
:)
On 8/29/05, Johannes Fahrenkrug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> . nevermind. It's not the feedbackPanel that didn't work, it's
> Eclipse's hot code replacement (or my brain, whichever)
>
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software
It's not on that list (yet), but all lists are listed here:
https://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=119783
Eelco
On 8/29/05, Jon Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't your new mailing list supposed to be listed here?:
> http://wicket.sourceforge.net/mail-lists.html
>
> Just wondering how to
.add(new
> > TypeValidator(Date.class, new Locale("de", "DE";
> >}
> > });
> > }
> >
> ***
>
> >
> >
> > and I attached the Te
Indeed, not all Wicket web-request are/ will be servlet based. We need
a different structure for portlet requests.
Eelco
On 8/30/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eelco can explain it better i think but this is a refactor for portlets
> support.
> And if you want to really slim wi
Yep, we still have to get the details right, but we have been offered
to talk at JavaPolis. Martijn will be there for sure, I might be on
the other side of the world by then.
Eelco
On 8/30/05, Per Ejeklint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wondering,
>
> are there any plans for a Wicket present
gt; Johan Compagner wrote:
> > when is it exactly?
> > I think if i don't have anything else at that day, i will go with
> > martijn.
> >
> > johan
> >
> >
> > Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> >> Yep, we still have to get the details right, but
It think that would make everything much more difficult to understand.
The alternative is that you pull the sections out to panels, and use
the markup inheritance in each panel. I don't know if markup
inheritence allready works for Panels, but that would be the way to do
stuff like this imo.
Eelco
We found what it is. Quite logical actually.
By default, optimizeItemRemoval is set to false, which means that
ListView replaces all child components by new instances. The idea
behind this, is that you allways render the fresh data, and as people
usually use ListViews for displaying read-only list
Your problem probably is that you call createApplicationSettings,
which actually is a method for internal use (I'll update the javadocs
right away). You should use getSettings, so you'll get the settings
that are created for you, and that will actually be used by Wicket.
Furthermore, you don't nee
Good news! And again Juergen, you're working faster than I notice :)
Eelco
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven De
Pretty cool too! Any plans for promoting Wicket as a side effect? :)
Eelco
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven De
Call setEscapeModelStrings(false) on your label.
Eelco
On 8/31/05, pepone pepone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> what i trying to do is display the content of a textarea this textarea
> can include basic html tags for text formating, i want to display the
> document in a label component
I noticed this too. I think it is a bug.
Eelco
On 8/31/05, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Furthermore, from a previewability point of view this makes no sense.
>
> Currently I defined both in the child and parent page. Now I
> get two tags at runtime in my rendered page,
That's strange?!
The line that fails:
final String key = scope.getPackage().getName() + '/' +
SharedResources.path(path, locale, style);
So, either scope is null, or package is null. In this case, the scope
is certainly not null, so scope.getPackage() must return null. That's
weird. Anyone knows
Yeah, that's the problem here.
I had a problem last week where I forgot to put the * in the path.
Took me about an hour before I figured out that was the problem. It
would be great if we could somehow detect this early on, and - when we
detect it - either start loggin tons of warnings, or fail rig
Scope can't be null from that initializer. The treeinitializer passes
Tree.class.
Eelco
On 9/1/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no this can't happen.
> it looks like it happens on this line:
>
> final String key = scope.getPackage().getName() + '/' +
> SharedResources.path(path,
That would be a very nice component to have in extensions. So if you
make it really nice... I think an API like DatePicker works for a
component like this. The 'problem' is that components like these are
very configurable. You don't want to loose too much of this
flexibility, but you have to choose
Yeah, it does now (from 1.1). Maybe Martijn didn't use Tree or
DatePicker yet, or was not aware that these component load resources
from the jars.
Any idea how the package might be null Timothy? Tree is not in the
default package, so it shouldn't be. It must be classloader thing.
Eelco
> Doesn'
It would be easier, and more the Wicket way - not to change your
components, but to acchieve the same through the way you use models.
Changing the component hierarchy in your page should not happen that
often, as that would usually be done with a new page (e.g. editing an
address instead of a custo
That code is fine, as it shouldn't render a page, but just stream the resoure.
Did you put '/*' in your web.xml (not just '*') ?
Eelco
On 9/1/05, Jim McBeath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried adding the "*" to my web.xml file, that didn't make any
> difference. I ran a debugger on the wicke
Yeah, I don't know. I allways hated the licencing stuff. Wish there
were just two licences. However, we allready depend on some LGPL
licences and I have seen a lot of other Apache 2 style projects do
that too. I can't imagine this becomming an actual problem. But if
someone would be so kind to expl
I just tested it, and everything works fine here. Here's the patch of
what I tried on wicket-examples.
I think your problems is somewhere else. Could you give us some more
information?
Eelco
Index: src/java/wicket/examples/helloworld/HelloWorld.html
Jonathan introduced the Apache 2.0 licence from the start of the
(public) project.
Eelco
On 9/2/05, Jonathan Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally, I don't see what the hundreds of words in the Apache 2.0 license
> buys Wicket. Maybe someone can explain.
ly from the ASF itself
> >>> and not purely based on
> >>> the ASL 2.0 license of Wicket (it *is* allowed to bind to LGPL if you
> >>> want), many companies
> >>> won't allow using the Wicket extensions anymore because they don't
> &g
I'll take a look at some of the things you propose later today.
A few notes:
1) I chose not to let ajax be components as that wouldn't be as
flexible (you can now attach 0..n handlers to one component) and it
would certainly mean having a lot of new components. A good example of
this is the - not
eModifiers,
> which is indeed better. Sorry for the beginner mistakes.
>
> What remains is than the url thing. Is there also something I overlooked?
>
> Thanks,
> Christian
>
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2005 16:14:25 +0200, Eelco Hillenius
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
&
What kind of exception do you get?
Eelco
On 9/4/05, pepone pepone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all
>
>
> I have a page that display a TreeView component when you click a node
> the node selected is displayet in other label this sems to work well
>
> my problem is that if i open a tree v
Smart! So you got around the problem of not being able yet to render
just one component by just rendering a whole page.
It is something Juergen is working on (he created a branch for it).
When that works, we could just render components directly, switch it
on/ off etc.
Why not use IModels instead
ssages
>
> On 9/4/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What kind of exception do you get?
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
> > On 9/4/05, pepone pepone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello all
> > >
> > >
> >
I think Juergen means he would like you to check whether they are
fixed in HEAD now, correct?
Eelco
On 9/5/05, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, I reviewed the open RFEs and bug reports and I think they still
> make sense. I believe all the filed bugs are still valid. The only on
I made getInput non-final, as this seems a reasonable flexibility to want.
I'n not sure whether it is a good default to work with names without
ids. I looks like a good idea as it supports the autocomplete feature
you want, and there isn't anything we actually do with the page id.
Can anyone think
I prefer to work with pages. With this approach, you can still reuse
panels ofcourse. But my experience is that allthough it is nice to
have your pages componentized to the max by breaking it up in smaller,
possibly reusable parts, it is also easy to loose track. I like to
work with pages as I can
There are a couple of people on this list that use OSGi & Wicket. They
seem to have missed this thread. At least one of them is a committer
on Oscar, so you might ask around over there what they think is the
best pattern for using Wicket & OSGi. I don't know much about this
myself.
Eelco
On 9/5
reating urls (like onChange of
> Radio Choice)
> And then we do need the id else we can't get the page.
>
> So tag.put("name", getPathWithoutPageId());
> and then getInput():
> return getRequest().getParameter(getPathWithoutPageId());
>
>
>
>
>
Yeah, I can see that working with a page has advantages too. Another
reason to want to have pages that are not put in the session in some
future. I think you'll hit problems once you do more than 10 ajax
roundtrips.
Eelco
> If there is a way to use just a panel instead of an entire page, I
> wou
Ah, yes :)
Do you want to start a vote as a new message? It seems that votes are
only picked up by people when there is a large VOTE: in the subject.
Eelco
On 9/6/05, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > Yep. We could just strip the first nbr + &#
; i will make it so that it goes until the form.. Thet it is unique.. and
> hopefully not that big.
> And i don't make that method final (getInputName()). So that users can
> override it so they can generate
> there own names in a form if they want that (if they know that getId()
>
we don't need the rest
> > we only need from the form (not included) to the component.
> >
> > And if people are sure that id is also unique (what i know with servoy)
> > then we can just
> > put the id in it.
> >
> > Because now the names are to long.
More nitpicking... I still think 'immediate' was a better name. I
don't recall voting for the name change.
Eelco
On 9/6/05, Jan Bares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did not looked into the sources. You are right, but javadoc is wrong:
> "Sets the defaultFormProcessing property. When true (defaul
s doing.
> I don't know any reason why we should change the name again...
>
> Cu,
> Dave
>
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> >More nitpicking... I still think 'immediate' was a better name. I
> >don't recall voting for the name change.
> >
>
Versioning should work out-of-the-box and roll back changes. A lot of
times this is not what you want though. Your best option then is to
turn off versioning, by overriding method isVersioned and let it
return false (e.g. on your Page). This additionally has the effect
that your url won't change, s
I've been thinking about the whole versioning thing longer actually:
wouldn't it be a better (certainly more efficient) default to turn it
off? If you really want the rollback behaviour, you can easily turn it
on.
Eelco
On 9/6/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
n front of me before i did go back)
>
> I think default on is better. Only we have to have a invalidate on the
> page so that is
> immediately expired (then you shouldn't redirect to that same page
> ofcourse because then it is added back)
>
> johan
>
>
&g
Yep. Which is the case with form submissions :)
Eelco
On 9/6/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as long as it is the same page...
>
>
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > The nice thing - which we didn't have in the past - of turning it off,
> > is
Ok, ok, you win :)
Eelco
On 9/6/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> doesn't have to.
> What is the redirect page after you submit a form?
> That can be another page. Then the back button is used to go back
>
>
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> &g
I've had that with a bunch of Struts/ Maverick apps too. That's really
Tomcat in fault imo.
Eelco
> A minor problem is that after some reloading of the web app Tomcat
> goes out of memory...
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software
Yeah, as a matter of fact there is... It was contributed by Igor
Vaynberg and lives in Wicket Stuff as wicket-contrib-palette. CVS only
at this time.
I was thinking, if some people would like to review it, and Igor
agrees, we could move it to wicket-extensions. Looks like a good place
for it.
Eel
Use a bookmarkable page link. If you want to keep you tree, while
loading a complete page, you could best work with (i)frames.
Eelco
On 9/7/05, pepone pepone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello i wan to create a new BookMarkablePage when a user clikc on a
> treeViewItem but i have not idea of how
Isn't your second model derivable? If so, just create and set the
model just in time/ when you do the navigation or panel replacement.
Eelco
On 9/7/05, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to provide the user with the option of selecting the next screen they
> go to after a form i
Agreed. Could you open a bug for this please?
Eelco
On 9/8/05, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I don't know if this has been discussed yet. Using PageParameters and
> BookmarkablePageLinks I just found a strange feature. If there is null
> in PageParameters for argument foo, the
I'd like to help out sometime. Unfortunately too bussy with other
stuff (like the Wicket core project;))
And please let us know if you find anything we can do in Wicket to
make your life as a plugin writer easier.
Eelco
On 9/8/05, Joni Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-08 at
Would be nice to put links you your projects on the site.
Eelco
On 9/8/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to help out sometime. Unfortunately too bussy with other
> stuff (like the Wicket core project;))
>
> And please let us know if you find anyth
I can see that's a valid use case. The danger - probably what Juergen
means - is that the runtime code will differ from the design code,
while it is one of Wicket's goals to keep things clean and consistent.
Otoh however, it /is/ quite powerful to be able to change the actual
tag programatically. I
The Include tag is very raw indeed. Ideally it would be more like
Sitemesh (but without the XML configuration and without it being a
filter) in that it actually parses what it recieves, and tries to
clean up/ merge/ etc. There's a big note about this in the comments.
It's something I'd like to bui
Yeah, that's a good solution. Another clean solution is to use the
decorator pattern.
class Foo {
private String bar;
public void setBar(String bar) { this.bar = bar; };
public String getBar() { return bar; }
}
class Wrapper {
private final Foo foo;
private String formProperty;
public
he acessors, but that might just be that I've not
> understood the question...
>
> /Gwyn
>
> On 09/09/05, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't follow you here. Can you provide some pseudocode?
> >
> >
> > On 9/7/05, Eelco Hillenius <
The plan is to release tomorrow.
Eelco
On 9/10/05, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Glad it helps - I'm afraid that I can't easily investigate the details
> though, as Johan just found & fixed it (in CVS) and I've updated to
> that to check it was fixed for me, which it is.
> If I'm loo
I'd like to say a big thanks to all the people that have been testing
with us: THANK YOU! It really helps to have you guys watching and
testing and sending in patches.
Eelco
On 9/11/05, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The first release candidate for Wicket 1.1 is available f
; > Joni:
> >
> > Do you think your plugin could be ported to IDEA? I'm not an Eclipse
> > user.
> >
> > On 9/8/05, Joni Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That would be good.
> >
> > --
> >
Not yet. Currently Wicket insists on creating session object. We want
to take a look at this for 1.2, but that will take a couple of months
probably.
Eelco
On 9/12/05, Eric Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can Wicket be used for stateless web applications? (Or does it insist on
> creating sessi
You could easily do it without Wicket, but otoh, it is nice to have
all your stuff together. The JasperReports integration I'm working on
is based on resources, and lets you create links to reports (so you'll
get a download dialog or a PDF in the full browser) or embed them in
your page using frame
That's what Google is for, people like us with bad memory :).
The latter approach is similar to the one in cdapp. We definitively
need to give that package more visibility when we release the
wicket-stuff projects next week, even though not everyone agrees with
the way Hibernate is used.
Eelco
Yep, what error do you get?
Eelco
On 9/13/05, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no. Providing the markup and java code however might help looking into it.
>
> juergen
>
> On 9/12/05, Justin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone know what would cause me to get errors about
Usually, you want the disable attribute to not show up at when the tag
is /not/ disabled. You can do this by not putting the attribute in
your markup (),
provide the second AttributeModifier argument 'true' (so attributes
will be added when they do not exist yet), and - important - let your
replace
> It is great if API provides a convenient method like setDisabled(boolean)
> for all form components
> instead of creating 3 object likes new AttributeModifier("disable", true,
> new Model("disable")))
Please open an RFE for it. That way we can track and not forget what you want.
Eelco
-
1) Depends on what objects you mean. Components? Models?
2) Unlike some other frameworks, form processing is not a central
thing in Wicket. With that I mean that the normal cycle doesn't do
anything special for forms; the form behaviour is fully encapsulated
in the Form class and handler interface
t allows the user to define the report criteria. Either should
> work with what you have.
>
>
> On 9/13/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > You could easily do it without Wicket, but otoh, it is nice to have
> > all your stuff together. The Ja
I'm not sure I understand what you want to do.
Maybe to get this clear: what/ how would you do this if it was a Swing
application?
Eelco
On 13 Sep 2005 15:47:00 +0200, Voors Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Wicket Users,
>
> After examining the documentation and examples for some time,
You can easily use setResponsePage or use Panels.
Eelco
On 13 Sep 2005 15:47:00 +0200, Voors Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Wicket Users,
>
> After examining the documentation and examples for some time, i am missing
> one aspect in Wicket. That is a 'Central Controller'. Let me explai
Yep. Either that, or - if you don't want to use pages you can use
panels, and replace one for the other. Or if you think replacing is
too expensive (everything that is replaced is serialized and saved in
order to support the back button by default), place all panels you
want and switch the visible
In the end, (Bound)CompoundPropertyModels are IModels. IModel just has
get/setObject, where you can implement anything you want, including
object creation etc.
CompoundPropertyModels are meant to make your life easier in the sense
that you need less code to acchieve model/property binding. The bas
101 - 200 of 3568 matches
Mail list logo
