are rendered.
How can I (if there is a way) move the page to the front of session
pages (so that other pages would expire sooner)?
Recreating master page using BookmarkableLink is not a solution, since I
need the master page remember it's state.
Thanks
-Matej Knopp
collections framework IMO. Check it out!
Good luck,
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi
I know it's been discussed here already, but still I coudln't find a
solution.
The problem is that I've a detail page from which I want to have link
to master page.
The link is done like this:
add (new PageLink
Hi.
I'm getting a page expired error and I don't know why. I'm using wicket
RC2. Every page expires on 10th reload. This only happens with internet
explorer. Mozilla and Opera can reload the page as many times as needed
with no problems.
No other pages are created or reloaded, but the page
I think the point is not to reload entire page, just the part that has
changed. IMHO a better solution than IFRAMEs would be to use AJAX,
although it will take a while until wicket supports AJAX (1.1 I guess?)
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Just for my understanding why would you actually want
Hmm.. It seems that disabled back button works only in Firefox/Mozzila
and Internet Explorer. In opera the back button works even when the URL
is the same.
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi,
I've developed a servlet filter that hides the real URL from the user.
The real url is stored in the session
to disable the backbutton.
The back button is a fact of live. It is what the users are used to what
the know.
if i go from a list page to a detailpage i want to be able to use the
back button to go back to the listpage.
johan
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED
?
Christopher L Merrill wrote:
Matej Knopp wrote:
In such application, in every detailpage there should be a link to
masterpage, that properly updates the masterpage and IMHO user should
only get there this way.
Can't you accomplish the same thing using the Cache-control or
Expires HTTP
Norbert Sándor wrote:
Hi,
Hi
Someone please help to understand the basics :)
As I see, a new instance of a page is created for each request.
So how and where can I store the state of the page?
The instance of a page is created only once. Then it's stored in pagemap.
It's not recreated on
Hi.
I've read the article and I agree but I think maybe there should be
mentioned the page-expiring thing.
In MVC framework, usually the page state is not stored on server. So if
you have one page, open another in different window, work with the later
one and then return to previous window,
.
In a normal single window/frame app a page expire is not very common
(you have to go back 9 pages or something, you can configure that)
And that looks fine to me (i think 4 levels is already more then most
users are doing)
johan
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi.
I've read the article and I agree but I think
. if this usage doesn't work for you, can you explain why?
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi
Is there any way to specify the pagemap name for certain page
class/instance? I know there's a pageMap query parameter for
bookmarkable page but that does not seem sufficient for me.
I'd like to know if I can
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matej Knopp
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 5:10 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Wicket-user] Specify pagemap for page class
Hi
Is there any way to specify the pagemap name for certain page
class/instance? I know
this expresses what you want in a better way.
Matej Knopp wrote:
Okay, I won't touch it :)
Only thing I want to do is to say that all pages of class EditPage
will be in different pagemap than other pages. That all. I don't
really want
to mess with pagemap internals.
Jonathan Locke wrote:
do not do
, why is this a problem? is it new browser windows? because
popups and frames should work fine with pagemaps...
Matej Knopp wrote:
I'm not quite sure. What if user opened 10 different edit pages and
all of them would have isExpirable() returning false?
Would it mean that no other pages could
I don't understand, what's the point of converting wicket-example into
series of independent netbeans projects.
Wouldn't it be simpler to create one netbeans web project, copy the
source code from wicket examples into new project's src folder and also
copy the contents of the web folder
Try changing the rendering strategy to REDIRECT_TO_RENDER and see if it
works. I've had similiar problem and this solved it. But beware if
you're using hibernate, redirect to render may cause problems with lazy
initialized properties.
Johan Compagner wrote:
I have couple of questions:
1.
working with it. You
can't because it's expired. It's no longer in the pagemap. But the
detail pages (which are still in the pagemap) contain references to it.
(Or at least in my application they do).
On 7/7/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at my application I just realized one
.
Matej Knopp wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
I'm not an expert on this topic, but why is setResponsePage(back);
setRedirect(true) not sufficient? I'm using constructs like
setResponsePage(new MyPage()) from time to time and seems to works
fine. Does the back instance contain the information
Hi,
is it possible to make a component (derived from WebMarkupContainer)
that would render in multiple tags?
e.g. I have the following markup
span wicket:id=component_idSomething/span
and the result would be
span wicket:id=component_idSomething/span
another-tagSomething/another-tag
Many
This is something I wanted to avoid. I don't want the component to carry
any markup, I want it to use parent's markup.
Phil Kulak wrote:
Yup, use a panel.
-Phil
On 7/11/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to make a component (derived from WebMarkupContainer
Well, I've done a simple profiling usin JProfiler beta. Beware I've
never done any java profiling before. From what I've seen it really
doesn't seem that managin state is a big overhead. It seems that the
markup rendering is the bottleneck.
http://knopp.sk/calltrees.zip
Here are the
Could you please post somewhere the war file with logging disabled?
I tried adding log4j.properties with the following content
log4j.threshold=info
log4j.debug=false
into the wicket-benchmark class path but it helped only a little.
It seems that I'm doing something wrong.
Thank you.
Chris
=
priority value=INFO/
/category
root
appender-ref ref=CONSOLE/
/root
/log4j:configuration
Matej Knopp wrote:
Could you please post somewhere the war file with logging disabled?
I tried adding log4j.properties with the following content
log4j.threshold=info
log4j.debug
Hmm.. Using YourKit Java Profiler, wicket really is only marginaly
slower. I wonder why JProfiler makes such a difference (on the highest
accurate settings).
Matej Knopp wrote:
Thank you.
The results I get are mixed. When editing acustomer entry and saving it,
the performance is comparable
The BeanFactory is created only on application startup. It's put in the
application constructor. Or am I missing something?
Actually, i'm using the spring ContextLoaderListener and then find the
ApplicationContext in the ServletContext.
I have this line in my Application.init () function
Nick Heudecker wrote:
Then I'm confused. First day with Wicket and all...
Isn't the Application object only created once?
Yes, it is.
On 7/11/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Woa, Nick, not a good option. Creating an XmlBeanFactory is very
expensive, something you want to do on
No problem, You've just overlooked it. To me, such things happen all the
time :)
Phil Kulak wrote:
I'm sorry, Marej and Nick. I totally missed that Nick was creating the
BeanFactory in the application. Disregard my posts in this topic.
On 7/11/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do
Hi.
You can't access the nested properties directly from html as far as I
know. For things like this you need to use the BoundCompoundPropertyModel.
See http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Models
-Matej
Nick Heudecker wrote:
Hi,
For the first large form I'm building, I have a
Yeah, I've seen it somewhere. I think it's a great idea. Actually, I
think I've some components with - in their name, but it wouldn't take
longer than few minutes to change :)
Btw. what about other separators? (':' or '#' for example). Not that -
would't be ok :)
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Btw,
javax.servlet.ServletResponse;
/**
*
* @author Matej Knopp
* @version
*/
public class URLFilter implements Filter {
// The filter configuration object we are associated with. If
// this value is null, this filter instance is not currently
// configured.
private FilterConfig filterConfig
didn't really decide on one, except that it has
to be a java reserved character (so you can't use it in your property
names).
What do you prefer? Maybe we should have a vote on this?
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
Yeah, I've seen it somewhere. I think it's a great idea. Actually, I
think I've some
to.
Matej Knopp wrote:
Well, I once wrote a servlet filter for use with wicket that can
conceal the whole URL. Actually, it was inspired by your wizard
example :)
What it does is that the whole URL is stored in session, so there's no
URL visible in browser URL field, back button is disabled
Okay, I don't object and vote for ':'.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
We have plans to replace the current dot ('.') seperator in component
paths by another character. The main reason for wanting this, is to
avoid conflicts with Ognl, and be able to use nested properties more
easily. E.g., when that
If I understand it correctly, the bean looks like this
class BeanClass {
Company company;
// setters, getters
}
the component id is company.name and it's bound to the company.name
property of the BeanClass object.
Phil Kulak wrote:
I like the colon myself, but I'm a little confused
Actually, I'd leave this to the url encrypter, because using '/'
properly would mean changing the url structure.
having
...library?component=7.border/books/2/moveDownversion=0interface=ILinkListener
instead of
...library?component=7.border.books.2.moveDownversion=0interface=ILinkListener
resp.
breadcrumbs only because the
component hierarchy could not be properly reflected in the URL.
Could someone explain me, why you have stuff like
interface=ILinkListener in render request? What ILinkListener does?
Does it do actual rendering? If not, why is it there?
Michael.
On 7/13/05, Matej
Hmm. You're right. I think that the version should have changed. Maybe
someone will clarify this behavior (and tell if it's intentional).
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
On 7/12/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to disable the back button
Back button should work that is how
think anyone in this thread is dumb (that's
including you :)
As I recall, when I starting using wicket I was trying to figure the
same things you are.
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
On 7/13/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I think that the default URL scheme is made to be as simple
Actually, there is some versioning still there. But if you
turn of default versioning (via Application.getSettings ()), it works
well. (resembles web islands behavior).
Shouldn't be all versioning turned off for hangman?
Btw. I tried another thing - add these headers to hangman
Well, these headers work with internet explorer. The page is properly
reloaded on back button. But it does not work with Firefox nor does it
work with opera. It think thigs would be easier if more browsers honored
this headers.
-Matej
Johan Compagner wrote:
Btw. I tried another thing
Have a look at
http://widlak.intrak.tuke.sk:8080/wicket1/library
It works similiar way.
But it will be online only for a limited time. Less then one hour
probably. I've no other place to put it online at this time.
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
On 7/13/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
Not Found
The requested URL /wicketdialog was not found on this server.
---
It doesn't for me. What's supposed to be there?
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
http://www.superinterface.com/wicketdialog does not work?
Eelco
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
On 7/13/05,
Hmm.. you can try
http://widlak.intrak.tuke.sk:8080/wicket1/displaytag
as well. But don't follow links to the link-omatic example :)
I hope it works and you can get through my firewall.
Matej Knopp wrote:
Have a look at
http://widlak.intrak.tuke.sk:8080/wicket1/library
It works similiar way
Sorry, I disagree here. I think that it would bring unnecessary complexity.
Actually, only the URLs will change. It should not affect any existing
wicket programs. The user really doesn't have to care, if the components
in url are separated by '.' or ':'.
It really has nothing to do with class
, but they should be build by wicket too).
-Matej
Gili wrote:
As soon as it affects Javascript (which Eelco mentioned it would) it
becomes a user problem. And the unncessary complexity is all under the
hood, where it should remain.
Gili
Matej Knopp wrote:
Sorry, I disagree here. I think
restricting*. And it's also has it's issues.
It was ment just as a proof of concept. I wanted to see if it's can be
possible. And it is :)
You can find the servlet filter somewhere in this thread as an attachment.
-Matej
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
On 7/14/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED
can you decide, for which one is the url relevant?
Gili wrote:
Matej Knopp wrote:
Once again. There's no way for wicket to decide wheter '.' separates
components or it's a part of component name. It's ambiguous.
Therefore today '.' can't be part of component name. And that's what's
wrong. OGNL
Gili wrote:
Matej Knopp wrote:
Once again. There's no way for wicket to decide wheter '.' separates
components or it's a part of component name. It's ambiguous.
Therefore today '.' can't be part of component name. And that's what's
wrong. OGNL supports nested beans and this way it can't
]), hyphens (-),
underscores (_), colons (:), and periods (.).
So the choice is between hyphen and colon. As underscore is a valid
identifier element for Java, and period is the thing we want to get rid of.
Martijn
Matej Knopp wrote:
I don't know what's the state of current ajax implementation
Actually, I'm afraid that there's no way of having web islands working
with opera. Because even if the URL doesn't change, opera is still able
to go back.
-Matej
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
I decided to start a new thread about reload on Back. Despite of
whether we as server-side developers
,
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi
I know I has already been discussed here but I'm not quite sure so I'm
asking again.
When I do this
setResponsePage(page);
setRedirect(true);
and the page instance is no longer in pagemap, shouldn't it be put
there? I'm using wicket 1.0 and it doesn't seem
offline. Could you be so kind
and test
whether this is still a bug?
Cheers,
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi
I know I has already been discussed here but I'm not quite sure so
I'm asking again.
When I do this
setResponsePage(page);
setRedirect(true);
and the page instance is no longer
. Maybe after 1.0?
I'm sending you the current snapshot offline. Could you be so kind
and test
whether this is still a bug?
Cheers,
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi
I know I has already been discussed here but I'm not quite sure so
I'm asking again.
When I do this
setResponsePage(page
Yeah, I'm sorry to have misleaded you. Sometimes, tomcat droves me mad.
I'm definitely going to check the JettyLauncher plugin.
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Bummer. Ok, we'll look into it.
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
Actually, I double checked it and the bug is still here. Seems like
tomcat
competitors :)), so
maybe if you complain, he'll fix it :)
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
Yeah, I'm sorry to have misleaded you. Sometimes, tomcat droves me
mad. I'm definitely going to check the JettyLauncher plugin.
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Bummer. Ok, we'll look into it.
Eelco
Matej Knopp
or better said the JVM should
reload code (hotswap)
johan
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Johan is one of the Sysdeo Tomcat plugin guys (we're competitors :)),
so maybe if you complain, he'll fix it :)
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
Yeah, I'm sorry to have misleaded you. Sometimes, tomcat droves me
mad
the page map when it is going to rendered.
So a response page will from now always be at the front of its pagemap.
I did this in 1.1 stream (beta will be released this weekend)
do you need it in the 1.0 stream? Then we will backport it. (or i think
eelco will do it anyway :))
johan
Matej Knopp
Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men wrote:
Although I do use interfaces for my facade/dao.
-
In the beginning I though that it would be a good idea to create a dao
abstraction. But my experience so far is that is it impossible to switch from
Dao
This does work, but you have to call redirectTo instead of
setResponsePage in your constructor.
like
redirectTo (new Page1(parameters));
-Matej
josh lim wrote:
I tried to use a setRespnosePage at first since that was how I used it
on the onSubmit callbacks... but it did not redirect when I
it is inconsistent. Don't you think so?
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
This does work, but you have to call redirectTo instead of
setResponsePage in your constructor.
like
redirectTo (new Page1(parameters));
-Matej
josh lim wrote:
I tried to use a setRespnosePage at first since that was how I used
once
Josh
On 7/16/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't seem to be inconsistent to me.
SetResponsePage sets a page to respond. But IMHO to respond you need an
action first. In constructor, there's no such action. When you click on
a link or submit a form, it is an action
Hmm.. I've extended the ChoiceList class to get this behavior. It works,
but I really don't know if there's not a better solution for 1.0.
In 1.1 things have changed and ChoiceList will no longer exist. Johan
Compagner has posted details ~week ago.
As for 1.0, I've done it this way
public
Hi
Couple of days ago I needed to write some javascript (as wicket
component). So I created a new label and put the javascript there. But
of course it didn't work, because the string got escaped. Briefly
looking at the source code, I've done it this way
item.add (new Label (script, var
Would be page interface enough? I mean, the only current usecase that
were here presented is AOP, which IMHO would be nice to have but I'm
afraid it's not worth the complication it would introduce.
In my application, most of the actions belong to components. Forms,
Links, even more
I think yes, I do.
-Matej
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
+1
Juergen
On 7/17/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 by me
that should is strange
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Do you want it changed in 1.1?
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
Wow. Now that's what can be called lack of perception
The borders can be little complicated to use. In wicket 1.1 there is
markup inheritance which IMHO simplyfies these things a lot.
-Matej
Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men wrote:
I have removed them and now it works.
The difference between a bordered page and a non bordered is:
1) in the html no
Hi. I'm using wicket 1.0 and I just realized, that it is possible to
invoke action (ILinkListener, etc) on an invisible component.
Is this intentional?
Because in my application it causes problems. For example I've page with
my bean properties and several buttons to edit/manipulate it. I
when Wicket
regconizes that an invisible component is called?
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi. I'm using wicket 1.0 and I just realized, that it is possible to
invoke action (ILinkListener, etc) on an invisible component.
Is this intentional?
Because in my application it causes problems
Sorry, ignore the previous post, I've sent it by mistake.
-Matej
Matej Knopp wrote:
Johan Compagner wrote:
redirect to the same page as you where on?
So the just directly redirect to the invoker page if a component that
is invisible (or one of the parents)
But maybe developers or users get
be the component
because that one was invisible so couldn't generate itself)
johan
Matej Knopp wrote:
The easiest would be to do nothing. Do as normal, just ignore the
action. So if put in a url that would trigger action on invisible
component, I would just get redirected to
appName
the error page is configurable.
Martijn
Matej Knopp wrote:
The easiest would be to do nothing. Do as normal, just ignore the
action. So if put in a url that would trigger action on invisible
component, I would just get redirected to
appName?component=Xinterface=IRedirectLitener,...etc
Another
, as it is a (serious) security issue. However,
the process of creating a new release will have its backlash on the
development of 1.1. Putting out any release usually takes out a good
part of a weekend day.
Martijn
Matej Knopp wrote:
I suppose that this will be fixed in 1.1. Will it also be backported
to 1.0
Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men wrote:
Another improvement:
the Validator should not be so thightly coupled to the FormComponent ( have
found no reason why it should). The Validator should validate a value and not a
FormComponent and should return a collection of errors. This way the components
Hi.
I know this is little off topic but I'd like to ask if anyone know an
easy way to generate web pages from template within eclipse.
Recently I started thinking about internationalizing my application and
realized, that most of the strings to translate are actually in html
files. So
Hi.
Is there any way to disable automactic form validation when using
multiple submit buttons? I remember some time ago one had to call
validate on form manually form each handler. Now it's called automatically.
I want to have a cancel button and having the form validated first means
that
What I wanted to do was having a one markup (like Page_src.html) that
would look like
html
$(item1)
/html
and properties for different languages that could be used as model to
generate Page_en, Page_sk, Page_de, etc. These pages would be generated
statically from ide. But I don't want it
=1235319group_id=119783atid=684978
Juergen, is there anything more we can do here? We had a discussion
about 18n text replacing on this list last week too, so it seems like a
good idea to consider whether we can support this better...
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
What I wanted to do was having
in optimizing
this because it won't happen periodicaly, only on markup reload.
Well, I'm going to get some sleep, it's 3:12 AM here :)
-Matej
Matej Knopp wrote:
I have done some basic stuff.
I have UrlFilterResourceStream class with function
String filter(String source) {
...
}
that can
+0 too.
It seems to be a little bit better by design, making it threadsafe. But
the real benefits are not clear no me. The gained speed improvement is
IMHO unmeasurable.
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Last week there was a discussion about making AbstractValidator thread
safe.
Who is for
and
add it into the ApplicationSettings?
Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matej Knopp
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 1:06 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Wicket-user] Custom message provider?
Hi,
there's
(latin 2) encoding so that
you don't need to put any escaped characters in. Then, as part of the
build pocess run native2ascii on all of the properties files to get all
the extended characters correctly escaped.
regards,
Chris
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi,
there's a big discussion today about
want (see General - Content Types)
Thank you. I overlooked this option. Though I knew I can set the
encoding of specific property file.
-Matej
johan
Matej Knopp wrote:
Tried it. But I had to set the encoding of property files to iso8859-2
manually. When I forgot it, eclipse threw away all
to close the
door on 1.0.2.
Martijn
Matej Knopp wrote:
No need for 1.0 to be supported.
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Lots of fixes and improvements this week. That's good. It getting
harder to maintain the 1.0 branch though. The plan was not to do any
API breaking fixes
wrote:
I like it (haven't look at the source code, but I like the
functionality). What about having a vote whether and where (which
project) this should be integrated?
I'm off to bed soon, but I'll certainly take a look tomorrow!
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi.
I've made a demo showing
it in the extensions project).
I think that wicket core should be as small and thin as possible. IMHO
this should be an add on. Not every wicket user needs translation.
-Matej
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
I think the functionality is more important that the actual source
code. This example
-extension?
Juergen
On 7/23/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
we've discussed it already and agreed on waiting for Matej to come up
with a first draft to proof that the idea works, and it obviously does
very well.
But I guess I'm
1.1.0-b1 is a great release. I've succesfully upgraded my current
project. It was almost painless :) Actually, it consisting of removing
a class that was a wrapper around ListMultipleChoice, because it was
obsolete in 1.1, as well as removing my own ChoiceList implementation,
since it's no
Sure you can. :)
-Matej
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Can I use this comment on my blog? A little advertisement never hurt ;-)
Martijn
Matej Knopp wrote:
1.1.0-b1 is a great release. I've succesfully upgraded my current
project. It was almost painless :) Actually, it consisting of
removing
Hi, I'm using 1.1 and I just tried markup inheritance. It works almost
ok, but there's one strange thing. The generated page source code starts
with wicket:extend. It's even before doctype, and that's bad. It's
there no matter if setStripWicketTags is on or off. Is this correct
behavior?
/html
Exactly.
I'l check it.
Thanks.
-MAtej
Juergen
On 7/27/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm.. If this is default behavieor, then I think it's a little bit
weird. Having wicket:extend before doctype causes problems.
I still don't understand the reason for this. Having markup
is, what is more important.
Juergen
On 7/27/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
I agree, nothing should go before doctype. But we don't test it.
Actually you might add doctype whereever you want to. I think none of
the web frameworks validates the output. They all rely
?
Juergen
On 7/28/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm.. This does sound logical. But then we should use doctype of the
component (inherited page) and put it in front, ignoring the doctype of
the parent page.
I understand, but IMO it is too much of magic. Will it be clear to
every user
. I understand it's comes from the way markup inheritance is
implemented.
-Matej
Matej Knopp wrote:
SetStripWicketTag() should definitely be fixed.
Once this is fixed, having doctype first would be nice, but not necessary.
-Matej
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
How important is it for you
I'm afraid not. When using markup inheritance and having setStrip...
off, the result page looks like this
wicket:extenddoctype...
everybrowser will ignore doctype, as it's preceeded by wicket:extends.
So no schema is going to help there.
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Phil Kulak wrote:
I
Hmm.. couldn't there be both?
public AbstractChoice(final String id, IModel model, final List choices,
final IChoiceRenderer renderer)
{
this(id, model, new Model(choices), renderer)
}
public AbstractChoice(final String id, IModel model, final IModel
wrote:
Yes and on all its subclasses.
But we could do that...
Matej Knopp wrote:
Yeah, 9 might seem a little bit scary number :) But i think most of
them are self-explaining...
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
That would mean having 9 (!) constructors though...
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote
+1
I've allways wondered why are they there :)
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
I think we should remove these methods. They are quite easy to implement
yourself, and they limit the ways we can change ListView's internals.
I can see they are 'handy', but I feel they also mess up the idea that a
Hi.
I've a logout link and I want it to invalidate the session and redirect
to homepage. Is there a simple way to do this? Calling
Session.invalidate() in link handler throws java.lang.IllegalStateException.
Thanks
-Matej
---
SF.Net
()
{
getSession().invalidate();
}
}
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi.
I've a logout link and I want it to invalidate the session and
redirect to homepage. Is there a simple way to do this? Calling
Session.invalidate() in link handler throws
java.lang.IllegalStateException.
Thanks
-Matej
Matej Knopp wrote:
How can you ensure that a session will be closed? What if user got
disconnected? Will the session hang open until the http session timeout?
Another problem that comes to my mind is that hibernate session is not
thread safe. Using one session through multiple request you
1 - 100 of 686 matches
Mail list logo
