We could still apply this common case, and maybe test for the specific
ones (web logic, which uses a zip variant, right?) if possible. WDYT
Johan?
Eelco
On 11/27/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So instead of opening a connection inside the jar we just open a connection
> to the j
On 11/27/06, Sebastiaan van Erk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [I sent this mail to wicket-develop as well, but I have not seen it
> there yet, is that list filtered?]
The old dev list is shut down. You should have received a message
stating this. Now that we're incubating Wicket, we moved the dev l
So instead of opening a connection inside the jar we just open a connection
to the jar only.
That would work for the app servers that uses the jar url connection but it
won't help
for example WebLogic and others. Because they use there own kind of thing..
johan
On 11/27/06, Sebastiaan van Erk
[I sent this mail to wicket-develop as well, but I have not seen it
there yet, is that list filtered?]. This is a workaround method for the
wicket developers to solve the problem with "Too many open files" that a
lot of people have been having. It's a bug in Sun's JarURLConnection (I
reported i