Martijn, grab the G4 optimized version of Firefox ... I've been a
staunch supporter of safari on my powerbook for over a year and a
half .. and this optimized version, called DeerPark i think ... rocks
On Dec 5, 2005, at 10:56 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Just for the record, Google's back
Months ago, I had an impression that wicket dojo will support back button
to Ajax. I am very excited to have wicket-contrib-dojo-examples run week
ago. After several clicks on FX test pages, I clicked on back button (IE),
I notice that I left the test page completely. Bookmarking into those
I think this is a problem with ajax and not with dojo support - although most people would argue that this is one of the bigger advantages of ajax. because the clicks do not change the browser's url the browser never records them in the history - and how could it.
-IgorOn 12/5/05, Eelco Hillenius
In fact, sites have been doing ajax long before ajax was called ajax.
And in fact the whole literal ajax, refering to using XML as the
messaging language and XmlHttpRequest object is bollucks, as there
seem to be more sites not using that than there are that do use it.
I am still not very
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2005/10/26/ajax-handling-bookmarks-and-back-button.html
On 12/5/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gmail is doing this by changing an src attr of a frame - which does generate
an entry a browser can keep track of. while other things are done via xmlrpc
Just for the record, Google's back button support SUCKs big time in
Safari. I have to kill my gmail session far too often to get excited
about Ajax and back button.
Martijn
On 12/6/05, Gili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI: Google's AJAX handles back button just fine so it must be
