[Wicket-user] Problem in generation of the html code of the page

2006-11-10 Thread Alberto Bueno
When I create a page, and this page generate this html code: script type=text/javascript !--/*--![CDATA[/*!--*/ if (window.name=='') { window.location=/quickstart/app?wicket:interface=:1::INewBrowserWindowListener; } /*--]]*//script Now, I add a button in the page (a very simple page):

Re: [Wicket-user] Problem in generation of the html code of the page

2006-11-10 Thread Korbinian Bachl
What version of Wicket do you use? Regards Korbinian -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Alberto Bueno Gesendet: Freitag, 10. November 2006 10:35 An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: [Wicket-user] Problem in

Re: [Wicket-user] Problem in generation of the html code of the page

2006-11-10 Thread Alberto Bueno
The trunk What version of Wicket do you use? Regards Korbinian -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Alberto Bueno Gesendet: Freitag, 10. November 2006 10:35 An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff:

Re: [Wicket-user] Problem in generation of the html code of the page

2006-11-10 Thread Korbinian Bachl
2.0 ? or 1.x ? (sorry, dont know whats in Trunk at the moment you got it) you might want to use wicket 1.2.3 as this hasnt the behaviour so far... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Alberto Bueno Gesendet: Freitag, 10.

Re: [Wicket-user] Problem in generation of the html code of the page

2006-11-10 Thread Igor Vaynberg
add a bug into jira with your quickstart-igorOn 11/10/06, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:2.0 ?or1.x ?(sorry, dont know whats in Trunk at the moment you got it) you might want to use wicket 1.2.3 as this hasnt the behaviour so far... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL

Re: [Wicket-user] Problem in generation of the html code of the page

2006-11-10 Thread Korbinian Bachl
I cant notice this behaviour with wicket 1.2.3 so far - under 1.2.2 i have cases where the JS part misses, not so more under 1.2.3... Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Igor VaynbergGesendet: Freitag, 10. November 2006 17:57An: