So the concern now is performance? Is this really
meaningful? If there is a substantial performance penalty for it,
wouldn't that just mean that Wicket is already slow?
On 8/27/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it is not. for open-close tags like span/ onBodyRender is simply
Well... I don't think a performance loss actually matters in this case.
Think about it... if there *is* a body when there shouldn't be and we
throw an exception it tends to be fatal anyway. Doing this extra check
should not seriously affect the performance of tags which render
properly. For
I still don't agree at all. I think at the very least this should
throw an exception. Ie, why is it legal to add a body to an XML
element that doesn't allow one?On 8/26/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm... it would make sense if there were a distinction between theempty string and null
it is not. for open-close tags like span/ onBodyRender is simply not
called and thus no output is generated and for the same reason we can
not check if there is but shouldn't. We are either fast and efficient
or slow but with better error messages.
Juergen
On 8/28/05, Jesse Sightler [EMAIL
We used to have that some time ago and users complaint about the
magic, which didn't fit there use case. Currently it is easy: we do
not automatically convert span/ into span. We do not change any
tag automatically. And because a span/ has no body, onComponentBody
is not called either.
Juergen
Hmm, sounds logical when you put it that way! :-)
/Gwyn
On 26/08/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We used to have that some time ago and users complaint about the
magic, which didn't fit there use case. Currently it is easy: we do
not automatically convert span/ into span. We
Yea, but span/span also has no body.
On 8/26/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We used to have that some time ago and users complaint about the
magic, which didn't fit there use case. Currently it is easy: we do
not automatically convert span/ into span. We do not change any
tag
hmm? the body is isn't it?
On 8/26/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea, but span/span also has no body.
On 8/26/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We used to have that some time ago and users complaint about the
magic, which didn't fit there use case. Currently it is
Hmm... it would make sense if there were a distinction between the
empty string and null in XML. You're probably right.
On 8/26/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm? the body is isn't it?
On 8/26/05, Phil Kulak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea, but span/span also has no body.
