Re: [Wicket-user] beforeCallComponent and afterCallComponent

2005-10-29 Thread Sven Meier
import wicket.markup.html.WebPage; if (page instanceof WebPage) { ((WebPage)page).beforeCallComponent(component, method); } . if (page instanceof WebPage) { ((WebPage)page).afterCallComponent(component, method); } Is that realy a problem? It is not a dependency to another

[Wicket-user] beforeCallComponent and afterCallComponent

2005-10-28 Thread sven
Regarding the newly added 'around functionality' of WebRequestCycle and WebPage. I certainly welcome this addition in the background of Spring integration and AOP, but I see some problems with this implementation. First of all we now have a new dependency to HTML markup in

Re: [Wicket-user] beforeCallComponent and afterCallComponent

2005-10-28 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
On 10/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Regarding the newly added 'around functionality' of WebRequestCycle and WebPage. I certainly welcome this addition in the background of Spring integration and AOP, but I see some problems with this implementation. First of all we now

Re: [Wicket-user] beforeCallComponent and afterCallComponent

2005-10-28 Thread Johan Compagner
Would be very nice to give it some though But i was not talking about url generation Just handling the component listeners (After the parsing of the url) So pure the java side (so really the method where the talk is for now: I was talking pure for this method: private void invokeInterface(final

Re: [Wicket-user] beforeCallComponent and afterCallComponent

2005-10-28 Thread Eelco Hillenius
I'm fine with any changes on the short term if that makes it better for people to use. For the longer term (1.2.), we should re-think more about generalizing it. It's probably not difficult either, just a lot of thinking before implementing. Eelco On 10/28/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]