wcn- wicket is also has a +1 for me (then the name wicket is more
open and visible in all the html pages :))
BUT i am only +1 IF it happens before 1.0!
We can't do such a change after 1.0... That would be really horrible...
johan
Jonathan Carlson wrote:
I'd support the change to
Actually, as we're in beta now, and not in alpha, architectural things
are allready pinned down for the larger part. We can have some changes,
but we should be committed to keep impact as small as possible. Now, for
1.1 (or even 2.x), drastic changes - if needed - are allowed again. So
we
Ooops, I meant to send it to the list instead of to you personally. I
just did a re-post
Gili wrote:
Ok, so if I understand you correctly: you don't consider moving
from a id attribute approach to full-fledged wicket tags a major
change that would force users to have to re-learn working with
I'd support the change to "wicket-". "wcn-" feels
strange and cryptic to a new user.I wouldwantnew users
first impressions to be "intuitive". The first thing viewed by new users
is the HTML.
I have another reallyminor request: Can we drop the extra generated spaces around the equal signs
i think we should make it configurable, with the default being to remove
the spaces. as you point out, this is normal in HTML. i personally
like the spaces... but then i'm wierd... ;-)
Jonathan Carlson wrote:
I'd support the change to wicket-. wcn- feels strange and cryptic
to a new user.
